CHECK PRINTING BARRED : JUDGE RULES ON CASE LINKED TO FREEMEN.Byline: Bhavna Mistry Daily News Staff Writer After failing to attend a second court hearing, a Palmdale woman linked to the Montana Freeman group was barred from printing and distributing checks, which federal officials say are worthless. Neither Elizabeth Broderick nor two associates named in the temporary restraining order temporary restraining order: see injunction. appeared Thursday before U.S. District Court Judge William Keller, who on Monday had postponed action on the order because the trio was not present. ``There is no legal authority for what they are doing,'' said Keller. ``The conduct is totally inappropriate.'' As part of the restraining order restraining order: see injunction. , Broderick was forbidden to print, distribute, advertise, refer to or promote checks she calls ``comptroller's warrants'' or ``cashier's checks cashier's check n. a check issued by a bank on its own account for the amount paid to the bank by the purchaser with a named payee, and stating the name of the party purchasing the check (the remitter). ,'' which she says are backed by money she claims the government owes her. The judge also said the case against Broderick and the others - currently a civil matter only - may turn into a criminal investigation into bank fraud and mail fraud. Federal officials said Broderick is still allowed to conduct seminars, including a sold-out session planned for Sunday and Monday, at which people are told how to place liens on people or their property and how to use her checks. But she will no longer be allowed take orders or requests for her checks. ``If they do it, they will be in violation of the law,'' said Keller. ``If they violate the law, they will be hailed into court. I'm not going to go away. ``They will be held to answer,'' said Keller. ``Absence is not the appropriate answer.'' In a response filed with the U.S. Attorney's office Thursday, the trio - Broderick, Adolf Hoch of Loma Linda Loma Linda may refer to:
1. hotel in Lancaster was never signed. ``Defendant is accusing plaintiff of a fourth amendment violation by trespassing on the sovereign property under display of the American free flag of peace of the U.S.A. without a bonafied (sic) signed warrant by a judge of oath or affirmation,'' said a motion to dismiss the restraining order request. The temporary restraining order remains in effect for ten days. At an April 16 hearing, the U.S. Attorney General's office will seek a preliminary injunction A temporary order made by a court at the request of one party that prevents the other party from pursuing a particular course of conduct until the conclusion of a trial on the merits. A preliminary injunction is regarded as extraordinary relief. that will continue the ban through the course of a trial for a permanent restraining order. In a motion granted April 2, Broderick was barred from placing liens against postal workers A postal worker is one who works for a post office, such as a mail carrier. In the U.S., postal workers are represented by the National Postal Mail Handlers Union - NPMHU and the American Postal Workers Union, part of the AFL-CIO. or other federal employees without court permission. Authorities say Broderick had placed liens on various business and government agencies including Orange County, Antelope Municipal Court, television station KCAL kcal kilocalorie. kcal abbr. kilocalorie kcal kilocalorie. , Disney, the FBI and the U.S. Postal Service The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) processes and delivers mail to individuals and businesses within the United States. The service seeks to improve its performance through the development of efficient mail-handling systems and operates its own planning and engineering programs. . The judge described the liens as inconsistent with the law and without legal merit. A second hearing on that is scheduled for April 9. Before imposing the restraining order, Keller said he had given the three a second chance to appear in court. ``I take the court order very seriously,'' said Keller. ``I have given the defendants the benefit of the doubt. But under the law that is presented to me, you can not do what you want to do.'' ``I say this in an educational way,'' the judge added. ``But this is not going to be tolerated. In the future if they chose to present themselves, they are going to have to comply to local rules, federal rules.'' |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion