Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,702,589 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

CIMS Calls for Fewer First Cesareans, No Prostaglandin Inductions of VBACs.


Editor's Note: This is in response to the study published last month in the New England Journal of Medicine The New England Journal of Medicine (New Engl J Med or NEJM) is an English-language peer-reviewed medical journal published by the Massachusetts Medical Society. It is one of the most popular and widely-read peer-reviewed general medical journals in the world. . Look for a thorough rebuttal of the NEJM NEJM New England Journal of Medicine  study in the next issue of Special Delivery.

In a statement released July 12, 2001, the Coalition for Improving Maternity Services (CIMS CIMS Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences (New York University)
CIMS Center for Integrated Manufacturing Studies (Rochester Institute of Technology)
CIMS Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry
) responded to a recent New England Journal of Medicine article on vaginal birth after cesarean vaginal birth after cesarean VBAC Obstetrics Vagina delivery of an infant after a cesarean section Complications Uterine apoplexy  (VBAC VBAC
abbr.
vaginal birth after cesarean


VBAC
Vaginal birth after cesarean.

Mentioned in: Cesarean Section

VBAC Vaginal birth after cesarean section, see there
). CIMS calls for fewer first cesareans and avoiding the use of prostaglandin induction births after a previous cesarean cesarean /ce·sar·e·an/ (se-zar´e-an) see under section.

ce·sar·e·an or cae·sar·e·an or cae·sar·i·an or ce·sar·i·an
adj.
Of or relating to a cesarean section.
. CIMS also calls for continuing the use of VBACs as safer for women and equally safe for babies as repeat cesareans.

The CIMS Statement reads as follows: The most important finding of the recent New England Journal of Medicine study on vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) was the strong agreement with previous studies that prostaglandin induction is less safe for women and their babies than a normal labor, an induction without prostaglandin, or a repeat cesarean.

The study data do not support limiting VBACs because the data covered only uterine rupture. This study did not compare all of the risks and benefits over repeat cesarean versus VBAC. VBAC is as safe as repeat cesarean for babies and safer for women as shown in more than two-dozen studies totaling more than 50,000 women. Women having planned repeat cesareans had significantly more medical complications than women having VBACs.

CIMS supports `mother-friendly childbirth,' which includes giving women accurate information, avoiding unnecessary interventions, and offering access to professional midwifery care. The midwifery model of care supports and protects the normal birth process and is the safest and most appropriate kind of care for the majority of women and their babies, according to studies from around the world. Increased use of the midwifery model of care would reduce the primary cesarean section cesarean section (sĭzâr`ēən), delivery of an infant by surgical removal from the uterus through an abdominal incision. The operation is of ancient origin: indeed, the name derives from the legend that Julius Caesar was born in this  rate and reduce the use of induction for VBACs.

CIMS agrees with the advice of the American College of Nurse--Midwives that `women need unbiased, individualized information and, if they desire, a safe and supportive place to attempt a VBAC.'"

--The Coalition for Improving Maternity Services (CIMS--pronounced "kims") includes more than 50 organizations representing 90,000 members, and hundreds of individuals prominent in the fields of maternal and infant care. The coalition collaborates on public education, evidence-based care evidence-based care,
n a philosophy of treatment that relies on up-to-date, germane research as its foundation.
 issues, and designating facilities and services as Mother-Friendly. The mission of CIMS is to promote a wellness model of maternity care that will improve birth outcomes and substantially reduce costs. This evidence-based mother-baby-family friendly model focuses on prevention and wellness as the alternatives to high-cost screening, diagnosis, and treatment programs.
COPYRIGHT 2001 Association of Labor Assistants & Childbirth Educators
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:vaginal birth after cesarean; Coalition for Improving Maternity Services
Publication:Special Delivery
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Sep 22, 2001
Words:428
Previous Article:Eating Habits Affect Birth.
Next Article:The Cost of Kids.(upside of what a parent gets in return for their investment in a child)
Topics:



Related Articles
Once a cesarean, always a cesarean?(the health risk involved in choosing a vaginal birth, after a previous cesarean birth)(Brief Article)
Editorial poses new threats to Vaginal Birth After Cesarean. (Pregnancy & Birth).
Labor inductions. (Pregnancy & Birth).(Brief Article)
Link between cervical ripening and cesarean section.(Pregnancy & Birth)(Brief Article)
Cesarean birth and VBAC.(Labor Support And Childbirth Education)
The power of VBAC.(Labor Support And Childbirth Education)(vaginal birth after cesarean)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles