Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,538,038 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Burrell v. Hampshire County.


U.S. Appeals Court

PRETRIAL pre·tri·al  
n.
A proceeding held before an official trial, especially to clarify points of law and facts.

adj.
1. Of or relating to a pretrial.

2.
 DETAINEE de·tain·ee  
n.
A person held in custody or confinement: a political detainee.

Noun 1. detainee - some held in custody
political detainee
 

SEPARATION

Burrell v. Hampshire County, 307 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2002). A pretrial detainee who was severely beaten by a fellow detainee brought a [section] 1983 action against a county and county officials, alleging deliberate indifference to his health and safety in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment, addition to the U.S. Constitution, adopted 1868. The amendment comprises five sections. Section 1


Section 1 of the amendment declares that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are American citizens and citizens
. The detainee also alleged an Eighth Amendment violation resutling from failure to segregate seg·re·gate  
v. seg·re·gat·ed, seg·re·gat·ing, seg·re·gates

v.tr.
1. To separate or isolate from others or from a main body or group. See Synonyms at isolate.

2.
 violent and nonviolent detainees. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants and the appeals court affirmed. The detainee had told one jail official that he was threatened by a fellow detainee who had a history of assaults, but the officials failed to separate them. The court noted that the plaintiff told one official he had a black belt in martial arts and was a decorated war hero and never requested protective custody An arrangement whereby a person is safeguarded by law enforcement authorities in a location other than the person's home because his or her safety is seriously threatened. . The court found that the county's policy of not screening or segregating potentially violent inmates from non-violent ones did not constitute deliberate indifference to the health and safety of detainees, because inmates were housed in single cells and were able to lock their cells from the inside at any time. (Hampshire County Jail/House of Corrections, Massachusetts)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:deliberate indifference and violation of the Fourteenth Amendment
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U1MA
Date:Feb 1, 2003
Words:200
Previous Article:Koch v. Lewis.(solitary confinement and right to due process)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Montalvo v. Snyder.(prisoners alleges Bureau of Prisons for wrongfull classification of crime)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Burrell v. Hampshire County.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(Brief Article)
Burrel v. Hampshire County.(FACILITIES)(Brief Article)
Velez v. Johnson.(cases of assault )(Brief Article)
Cagle v. Sutherland.(SUPERVISION)(Brief Article)
Alsina Ortiz v. Laboy.(deliberate indifference, violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Drake v. Velasco.(CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT)(Brief Article)
Drake v. Velasco.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)
Hammond v. Gordon County.(female inmates alleges male officers of violating their Eighth Amendment rights)
Hammond v. Gordon County.(female inmates alleges male officers of violating their Eighth Amendment rights)
Crow v. Montgomery.(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles