Broadband lagging in U.S. (First in/First out).A disturbing new report from the Commerce Department's Technology Administration has found that broadband service See broadband and broadband service provider. in the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. is falling behind other countries, and recommends new services and pricing models to spur adoption. The report, "Understanding Broadband Demand: A Review of Critical Issues" was issued in late September. It has found that supply currently exceeds demand in all but the most rural areas, and that compelling content is lacking. The report has found many shortcomings A shortcoming is a character flaw. Shortcomings may also be:
Another disturbing aspect of the report is that the U.S., while still leading in the total number of broadband connections, has fallen behind many countries in percentage terms. The U.S. currently has 10.4% of Internet-connected households on broadband. South Korea has the largest number of broadband households in percentage terms, at 51.7%. But the U.S. is now also trailing Canada, at 19.7%. In fact, the nation is not even in the top five, lagging behind Hong Kong Hong Kong (hŏng kŏng), Mandarin Xianggang, special administrative region of China, formerly a British crown colony (2005 est. pop. 6,899,000), land area 422 sq mi (1,092 sq km), adjacent to Guangdong prov. (26%), Taiwan (18.2%) and Sweden (13.4%). The report does not take into account the level of availability of broadband service in each country. However, according to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. the latest numbers available from the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (September, 2002), more than 75 million U.S. households can now get broadband via cable modem cable modem Modem used to convert analog data signals to digital form and vise versa, for transmission or receipt over cable television lines, especially for connecting to the Internet. service if they want it. Data from a 2001 Morgan Stanley in full Digital Subscriber Line Broadband digital communications connection that operates over standard copper telephone wires. It requires a DSL modem, which splits transmissions into two frequency bands: the lower frequencies for voice (ordinary or cable by the end of 2002 (although other data has suggested that only 31% will have a competitive choice between these platforms). The report also makes clear that today's broadband access See broadband and wireless broadband. methods and throughput levels are likely to be inadequate for the applications recommended. According to the report: "The current generation of broadband technologies (cable and DSL) may prove woefully woe·ful also wo·ful adj. 1. Affected by or full of woe; mournful. 2. Causing or involving woe. 3. Deplorably bad or wretched: insufficient to carry many of the advanced applications driving future demand. Today's broadband will be tomorrow's traffic jam. [While] long-haul data transport capacity exploded in the 1990s, last-mile capacity upgrades have proceeded much more slowly." The report says that estimates for new investments needed to build out a significantly more robust and capable national broadband Internet range start at $100 billion, conservatively estimated by the National Research Council. Still, it's not all bad news. Broadband access by businesses is growing quickly: A survey commissioned by the Technology Policy Group and released in September found that 48.3% of U.S. businesses used some broadband service, up 27% from the prior year. Nielsen NetRatings estimated at-work broadband growth in 2001 at 42%, to 25.5 million office workers. The down economy is clearly affecting broadband uptake: cable modem and DSL service run $50 per month, on average, while dial-up is closer to $20, or less. While those who have made the jump to high-speed can't imagine going back, those who have not do not see a compelling reason to do so, at least not yet. Until the price differential shrinks and content improves, the numbers are likely to continue to disappoint observers. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion