Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Blumenthal & Markham Announces Court's Ruling in Daniels v. Philip Morris.


Business Editors/Legal Writers

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 16, 2002

Blumenthal & Markham as Class Counsel in Daniels v. Philip Morris, San Diego San Diego (săn dēā`gō), city (1990 pop. 1,110,549), seat of San Diego co., S Calif., on San Diego Bay; inc. 1850. San Diego includes the unincorporated communities of La Jolla and Spring Valley. Coronado is across the bay.  Superior Court, Case No. 719446 (JCCP JCCP Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology
JCCP Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
JCCP Japan Center for Conflict Prevention
JCCP Journal of Clinical Chiropractic Pediatrics
JCCP Jefferson County Community Partnership
 No. 4042) (the "Lawsuit") announces that the Court has granted summary judgment and entered Final Judgment in favor of Defendants and against the Plaintiff Class. Plaintiff Class consists of all persons who as California resident minors (under 18 years of age) smoked one or more cigarettes in California between April 2, 1994 and December 31, 1999 and the parents and/or guardians of such persons under the age of 18. The Defendants in the Lawsuit are Philip Morris, Incorporated, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. Lorillard Tobacco Company “Lorillard” redirects here. For other uses, see Lorillard (disambiguation).
Lorillard Tobacco Company is the 18th oldest company in the United States. They are the third largest American tobacco company and market cigarettes under the brand names Newport (the number
 and Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation. In the Lawsuit, Plaintiffs challenged, amongst other things, the marketing and advertising practices of the Defendants. The Plaintiffs, by and through Class Counsel will be appealing this final judgment. This judgment is binding on the members of the Class and if the judgment is affirmed af·firm  
v. af·firmed, af·firm·ing, af·firms

v.tr.
1. To declare positively or firmly; maintain to be true.

2. To support or uphold the validity of; confirm.

v.intr.
 after appeal, it will constitute a final adjudication The legal process of resolving a dispute. The formal giving or pronouncing of a judgment or decree in a court proceeding; also the judgment or decision given. The entry of a decree by a court in respect to the parties in a case.  of their rights and/or claims in the Lawsuit. No further action of the Class Members is required at this time. If you are interested in viewing a copy of the Court's summary judgment rulings, you may do so at www.sandiego.courts.ca.gov/jccp/tobacco. (Other Orders November 22, 2002). For further information, please visit the website of Class Counsel at www.bamlawca.com or email kyle <noinclude></noinclude>

''This article or section is being rewritten at

One derivation of the surname is from the Scottish Highland word caol, 'channel', or 'strait'. There are other possible derivations (see below).
@bamlawlj.com. Please do not contact the Court or the Clerk's Office by Order of the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Dec 16, 2002
Words:270
Previous Article:Jack in the Box Inc. and Coca-Cola Fountain Sign Five-Year Beverage Agreement.
Next Article:David Pinckard Joins Merant as Vice President of Engineering.



Related Articles
JUDGE THROWS OUT BID TO BLOCK TOBACCO SUIT.
California high court limits immunity for big tobacco.
ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT AGREES TO HEAR PHILIP MORRIS APPEAL.
JUDGE REINSTATES $12 BILLION APPEAL BOND AGAINST PHILIP MORRIS.
FLORIDA COURT DECERTIFIES TOBACCO CLASS ACTION.
Massachusetts high court certifies 'light' cigarette class action.
Oregon Supreme Court upholds punitives against Philip Morris.
Supreme Court to revisit punitive damages.
Supreme Court declines to hear 'light' cigarette case.
Preemption still shielding tobacco companies from liability.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles