Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,670,671 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

C-COR Patent Victory Upheld by Court of Appeals.


STATE COLLEGE, Pa. -- C-COR Incorporated (Nasdaq:CCBL CCBL Crescent Commercial Bank Limited (Pakistan)
CCBL Cambodia Campaign to Ban Landmines
CCBL Configuration Control Baseline
CCBL CPEDB Configuration Baseline Listing
CCBL Chinese Christian Basketball League
), a global provider of interoperable solutions that simplify the transition to on demand networks, announced the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on January 9, 2006, affirmed the holding of the U. S. District Court for the District of Delaware that SeaChange International This article or section is written like an .
Please help [ rewrite this article] from a neutral point of view.
Mark blatant advertising for , using .
 (Nasdaq: SEAC SEAC Student Environmental Action Coalition
SEAC Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee
SEAC Southeast Archeological Center (National Park Service)
SEAC South East Asia Command (Allies WWII) 
) "willfully willfully adv. referring to doing something intentionally, purposefully and stubbornly. Examples: "He drove the car willfully into the crowd on the sidewalk." "She willfully left the dangerous substances on the property." (See: willful) " infringed C-COR's patent for a video server system architecture.

"We're pleased that the court upheld our intellectual property rights," stated Mike Pohl, President of C-COR's Global Strategies group. "This ruling, coupled with the Court of Appeals' ruling last summer that C-COR did not infringe SeaChange's patent, makes clear that the only infringement that's been committed has been by SeaChange."

The Court of Appeals also affirmed the District Court's award of attorneys' fees and double damages Noun 1. double damages - twice the amount that a court would normally find the injured party entitled to
exemplary damages, punitive damages, smart money - (law) compensation in excess of actual damages (a form of punishment awarded in cases of malicious or willful
 in the case. In patent cases courts may award enhanced damages where "egregious conduct" has been shown. The C-COR patent involved in the January 9th Court of Appeals ruling is US patent 5,805,804.

About C-COR

C-COR offers world-class, market-focused business solutions for cable operators, telephone companies, broadcasters, and other private and public sector entities that put subscribers in personal control of their entertainment, information, and communication needs. C-COR simplifies the transition to Internet Protocol (IP) demand-oriented networks by delivering interoperable, modular products in sync with IP network upgrade cycles. These solutions bring together software applications, access and transport technology, and a nationwide corps of expert field engineers to enable the delivery of business services; digital program/ad insertion; management and delivery of VOD See video-on-demand.

VoD - video on demand
, VoIP, and HSD HSD Human Services Department
HSD High Speed Data
HSD Hillsboro School District (Hillsboro, OR)
HSD Hybrid Synergy Drive (Toyota/Lexus)
HSD High School Diploma
HSD Historical Society of Delaware
; network capacity expansion; centralized office automation for workforce management, network assurance, and subscriber fulfillment; and a variety of outsourced field services that help keep networks operating at peak performance. C-COR's common stock is listed on the Nasdaq National Market (Symbol:CCBL) and is a component of the Russell 2000 Stock Index. For additional information regarding C-COR, visit www.c-cor.com.

Some of the information presented in this announcement constitutes forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor Safe Harbor

1. A legal provision to reduce or eliminate liability as long as good faith is demonstrated.

2. A form of shark repellent implemented by a target company acquiring a business that is so poorly regulated that the target itself is less attractive.
 provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) implemented several significant substantive changes affecting certain cases brought under the federal securities laws, including changes related to pleading, discovery, liability, class representation and awards fees and  of 1995. Forward-looking statements represent the Company's judgment regarding future events, and are based on currently available information. Although the Company believes it has a reasonable basis for these forward-looking statements, the Company cannot guarantee their accuracy and actual results may differ materially from those the Company anticipated due to a number of known and unknown uncertainties. Factors which could cause actual results to differ from expectations include, among others, capital spending capital spending

Spending for long-term assets such as factories, equipment, machinery, and buildings that permits the production of more goods and services in future years.
 patterns of the communications industry, changes in regard to significant customers, the demand for network integrity, the trend toward more fiber in the network, the Company's ability to develop new and enhanced products, the Company's ability to provide complete network solutions, continued industry consolidation, the development of competing technology, the global demand for the Company's products and services, the Company's ability to implement its restructuring and cost reduction measures, and the Company's ability to complete and integrate acquisitions and achieve its strategic objectives. For additional information concerning these and other important factors that may cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from expectations and underlying assumptions, please refer to the reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
COPYRIGHT 2006 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jan 10, 2006
Words:538
Previous Article:Azimuth Systems Strengthens Leadership Position with Several Major Milestones; Wi-Fi Test Equipment Leader Ships 1,000th Test Module, Expands Product...
Next Article:Sprint Unveils Significant Super Bowl XL Halftime Show Sweepstakes, Prizes; ''Sprint's Super Bowl with The Rolling Stones Sweepstakes'' Prizes...
Topics:



Related Articles
COURT REJECTS DAVIS' DENIAL OF PAROLE FOR ROSENKRANTZ.(News)
PANAVISION WINS CASE AGAINST WEB `PIRATE'.(Business)
APPEALS COURT UPHOLDS DECISION IN LITTON CASE.(NEWS)
SAUDI ARABIA - Al Jubail Petrochemical Co. (Kemya).
Court upholds $19.7 million copyright award to Lowry's Reports Inc.(The Law)
Gay marriage ban stands.(Courts)(A judge deals another setback to gay-rights advocates, upholding a constitutional amendment approved last year)
Don't renew recall effort.(Editorials)(The system worked for Measure 37 supporters)(Editorial)
BRIEFCASE.(Business)
EDITORIAL EXIT EXAM SHOWDOWN NEXT STOP, STATE SUPREME COURT.(Editorial)(Editorial)
New York court upholds decision favoring women's rights.(Catholic Health Care)(Brief article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles