Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,758,148 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Buy-sell agreements and transfer tax valuation.


It is common for owners of closely held A phrase used to describe the ownership, management, and operation of a corporation by a small group of people.

In a closely held corporation, the same people often act as shareholders, directors, and officers, and no outside investors exist.
 businesses to restrict the transfer of interests in such businesses through buy-sell agreements, and to rely on such agreements in determining value for estate and gift tax purposes. However, this reliance is often misplaced mis·place  
tr.v. mis·placed, mis·plac·ing, mis·plac·es
1.
a. To put into a wrong place: misplace punctuation in a sentence.

b.
 and may cause severe ramifications ramifications nplAuswirkungen pl .

Sec. 2703(a) provides that the value of property for estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer tax Example: Property is placed in a trust for the donor's child and grandchildren. The income may be "sprinkled" among the child and grandchildren in accordance with their needs and the principal of the trust will be distributed outright to the grandchildren following the child's death.  purposes will be determined without regard to (1) any option, agreement or other right to acquire or use the property at a price less than fair market value (FMV FMV - full-motion video ), or (2) any restriction on the right to sell or use the property. Sec. 2703(b), however, provides an exception for any option, agreement, right or restriction that meets all of the following requirements:

[] It is a bona fide business arrangement.

[] It is not a device to transfer property to members of the decedent's family for less than full and adequate consideration in money or money's worth.

[] Its terms are comparable to similar arrangements entered into by persons in an arm's-length transaction.

A right or restriction will be regarded as meeting each of these requirements if more than 50% in value of the subject property is owned by individuals who are not members of the transferor's family and who are subject to the same right or restriction (Regs. Sec. 25.2703-1(b)(3)).

Sec. 2703 has an effective date of Oct. 8, 1990; any buy-sell agreement entered into or modified on or after that date will be subject to its provisions. Many commentators feel that Sec. 2703 merely codified cod·i·fy  
tr.v. cod·i·fied, cod·i·fy·ing, cod·i·fies
1. To reduce to a code: codify laws.

2. To arrange or systematize.
 existing law and that any buy-sell agreement that does not fall within the stated exception will be disregarded in determining transfer tax value.

A buy-sell agreement among family members that sets a value of less than FMV will almost certainly fail to come within the exception. Since the buy-sell agreement will presumably pre·sum·a·ble  
adj.
That can be presumed or taken for granted; reasonable as a supposition: presumable causes of the disaster.
 still be enforceable, an estate could pay a transfer tax on FMV while receiving a lesser amount for the stock or partnership interest. In certain situations, the cash received could be less than the tax on such stock or interest.

Also, if the stock or partnership interest is to pass to a surviving spouse or marital trust, the marital deduction will be limited to the buy-sell price. The excess of FMV over such price will reduce the amount of other assets passing to the credit shelter trust. An unexpected tax could also be produced if the amount of such excess exceeds the decedent's unused credit shelter amount.

The effect of Sec. 2703 must be considered when dealing with closely held business clients with buy-sell agreements currently in effect or under consideration.

From Frank L. Washelesky, CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000. , J.D., Ostrow Reisin Berk Abrams, Ltd., Chicago, Ill.
COPYRIGHT 1995 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1995, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Washelesky, Frank L.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Oct 1, 1995
Words:458
Previous Article:Deadline for contribution substantiation approaches.
Next Article:Minimizing the government's bonanza in clients' retirement accounts.
Topics:



Related Articles
Buy-sell agreements: constructive dividend dangers lurk; how to structure an agreement to avoid adverse tax consequences.
Redemptions versus cross-purchase agreements. (from The Tax Adviser)
Buy-sell agreement with a twist.
Modifications of legal relationships can have Chapter 14 implications.
Avoiding constructive dividends when a corporation purchases stock under a buy-sell agreement.
Substantial modifications of buy-sell agreements.
Reviewing a buy/sell agreement.(case study)
Buy-sell agreements--an invaluable tool.(part 1 )
Buy-sell agreements: an invaluable tool.(part 2)
Make the most of buy-sell agreements: these complex contracts solve many problems.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles