Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,588,385 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

CEA Expresses Concerns over Supreme Court Grokster Ruling; Decision Decreases Legal Clarity While Increasing Likelihood of Litigation; Intent Test Establishes High Burden for Manufacturers and Entrepreneurs.


ARLINGTON, Va. -- The following statement was issued by Consumer Electronics Association President and CEO (1) (Chief Executive Officer) The highest individual in command of an organization. Typically the president of the company, the CEO reports to the Chairman of the Board.  Gary Shapiro regarding today's ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in Grokster v. MGM MGM
 in full Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.

U.S. corporation and film studio. It was formed when the film distributor Marcus Loew, who bought Metro Pictures in 1920, merged it with the Goldwyn production company in 1924 and with Louis B. Mayer Pictures in 1925.
. The main question before the Court in this case was whether providing a technology capable of substantial non-infringing uses constitutes copyright infringement Noun 1. copyright infringement - a violation of the rights secured by a copyright
infringement of copyright

plagiarisation, plagiarization, piracy, plagiarism - the act of plagiarizing; taking someone's words or ideas as if they were your own
.

"The immediate impact of today's ruling is twofold: massive uncertainty and the likelihood of massive legal bills. The Court has done little to provide a clear path for legitimate innovators innovators

people who will try new things.


early innovators
important figures in the farming or client community because they are the leaders in the introduction of new techniques and management systems.
 and manufacturers to avoid lawsuits related to copyright infringement over legitimate products and services.

"With this ruling the Supreme Court has handed a powerful new tool to litigious litigious adj. referring to a person who constantly brings or prolongs legal actions, particularly when the legal maneuvers are unnecessary or unfounded. Such persons often enjoy legal battles, controversy, the courtroom, the spotlight, use the courts to punish  content creators See content provider.  to stop innovation. Innovators must now consider new murky legal rules and potentially overwhelming legal costs before bringing their product to market - or even moving forward with an innovative idea. It is essentially a 'full employment act' for plaintiff's attorneys plaintiff's attorney n. the attorney who represents a plaintiff (the suing party) in a lawsuit. In lawyer parlance a "plaintiff's attorney" refers to a lawyer who regularly represents persons who are suing for damages, while a lawyer who is regularly chosen by an  and a guarantee for further lawsuits.

"While the Court appears to have sought to narrowly tailor this decision to protect technological development and provide some guidance to promote innovation, the intent test established under this ruling stands as a heavy burden. Content creators may potentially find any act as an 'infringement to induce' and shut down a new product or service with the threat of a lawsuit. Who knows how many innovative products and services now face a premature death Premature Death occurs when a living thing dies of a cause other than old age. A premature death can be the result of injury, illness, violence, suicide, poor nutrition (often stemming from low income), starvation, dehydration, or other factors.  as the result of this ruling?

"At the same time, the Court appears to have upheld the critical principles it established in its Betamax ruling, underscoring that products that have substantial non-infringing uses are legal even if they can be used for copyright infringement. The open question, again however, is the lack of clarity in determining intent to encourage infringement.

"As we continue to examine the full impact of this ruling we will determine the next steps in our continuing efforts to protect innovation, consumer choice and fair use rights."

About CEA CEA carcinoembryonic antigen.

CEA
abbr.
carcinoembryonic antigen


CEA (Carcinoembryonic antigen) 
:

The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) is the preeminent pre·em·i·nent or pre-em·i·nent  
adj.
Superior to or notable above all others; outstanding. See Synonyms at dominant, noted.



[Middle English, from Latin prae
 trade association promoting growth in the consumer technology industry through technology policy, events, research, promotion and the fostering of business and strategic relationships. CEA represents more than 2,000 corporate members involved in the design, development, manufacturing, distribution and integration of audio, video, mobile electronics, wireless and landline communications, information technology, home networking, multimedia and accessory products, as well as related services that are sold through consumer channels. Combined, CEA's members account for more than $121 billion in annual sales. CEA's resources are available online at www.CE.org, the definitive source for information about the consumer electronics industry.

CEA also sponsors and manages the International CES - Defining Tomorrow's Technology. All profits from CES are reinvested into industry services, including technical training and education, industry promotion, engineering standards development, market research and legislative advocacy.
UPCOMING EVENTS

--  CEA Summer Technology & Standards Forum
    July 25-29, 2005, Denver, CO

--  CEA Industry Forum
    October 17-19, 2005, Las Vegas, NV

--  EHX Fall
    November 7-11, 2005, Anaheim, CA

--  2006 International CES - Defining Tomorrow's Technology
    January 5-8, 2006, Las Vegas, NV

--  Winter Summit 2006
    March 2-4, 2006, Vail, CO

--  CEA Winter Technology & Standards Forum
    March 6-10, 2006, Clearwater Beach, FL

--  EHX Spring 2006
    March 28 - April 1, 2006, Orlando, FL
COPYRIGHT 2005 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Jun 27, 2005
Words:534
Previous Article:SISO To Preview Its 'Think Big' Executive Conference For The Exhibition Industry With Presentation On Attendee Marketing In Los Angeles; VNU...
Next Article:Sealed Air Announces Court Approval of Settlement Agreement; Agreement to Become Effective upon W.R. Grace's Emergence from Bankruptcy.



Related Articles
Legal malpractice in the 21st century.
TEI tells Supreme Court ... revenue rulings are mere litigating positions and not entitled to deference.
SONG SUITS HIT SOUR NOTE MAGISTRATE SAYS SCHOOLS NEED NOT REVEAL STUDENT SUSPECTS' NAMES.
HOLLYWOOD WINS BIG ON FILE SHARING.
File-sharing decision raises questions about third-party liability.
Does Grokster decision sound the death knell for Internet file sharing?
The Supreme Court and you: does it really matter who becomes a Supreme Court Justice?

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles