Browne Greene Will Give Opening Statement Friday, June 13, 2008 in Children's Motrin Product Liability Trial.11-Year Old Sabrina Brierton Johnson's Case is First to Be Tried against Johnson & Johnson and McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals Claiming That an Allergic Reaction allergic reaction n. A local or generalized reaction of an organism to internal or external contact with a specific allergen to which the organism has been previously sensitized. to Children's Motrin Caused Her Blindness MALIBU, Calif. -- Browne Greene will give his Opening Statement on Friday, June 13, 2008 at 9:00 AM in 11-year old Sabrina Brierton Johnson's Children's Motrin product liability lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson [NYSE NYSE See: New York Stock Exchange : JNJ JNJ Johnson and Johnson (stock symbol) JNJ Journal of Nursing Jocularity ] in Los Angeles Superior Court/West District, Malibu Courthouse, Department W, 23525 Civic Center Way, Malibu, CA. 90265. McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals, a division of McNeil-PPC (a wholly owned subsidiary Wholly Owned Subsidiary A subsidiary whose parent company owns 100% of its common stock. Notes: In other words, the parent company owns the company outright and there are no minority owners. of Johnson & Johnson), is a co-defendant in the case. Miss Johnson claims that she suffered an allergic reaction (Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Ste·vens-John·son syndrome n. A severe inflammatory eruption of the skin and mucous membranes, usually occurring in children and young adults following a respiratory infection or as an allergic reaction to drugs or other substances. ) to taking Children's Motrin in 2003 which caused her to become blind and photosensitive A material that changes when exposed to light. See photoelectric. , among other serious injuries. Sabrina Brierton Johnson vs. Johnson & Johnson, et. al., Case Number TC 018540. The trial, which began June 5, 2008, is expected to last six-weeks and is being heard before the Hon. Cesar C. Sarmiento. Sabrina's parents, Kenneth and Joan Brierton Johnson, are acting as her guardians ad litem [Latin, For the suit; for the purposes of the suit; pending the suit.] A Guardian Ad Litem is a guardian appointed to prosecute or defend a suit on behalf of a party who is legally incapable of doing so, such as an infant or an insane person. . Her complaint for damages was filed December 28, 2004 for strict product liability, negligence and personal injury. The Plaintiff is also seeking punitive damages Monetary compensation awarded to an injured party that goes beyond that which is necessary to compensate the individual for losses and that is intended to punish the wrongdoer. . Miss Johnson is represented by Browne Greene and Alan Van Gelder with the Santa Monica, CA. law firm of Greene Broillet & Wheeler (http://www.greene-broillet.com) and Daniel Balaban with the Law Offices of Brian Witzer in West Hollywood, CA. On September 8, 2003, Topanga, CA. resident Sabrina Brierton Johnson (then age-six) came home from school complaining of a fever and was given Children's Motrin by her parents in accordance with the materials and instructions included with the drug. The next morning, she awoke with a high fever, a pink color in her eyes, and red lips covered in sores and was seen by her pediatrician. She was immediately hospitalized at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Cedars-Sinai Medical Center is a world-renowned hospital located in Los Angeles, California. History Cedars-Sinai is the result of a merger in 1961 between two major Los Angeles hospitals, Cedars of Lebanon and Mount Sinai Home for the Incurables, with Steve Broidy as in Los Angeles, CA. with a high fever, redness of the sclera sclera: see eye. (white of the eye), sore throat and a rash covering her back, trunk and lower pelvis. By September 10, 2003, per the complaint, Sabrina was blind in both eyes, and was subsequently diagnosed with Stevens-Johnson Syndrome resulting from ingesting the Children's Motrin. Since then, Sabrina has undergone more than 20 surgical procedures and countless hospitalizations as a result of the injuries she suffered from ingesting Children's Motrin, and Sabrina is legally blind. "Sabrina Brierton Johnson's lawsuit is the first case to go to trial against Johnson & Johnson for injuries we maintain were caused by taking Children's Motrin," explained Browne Greene. "She is one of multiple victims who will be seeking justice from Johnson & Johnson in 2008 and 2009 for injuries attributed to Children's Motrin, including cases that are taking place in California, Illinois, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas and Utah. The public should know that in prior years, Johnson & Johnson has been well-aware of other children who have been injured by Children's Motrin such as the tragic example of Kaitlyn Langstaff, a nine-year old California girl who died from complications after taking Children's Motrin in 2003, and whose wrongful death case was quietly settled out of court by Johnson & Johnson." "The gloves are off," continued Browne Greene. "Make no doubt about it that we intend to reveal the truth that Johnson & Johnson so desperately wishes to hide which is that Children's Motrin is not a benign, harmless drug, but a dangerous one. It is time to hold Johnson & Johnson accountable for misleading the public and for the horrific harm it has wreaked upon the most vulnerable and trusting segment of society, our children." Since the 1980s, Miss Johnson contends that Johnson & Johnson and McNeil have known about the risks and dangers associated with Children's Mortin (Ibuprofen ibuprofen (ī`by prō'fən), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that reduces pain, fever, and inflammation. ). Plaintiff alleges that Defendants
were put on notice about the serious side-effects of Children's
Motrin by the scientific community, by numerous adverse event reports
that were coming in directly to McNeil about the drug, and that, in
fact, Defendants were warning about its dangers in other countries.
As a prescription-only drug, Children's Motrin carried a warning about Stevens-Johnson Syndrome on its package insert. Plaintiff alleges that In the 1990s, McNeil petitioned the FDA FDA abbr. Food and Drug Administration FDA, n.pr See Food and Drug Administration. FDA, n.pr the abbreviation for the Food and Drug Administration. for approval to have Children's Motrin sold over-the-counter (OTC OTC See: Over-the-counter. OTC See over-the-counter market (OTC). )and failed to provide the FDA information about the dangers of Ibuprofen found in a major pediatric pediatric /pe·di·at·ric/ (pe?de-at´rik) pertaining to the health of children. pe·di·at·ric adj. Of or relating to pediatrics. clinical study of the drug (Boston University Fever Study). In 1995, Children's Motrin was approved by the FDA for OTC sale to consumers, but it did not carry any warning about the risk of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. The Plaintiff further contends that despite promising to conduct an investigation into the dangers of Children's Motrin, the Defendants did nothing until forced by the FDA to make labeling changes to Children's Motrin in 2006. Editor's Note # 1 Ibuprofen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, usually abbreviated to NSAIDs, are drugs with analgesic, antipyretic and anti-inflammatory effects - they reduce pain, fever and inflammation. (NSAID NSAID: see nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. ) and is sold over-the-counter under such brand names as: Children's Motrin, Motrin, Advil, Genpril, Haltran, Medipren, Midol 200, Nuprin and PediaProfen. Stevens-Johnson Syndrome is a potentially devastating dev·as·tate tr.v. dev·as·tat·ed, dev·as·tat·ing, dev·as·tates 1. To lay waste; destroy. 2. To overwhelm; confound; stun: was devastated by the rude remark. allergic reaction to ibuprofen that can result in serious gastrointestinal problems, blindness or death. More information about Stevens-Johnson Syndrome can be found at http://www.sjsupport.org. Editor's Note #2 Plaintiff Sabrina Brierton Johnson is represented by Browne Greene and Alan Van Gelder with the Santa Monica, CA. law firm of Greene Broillet & Wheeler, LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol (http://www.greene-broillet.com), Tel: 310-576-1200; and Daniel Balaban with the Law Offices of Brian Witzer in West Hollywood, CA. Defendants Johnson & Johnson and McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals are represented by Charles E. Preuss and Thomas W. Pulliam, Jr., with the San Francisco, CA. law firm of Drinker Biddle, Tel: 415-591-7500; and Christy D. Jones with the Jackson, MS law firm of Butler Snow; Tel: 601-948-5711. Editor's Note #3 For more information about Kaitlyn Langstaff, go to http://www.kaitlynlangstaff.org. Editor's Note #4 The below-listed cases alleging that Johnson and Johnson's and McNeil's Ibuprofen products caused Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and other serious injuries are set for trial as follows: September 8, 2008, Lofton v. McNeil, et. al., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Case No. 305-CV-1521 (Dallas). Fall 2008, Zundell v. Johnson & Johnson and McNeil, et. al, Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County (New Jersey), Case No. L-6854-05 (New Brunswick). January 26, 2009, Gaines v. McNeil, et. al., San Francisco Superior Court (California), Case No. 06-457600 (San Francisco). March 2, 2009, Jones v. McNeil, et. al., Jefferson County of Alabama, Circuit Court Case No. 2007-900565 (Birmingham). March 30, 2009, Robinson v. McNeil, et. al., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Case No. 1:07-cv-05603 (Chicago). May 11, 2009, Mullins v. McNeil, et. al., U. S. District Court for the District of Utah, Case No. 2:06cv266 (Salt Lake City). June 6, 2009, Brakefield v. Johnson & Johnson, McNeil, et. al., San Francisco Superior Court (California), Case No. CGC-07-469926 (San Francisco). July 6, 2009, Spencer v. McNeil, et. al., Court of Common Pleas COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. The name of an English court which was established on the breaking up of the aula regis, for the determination of pleas merely civil. It was at first ambulatory, but was afterwards located. for Philadelphia County (Pennsylvania), Case No. 01622 (Philadelphia). September 21, 2009, Wolfe v. McNeil, et. al., U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 07-348 (Philadelphia). |
|
||||||||||||||

prō'fən)
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion