Printer Friendly
The Free Library
21,446,310 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Building converted from industrial use not stabilized.

#23866

Tenant complained that landlord didn't offer him a proper rent-stabilized renewal lease. The DRA ruled for tenant after landlord failed to answer the complaint, and ordered landlord to send tenant a proper renewal lease. Landlord appealed and won. Landlord explained that it didn't answer tenant's complaint because the DRA sent it to the wrong address. Landlord also showed that the building had been a warehouse until 2003, when landlord converted it to residential use. So the building wasn't subject to rent stabilization. Landlord had registered the building with the DHCR at some point because it applied for J-51 tax benefits. But landlord's J-51 application was rejected by the city, so the building never became subject to rent stabilization.

* Conway: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. ZC210022RO (12/6/11) [2-pg. doc.]

COPYRIGHT 2012 Vendome Group LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:RENT STABILIZATION COVERAGE
Publication:New York Landlord v. Tenant
Article Type:Brief article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 1, 2012
Words:131
Previous Article:Apartment subject to deregulation after J-51 expired.
Next Article:Market-rent tenant in J-51 building is rent stabilized.
Topics:

Terms of use | Copyright © 2013 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles