Board endorses three-year-cycle Appellate Court Rule amendments.Three-year-cycle rule amendments for Appellate Court A court having jurisdiction to review decisions of a trial-level or other lower court. An unsuccessful party in a lawsuit must file an appeal with an appellate court in order to have the decision reviewed. Rules have been endorsed by the Bar Board of Governors and now go to the Supreme Court for its review. Steven Brannock, chair of the Appellate Court Rules Committee, presented the panel's changes at the board's October meeting. Two modifications were editorial or technical, he said, and the other two affected appeals from nonfinal orders and amicus filings at the Supreme Court. The proposed amendment to Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii) would allow appeals from nonfinal orders on writs of replevin A legal action to recover the possession of items of Personal Property. Replevin is one of the oldest Forms of Action known to Common Law, first appearing about the beginning of the thirteenth century. , garnishment garnishment, in law, means of requiring a third party who holds a debt (including wages) due a defendant to retain the property temporarily. The garnishment consists of a warning, in the form of a judgment, to the third party, called the garnishee, not to deliver the , or attachment. The proposed change to Rule 9.370 creates a new subdivision that allows parties to notify the Supreme Court--when the court is considering its discretionary jurisdiction to take a case--that those parties intend to file an amicus brief on the merits on the merits adj. referring to a judgment, decision or ruling of a court based upon the facts presented in evidence and the law applied to that evidence. A judge decides a case "on the merits" when he/she bases the decision on the fundamental issues and considers if the court does take the case. |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion