Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,715,918 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

By the numbers: a data bank on education trends for district leaders.


THIS MONTH: Technology Inventory

Student-to-computer ratio: 3.3/1

Source: QED QED
abbr.
Latin quod erat demonstrandum (which was to be demonstrated)


QED which was to be shown or proved [Latin quod erat demonstrandum]

Noun 1.
 
Instructional Technology Expenditures

1991-92   2.1
1992-93   2.5
1993-94   2.8
1994-95   3.6
1995-96   4.3
1996-97   4.8
1997-98   5.4
1998-99   6.7    8.36
1999-00   5.6    7.85
2000-01   4.7    6.95
2001-02   4.2    6.45
2002-03   3.53   5.74
2003-04   3.55   5.80

Source: Quality Education Data, 2003, www.qeddata.com

Note: Table made from bar graph.

HIGH-SPEED INTERNET ACCESS

                  2001   2002   2003

Elementary         67%    71%    76%
Middle/Jr. High    79     84     86
Senior High        82     85     88

Source: MDR

SPENDING PER STUDENT

District technology coordinators in urban areas
expect to spend $89 per student on total
technology instruction in the 2003-04 school year.

Total            $89.60

Hardware         $33.70

Network &
Internet         $12.30

Professional
development       $9.30

Services and
support          $12.10

Wireless          $4.00

Instructional
software         $10.40

Administrative
software          $7.80

Source: QED

Note: Table made from bar graph.

PDAs & Handhelds

Administrators   54%
No units         43
Teachers         20
Students         12

Source: QED

Wireless Networks

                  2002   2003

Elementary         12%    23%
Middle/Jr. High    18     33
Senior High        21     36

Source: MDR

What's in Your District?

Digital cameras              94%
LCD projectors               92
Digital whiteboards          54
Portable keyboards           35
Voice recognition software   27
Video streaming              27
Thin-client devices          11
Tablet PCs                    5

Source: QED

Brand Loyalty

Dell        40%
Macintosh   30%
HP/Compaq   19%
Gateway     11%

Source: Market Data Retrieval, 2003, www.schooldata.com

Note: Table made from pie chart.

Funding Sources

District        45%
State           34%
E-rate          10%
Other federal
programs         5%
NCLB funds       3%
Other sources    3%

Source: MDR, 2003, www.shooldata.com

NOTE: Table made from pie chart.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Professional Media Group LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Dianis, Laura
Publication:District Administration
Date:Dec 1, 2003
Words:281
Previous Article:Calendar of events.(Calendar)
Next Article:NCLB at 2.(Editor's Letter)



Related Articles
NCE 2003 pre-conference workshops.
Data-driven districts: four districts that take different tacks using data to inform key decisions.
Reading and sharing, city-wide. (Language Arts).
The misdiagnosis of special education costs: district practices have no bearing, but medical and social factors accelerate spending.
Bringing home the bacon: the going rate for Grade-A education leaders, the latest controversial contract points and more.(3rd Annual Salary Report)
By the numbers.(Illustration)
By the numbers on NAEP/Math & reading: a data bank on education trends for district leaders.(Illustration)
Preparing for tests with tests.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)
The ninth-grade bottleneck: an enrollment bulge in a transition year that demands careful attention and action.
Staffing patterns.(student-teacher ratio)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles