CEMEX DISPUTING CLAIMS IN EPA SUIT.Byline: JUDY O'ROURKE Staff Writer SANTA CLARITA Santa Clarita, city (1990 pop. 110,642), Los Angeles co., S Calif., suburb 30 mi (48 km) NW of downtown Los Angeles, on the Santa Clara River; inc. 1987. Situated in the Santa Clara valley and nearby canyons, Santa Clarita includes the former towns of Canyon Country, -- Cemex-USA disputed claims made by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), independent agency of the U.S. government, with headquarters in Washington, D.C. It was established in 1970 to reduce and control air and water pollution, noise pollution, and radiation and to ensure the safe handling and in a lawsuit lawsuit: see procedure; tort. filed this week, saying the expansion of its massive Victorville cement plant not only didn't skirt skirt abattoir term for diaphragm. the rules, it's also environmentally friendly Environmentally friendly, also referred to as nature friendly, is a term used to refer to goods and services considered to inflict minimal harm on the environment.[1] and received the blessing of state officials. The company -- whose aggregate mine planned outside Santa Clarita's borders is on hold -- said it followed a transparent and thorough permitting process, and state officials reviewed the improvements every step of the way. "The EPA EPA eicosapentaenoic acid. EPA abbr. eicosapentaenoic acid EPA, n.pr See acid, eicosapentaenoic. EPA, n. was aware of our plans a decade ago, as we worked with (California) regulators to secure the right permits," Cemex spokeswoman Susana Duarte said Thursday. "They did not make any requests for us to obtain federal permission at the time." The company spent $181million improving the cement-making plant in 1999 and an additional $16million a few years later on a storage building that diminishes the release of fugitive dust from the plant, Duarte said. The EPA's lawsuit, filed Monday, says Cemex CaliforniaLLC failed to follow federal regulations when it expanded the Victorville facility -- one of the largest cement-making plants in the country -- in 1997 and 2000. "We stand by the legal filing made Monday," EPA spokesman Francisco Arcaute said. Should the EPA prevail in court, Cemex could face fines of up to $27,500 a day for violations prior to March 2004 and up to $32,500 per day for violations after that time. judy.orourke@dailynews.com (661) 257-5255 |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion