Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,735,889 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Borzych v. Frank.


U.S. District Court

EQUAL PROTECTION

ARTICLES

Borzych v. Frank, 340 F.Supp.2d 955 (W.D. Wis adv. 1. Certainly; really; indeed.
v. t. 1. To think; to suppose; to imagine; - used chiefly in the first person sing. present tense, I wis. See the Note under Ywis.
. 2004). A prisoner brought a civil rights action against prison officials. The district court held that the prisoner stated a First Amendment claim with his allegation The assertion, claim, declaration, or statement of a party to an action, setting out what he or she expects to prove.

If the allegations in a plaintiff's complaint are insufficient to establish that the person's legal rights have been violated, the defendant can make a
 that the prison officials denied him a copy of an Odinist text, without which he was unable to practice his religion. But the court found that the prisoner could not maintain a claim based on the allegation that he was not allowed to have a copy of a catalogue in which items related to Wiccanism, Satanism Satanism. The cult of Satan, or Satan worship, is in part a survival of the ancient worship of demons and in part a revolt against Christianity or the church. It rose about the 12th cent.  and Odinism were sold, where the prisoner did not allege To state, recite, assert, or charge the existence of particular facts in a Pleading or an indictment; to make an allegation.


allege v.
 or suggest that he either used or needed a copy of the catalogue in order to practice his Odinist religion. The court held that the prisoner stated an equal protection claim by alleging that, unlike Christian and Muslim inmates, officials discriminated against him by refusing to let him have a copy of the central text of his religion. (Secure Program Facility, Wisconsin Wisconsin, state, United States
Wisconsin (wĭskŏn`sən, –sĭn), upper midwestern state of the United States. It is bounded by Lake Superior and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, from which it is divided by the Menominee
)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:violation of religious rights
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3WI
Date:Feb 1, 2005
Words:172
Previous Article:Benning v. Georgia.(violation of religious rights)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Byar v. Lee.(RELIGION)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. district court: diet exercise privileges religious services visits.(Administrative Segregation)
U.S. district court: visits.(Religion)
Charles v. Verhagen.(freedom of religion)(Brief Article)
Charles v. Verhagen.(muslim inmate sues prison officials )(Brief Article)
Ali v. District of Columbia.(violation of United States Constitution. 11th Amendment)
Madison v. Riter.(FOOD)(Brief Article)
Madison v. Riter.(RELIGION)(Brief Article)
Shakur v. Selsky.(RELIGION)(Brief Article)
Religion.(Fenelon v. Riddle)(Marria v. Broaddus)(Murphy v. Carroll)
Lindell v. Casperson.(RULES & REGULATIONS-PRISONER)(violation of Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles