Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

CAPAs and risk analysis flaws net 8-item write up.


Medtronic Neurological neurological, neurologic

pertaining to or emanating from the nervous system or from neurology.


neurological assessment
evaluation of the health status of a patient with a nervous system disorder or dysfunction.
, Minneapolis, MN, received an eight-item 483 following a recent audit for incomplete risk analysis and failure to implement CAPA CAPA California Alternate Performance Assessment
CAPA Captaris, Inc (stock symbol)
CAPA Confederation of Asian and Pacific Accountants
CAPA Creative and Performing Arts (school) 
 procedures. Also issued was a July 3, 2007, warning letter.

Conducting the audit for the Minneapolis District Office was investigator Timothy Philips. Only the 483 was available at press time.

FDA FDA
abbr.
Food and Drug Administration


FDA,
n.pr See Food and Drug Administration.

FDA,
n.pr the abbreviation for the Food and Drug Administration.
 stated in the 483: "Risk Analysis Reports for SynchroMed pumps and intrathecal intrathecal /in·tra·the·cal/ (-the´k'l) within a sheath; through the theca of the spinal cord into the subarachnoid space.
Intrathecal 
 catheters have not identified inflammatory mass/granuloma/fibrosis as an actual or potential hazard. This is contrary to the requirements of risk management procedures."

Next, CAPA procedures addressing the investigation of the cause of nonconformities relating to relating to relate prepconcernant

relating to relate prepbezüglich +gen, mit Bezug auf +acc 
 product, processes and the quality system were not implemented. For example, product comment reports were not evaluated as required by the procedure titled "PCR PCR polymerase chain reaction.

PCR
abbr.
polymerase chain reaction


Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) 
 [product comment reporting] CAPA Evaluation Decision Point." These were not ranked by frequency of occurrence, severity and detectability.

In a related observation, the FDAer noted that procedures addressing the identification of CAPAs were not implemented. Specifically, product comment reports were closed with such phrases as "Investigation not required," and "Does not appear to be a product performance issue." In some cases, there was no documented rationale for the lack of corrective action A corrective action is a change implemented to address a weakness identified in a management system. Normally corrective actions are instigated in response to a customer complaint, abnormal levels if internal nonconformity, nonconformities identified during an internal audit or , which is required by SOP, the 483 added.

Complaint handling also was found to be lacking. "Complaint-handling procedures have not been implemented to ensure that all complaints are evaluated to determine whether the complaint should be filed as a medical device report (MDR MDR,
n See multidrug resistance.

MDR,
n the abbreviation for minimum daily requirement, specifically the Minimum Daily Requirements for Specific Nutrients compiled by the United States Food and Drug Administration.
)."

The report noted that several medical and scientific literature articles were not entered as product comment reports and evaluated for reportability under medical device reporting.

Also, there was no data or statistical analysis to support a conclusion that "inflammatory mass has been reduced ..." as sated sate 1  
tr.v. sat·ed, sat·ing, sates
1. To satisfy (an appetite) fully.

2. To satisfy to excess.
 in an Oct. 3, 2006, memo from the director of reliability engineering Reliability engineering is an engineering field, that deals with the study reliability: the ability of a system or component to perform its required functions under stated conditions for a specified period of time.[1] It is often reported in terms of a probability. .

As of Dec. 15, 2006, there were an undisclosed number of cases of inflammatory mass/granuloma/fibrosis reported into the PCR system for devices implanted in the U.S. Using that data, FDA determined that the calculated rate of occurrence was over four times grater than the incidence rate reported in a Jan. 19, 2001 "Dear Colleague" letter.

Data compiled for the third quarter of 2002 through the second quarter of 2007 also failed to support a conclusion that inflammatory mass had been reduced.

Further, FDA documents noted that not all of the actions needed to correct and prevent the recurrence recurrence /re·cur·rence/ (-ker´ens) the return of symptoms after a remission.recur´rent

re·cur·rence
n.
1.
 of nonconforming product and other quality problems were identified.

For example, there was no C/PAS, CAPA or Watchlist to address ongoing product performance concerns involving inflammatory mass/granuloma/fibrosis.

In a related observation, FDA noted that a correction or removal conducted to reduce a risk to health posed by a device was not reported in writing to FDA.

"In July 2003, a letter with an enclosed 'Educational Brief" was sent to customers. Also enclosed were reprints of two articles published in the December 2002 issue of 'Pain Medicine' and revised labeling for the SynchroMed Technical Manual. The revised labeling included recommendations concerning the recognition, treatment and mitigation of inflammatory mass," the report stated.

The warning letter stated that the "Educational Brief" in question was believed by the firm to be an update to a Jan. 19, 2001, letter that had been reviewed by FDA prior to issuance. The firm did not believe that the new letter was a correction or removal of the previous letter that required additional FDA authorization.

FDA disagreed with this conclusion, the warning letter noted. Although the Educational Brief contained language consistent with the approved labeling in PMA PMA (papillary-marginal-attached),
n a system of epidemiologic scoring of periodontal disease devised by Schour and Massler in which the symbols denote the areas involved in gingival inflammation.

PMA Progressive muscular atrophy
 Supplement P860004/S)53, this new labeling had not been previously communicated to doctors whose patients already had a SynchroMed pump implanted within them.

Medtronic Neurological, Minneapolis, MN, 11/21-12/25/06, Doc. 109990M, $5 plus retrieval.

* The Checklist--Medtronic Neurological

* CAPA procedures related to QS flawed

* Actions to prevent recurring problems not taken
COPYRIGHT 2007 Washington Information Source, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Medical devices
Publication:Validation Times
Date:Nov 1, 2007
Words:644
Previous Article:Process design controls, incomplete validation trip up AmeriWater.
Next Article:Cytosol Labs slighted for calibration flaws.
Topics:



Related Articles
Medical Measurements receives 14-item 483 for CAPAs, equipment calibration, QS flaws.
Medical Measurements hit in 14-item 483 for quality system failures, equipment calibration, CAPAs.
DMRs, CAPAs and MDRs highlight 14-item 483 for Ram Precision.
Shelhigh gets 12-item 483 for risk analysis, lack of control of design process.
CAPAs, cleaning, calibration cited in 14-item 483 for Ram Precision.
Resonance Technology nets 7-item 483 for CAPAs, quality plans/procedures.
Beyond CAPA: using risk assessment to streamline your quality system.
Medtronic cited for faulty risk analysis and CAPAs.
CAPA flaws noted in 12-item FDA write-up.
CAPA flaws cited for HaloSource: HaloSource, Raymond, WA, Bothell, WA, District.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles