Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,505,585 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

CEMEX DISPUTING CLAIMS IN EPA SUIT.


Byline: JUDY O'ROURKE

Staff Writer

SANTA CLARITA Santa Clarita, city (1990 pop. 110,642), Los Angeles co., S Calif., suburb 30 mi (48 km) NW of downtown Los Angeles, on the Santa Clara River; inc. 1987. Situated in the Santa Clara valley and nearby canyons, Santa Clarita includes the former towns of Canyon Country,  -- Cemex-USA disputed claims made by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), independent agency of the U.S. government, with headquarters in Washington, D.C. It was established in 1970 to reduce and control air and water pollution, noise pollution, and radiation and to ensure the safe handling and  in a lawsuit lawsuit: see procedure; tort.  filed this week, saying the expansion of its massive Victorville cement plant not only didn't skirt skirt

abattoir term for diaphragm.
 the rules, it's also environmentally friendly Environmentally friendly, also referred to as nature friendly, is a term used to refer to goods and services considered to inflict minimal harm on the environment.[1]  and received the blessing of state officials.

The company -- whose aggregate mine planned outside Santa Clarita's borders is on hold -- said it followed a transparent and thorough permitting process, and state officials reviewed the improvements every step of the way.

"The EPA EPA eicosapentaenoic acid.

EPA
abbr.
eicosapentaenoic acid


EPA,
n.pr See acid, eicosapentaenoic.

EPA,
n.
 was aware of our plans a decade ago, as we worked with (California) regulators to secure the right permits," Cemex spokeswoman Susana Duarte said Thursday. "They did not make any requests for us to obtain federal permission at the time."

The company spent $181million improving the cement-making plant in 1999 and an additional $16million a few years later on a storage building that diminishes the release of fugitive dust from the plant, Duarte said.

The EPA's lawsuit, filed Monday, says Cemex CaliforniaLLC failed to follow federal regulations when it expanded the Victorville facility -- one of the largest cement-making plants in the country -- in 1997 and 2000. "We stand by the legal filing made Monday," EPA spokesman Francisco Arcaute said.

Should the EPA prevail in court, Cemex could face fines of up to $27,500 a day for violations prior to March 2004 and up to $32,500 per day for violations after that time.

judy.orourke@dailynews.com

(661) 257-5255
COPYRIGHT 2007 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Date:Mar 3, 2007
Words:245
Previous Article:FRAUD CHARGES BROUGHT.(News)
Next Article:DEPUTY'S KILLER SEEKS FORGIVENESS GARCIA TO SPEND LIFE IN PRISON AFTER LONG EXTRADITION BATTLE.(News)
Topics:



Related Articles
AID SOUGHT FOR MINE FIGHT CITY WANTS DAVIS, LOCKYER TO INTERVENE.(News)
New battles are waged against Cemex quarry.
Cemex Asia, a unit of the Mexican cement company, filed an arbitration claim in the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes...
CITY CRAFTS MINE PLAN ANNEXATION IS NEXT STEP.(News)
COUNCIL VOTES TO ANNEX PARCEL CITY FIGHTS TO LIMIT FUTURE GRAVEL MINING.(News)
Court provides concrete evidence with ruling on Cemex.(Cemex S.A. de C.V.)
CEMEX DROPS SUIT CHALLENGING REVIEW.(News)
COURT REJECTS CITY'S SUIT CEMEX'S CONSENT DECREE TO ESTABLISH QUARRY UPHELD.(News)
CEMEX DECLARES TRUCE ON MINE COMPROMISE SOUGHT WITH CITY.(News)
EPA SUES CEMEX OVER AIR QUALITY VICTORVILLE PLANT CONTROLS CITED.(News)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles