CITY VOTES TO SETTLE SUITS IN DEATHS : COUNCIL OKS $2.15 MILLION IN '92 SLAYINGS.Byline: Patrick McGreevy Daily News Staff Writer The Los Angeles City Council 2. LAPD - Los Angeles Police Department. officer involved in a domestic dispute with his estranged es·trange tr.v. es·tranged, es·trang·ing, es·trang·es 1. To make hostile, unsympathetic, or indifferent; alienate. 2. To remove from an accustomed place or set of associations. wife and her lover. The council also voted to conduct a review of the Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. Police Department's policy on domestic violence because of concern that the department knew Officer Victor Ramos had pointed his city-owned service revolver at his wife at her workplace three months before he killed her. The Police Department took away Ramos' service weapons after the first incident. But council members were particularly troubled that the department gave the weapons back to Ramos just two months before the fatal shooting without a required written psychological evaluation saying the officer was capable of carrying a gun. ``Clearly, in 1992, potentially some action could have been taken that wasn't,'' said Councilwoman Laura Chick. ``This is just a glaring example of how important it is that the department change in these matters.'' The lawsuits were filed on behalf of survivors of Ramos' wife, Melba, and the widow of Gregory Thomas. Melba Ramos This article or section needs sources or references that appear in reliable, third-party publications. Alone, primary sources and sources affiliated with the subject of this article are not sufficient for an accurate encyclopedia article. and Gregory Thomas were shot to death by Victor Ramos on Aug. 12, 1992, when the off-duty West Los Angeles
prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. a report by the City Attorney's Office. Victor Ramos, 29, then killed himself. Gregory Yates, an attorney representing the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, said the LAPD contributed to the crime by failing to follow proper procedure. ``The Police Department's failure to effectively deal with spousal abuse . . . is very egregious e·gre·gious adj. Conspicuously bad or offensive. See Synonyms at flagrant. [From Latin and frightening,'' Yates said. Ramos should have been arrested May 18, 1992, when he beat his wife and pointed his gun at her, Yates said. Senior Assistant City Attorney G. Daniel Woodard said policy at the time required Ramos to be evaluated by a city Personnel Department psychologist to determine whether Ramos was fit to return to work and get his gun back - a procedure that was not followed. During a civil trial, the city argued that it should not be held responsible for the actions of one of its officers when he is off-duty and under the influence of alcohol. But a Superior Court jury in Glendale awarded Thomas' widow $1.7 million in 1995 - of which $650,000 was owed by the city for its allocation of fault in the case. A federal lawsuit filed on behalf of the Ramoses' three young children and the dead woman's parents was scheduled to begin this month. It charged a pattern of not prosecuting police officers for domestic violence. The City Attorney's Office recommended a $1.5 million settlement of that case, fearing the city could face a major judgment. The council vote to approve the settlement of the two cases was 9-2, with Councilmen Joel Wachs Joel Wachs served for several terms as Los Angeles City Councilman for the 2nd district. He was first elected by defeating incumbent James B. Potter. While in office, Wachs chaired the Public Works Committee and vice-chair of the Environmental Quality & Waste Management and Nate Holden Nathaniel "Nate" R. Holden (1929-) served on the Los Angeles City Council from 1987 to 2002. He previously served a term on the California State Senate and was Assistant Chief Deputy to then Los Angeles County Supervisor Kenneth Hahn. voting no. ``It's taxpayers' dollars,'' Holden said. ``If this guy had been a street maintenance man, a janitor, an office worker, and he had done this to himself, his wife, the city wouldn't pay a nickel. But because he is a police officer, they are saying they have a special right to sue.'' Wachs said he was protesting large jury awards against the city. |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion