Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,585,946 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

CAGW Sends Cable a la Carte Back to the Kitchen.


WASHINGTON -- Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW CAGW Citizens Against Government Waste ) today urged the Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission (FCC), independent executive agency of the U.S. government established in 1934 to regulate interstate and foreign communications in the public interest.  (FCC (1) (Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, www.fcc.gov) The U.S. government agency that regulates interstate and international communications including wire, cable, radio, TV and satellite. The FCC was created under the U.S. ) not to mandate "a la carte," the sale of individual channels, in the cable television industry. On September 11, the FCC began considering a proposal to ban programmers from bundling channels together in the current tiered system.

"Just as dining a la carte is more expensive than a three-course prix fix meal, a la carte in the cable industry will be more expensive than the current tiered or bundled programming system for subscribers," said CAGW President Tom Schatz.

A la carte pricing would drastically change television advertising, ultimately making such a system more expensive than a tiered system for consumers. For example, a company might run an ad on ESPN ESPN Entertainment and Sports Programming Network  hoping to reach primarily sports fans, but also reach others who might have a casual interest in the channel or those who might be surfing through channels. Reaching such a broad audience would be nearly impossible through a la carte TV as casual observers and channel surfers would be lost. Instead, advertising would be based on channels' take-rates (the percentage of cable subscribers who subscribe to one particular channel). Advertisers will be unwilling to pay the prices they currently pay for their advertising to get on the air if it is going to reach a smaller audience.

With reduced funding from advertisements, in order to maintain a profitable business, cable companies will have no choice but to obtain a larger portion of their funding from consumers by increasing the price of channel subscriptions. With a 25 percent take-rate, for example, investment banking firm Bear Stearns projects that a monthly subscription to the Disney Channel would increase from $1.48 to $5.90. MTV MTV
 in full Music Television

U.S. cable television network, established in 1980 to present videos of musicians and singers performing new rock music. MTV won a wide following among rock-music fans worldwide and greatly affected the popular-music business.
 would jump from $0.43 to $2.32, and most notably a subscription to ESPN would skyrocket from $3.78 to $15.82.

An a la carte system would also impair consumer choice. It would be more difficult for smaller independent and niche channels to stay afloat financially with an a la carte pricing structure. While large, popular channels such as CNN CNN
 or Cable News Network

Subsidiary company of Turner Broadcasting Systems. It was created by Ted Turner in 1980 to present 24-hour live news broadcasts, using satellites to transmit reports from news bureaus around the world.
 or ESPN could still be viable in this new business climate, channels like the Food Network or Lifetime could go off the air if they did not get enough subscribers to make them profitable.

"The cable television industry has thrived, diverse networks have grown, and consumers have benefited from the tiered system. Now is not the time for the FCC to mandate a la carte and take a step backward for all," concluded Schatz.

Citizens Against Government Waste is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization Nonprofit Organization

An association that is given tax-free status. Donations to a non-profit organization are often tax deductible as well.

Notes:
Examples of non-profit organizations are charities, hospitals and schools.
 dedicated to eliminating waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement mis·man·age  
tr.v. mis·man·aged, mis·man·ag·ing, mis·man·ag·es
To manage badly or carelessly.



mis·manage·ment n.
 in government.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Sep 20, 2007
Words:441
Previous Article:Community Catalysts Housing Alliance Adds Daisy Gordon Crompton to Board of Directors.
Next Article:Questionmark Plans Sixth Annual Users Conference in San Antonio.
Topics:



Related Articles
Start-ups struggle to find carriage, but VoD is a start.
Viewer discretion: parents should be able to pay for Nickelodeon without having to pony up for MTV.
Cable chief bets on a-la-carte pricing.
Disarray.
BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ON NATIONAL GEO.
LISA RINNA HAPPILY CALLED TO THE (RED) CARPET FOR EMMYS.
ON DVD > WATCHING AT HOME.
FOR PHOENIX, THERE'S LIFE AFTER JOHNNY CASH.
LA.COMFIDENTIAL > CELEBS.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles