CALIFORNIA WOMAN CAN SUE TO RECOVER PAINTINGS NAZIS SEIZED.A California woman can sue Austria and the Austrian Gallery under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) of 1976 is a statute under United States law that sets the limitations on how a foreign sovereign nation (or its agents, instrumentalities, or subdivisions) may be sued in U.S. courts. for return of valuable paintings seized by Nazis and sold to the art gallery in 1943, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Dec. 12. Enacted in 1976 and amended 20 years later, the FSIA FSIA Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act provides a limited means for U.S. courts to obtain jurisdiction over foreign nations and specifies exceptions to their immunity, including cases involving property taken in violation of international law. Among other things, the Austrian government and gallery argued the law couldn't reply retroactively to acts of the Austrian government during the Nazi era, when Germany took over the country and seized property of Jews - including six paintings by the Austrian artist Franz Klimt owned by Maria V. Altmann's uncle. A federal judge rejected the Austrians' argument, and a three-judge Ninth Circuit panel affirmed the decision. "A statute does not operate 'retrospectively,' and thus impermissibly im·per·mis·si·ble adj. Not permitted; not permissible: impermissible behavior. im , simply because it applies to conduct antedating the statute's enactment," Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw wrote for the three-judge panel in Altmann v. Republic of Austria et al. (01-56003). If a law takes away rights or adds new obligations, it cannot be applied to past transactions, she noted, citing Supreme Court precedents. But the FSIA didn't change substantive law The part of the law that creates, defines, and regulates rights, including, for example, the law of contracts, torts, wills, and real property; the essential substance of rights under law. existing at the time the paintings were seized. "Determining whether the FSAI FSAI Food Safety Authority of Ireland may properly be applied thus turns on the question whether Austria could legitimately expect to receive immunity from the executive branch of the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. for its complicity in and perpetuation of the discriminatory expropriation The taking of private property for public use or in the public interest. The taking of U.S. industry situated in a foreign country, by a foreign government. Expropriation is the act of a government taking private property; Eminent Domain is the legal term describing the of the Klimt paintings," Wardlaw wrote. "Mindful that such seizures explicitly violated both Austria's and Germany's obligations under the Hague Convention . . . and that Austria's Second Republic officially repudiated all Nazi transactions in 1946, we hold that Austria could not expect such immunity." |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion