Blade Server Acceptance Grows Dramatically, According to Interviews with Fortune 1000 Server Professionals Conducted by TheInfoPro (TIP).NEW YORK New York, state, United States New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of -- TheInfoPro (TIP), www.TheInfoPro.net, has released Wave 3 of its Server Study. According to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. over 130 in-depth interviews with leading Server professionals conducted by TheInfoPro (TIP), Blade Servers are finally gaining acceptance in Enterprise Computing Refers to information technology in the larger company. See enterprise data and enterprise networking. . In Wave 2, 6% had no interest in Blades while another 8% reported that they were skeptical. In Wave 3, these negative responses dropped to zero. Over 85% of users now report that Blade Servers are "valuable" or "critical" to their long-term server plans. The interviews for Wave 2 of the Server Study were conducted in Q4 of 2005, whereas the Wave 3 interviews was conducted in Q2 of 2006. While users continue to be evenly split between "scaling out" (adding processing power through the addition of small units such as Blades) and "scaling up" (adding processing power through virtualizing larger systems), the Blade option is no longer taking a back seat to virtualization An umbrella term for enhancing a computer's ability to do work. Following are the ways virtualization is used. Hardware Virtualization Partitioning the computer's memory into separate and isolated "virtual machines" simulates multiple machines within one physical computer. , and in fact, many users cited plans to virtualize To cause a virtual technique to be performed. See virtualization. on Blades. Balance is shifting slightly back in favor of scaling out as evidence by: --Blade Servers based on Intel processors have risen steadily from 7th in Wave 1 (Summer 2005) to 2nd on the Server Technology Heat Index (TM) in Wave 3 (Summer 2006). This is particularly impressive given the broad penetration of Blade trials in recent years. The Wave 3 Heat Index ranking reflects entirely new projects in companies implementing Blades for the first time. TIP's Technology Heat Index(TM) factors in the current and planned usage of over 30 different Server hardware and software technologies, including Server Virtualization (1) Running applications in separate, isolated partitions within a single server. The "virtual machine" method can run different operating systems simultaneously, whereas the "OS virtualization" method runs applications for only one operating system (see virtual machine and OS , Blade Servers, iSCSI, Server Provisioning and InfiniBand prioritizing them based on the immediacy of planned implementation and near-term spending. Particular weight is given to those technologies with high planned usage but low deployment, which signals significant growth opportunity. To view a preview of the results of the study please visit: http://www.brainshark.com/theinfopro/Servers_W3_WS The Server Study asked many detailed psychographic In the field of marketing, demographics, opinion research, and social research in general, psychographic variables are any attributes relating to personality, values, attitudes, interests, or lifestyles. They are also called IAO variables (for Interests, Attitudes, and Opinions). questions on the "motivators and inhibitors" of Linux, Systems Management, Virtualization and Blade Servers, as well as technology choices and timeframe for deployments. In a detailed examination of Blade Servers, TIP found that: --In Wave 2, 25% of users cited little or no cost benefits as a major inhibitor to Blade deployment; many were citing acquisition cost, and not factoring in lowered operational costs; in Wave 3, this percentage has dropped to under 10%. --Blade users have become more pragmatic, as the benefits users cite have dropped from complex and futuristic such as automated failure to simple space consolidation. --Simplified provisioning rose from 4% of users citing it in Wave 2 to 14% in Wave 3, while the more complex automated failover dropped from 16% to 6% of user mentions. "User opinion of Blade Servers has shifted from disappointment over unfulfilled promises, to acceptance and understanding of just where Blades fit in the enterprise," notes Bob Gill, TIP's Chief Research Officer. "As vendors have toned down the hype over Blades, users are increasingly viewing Blades as simply another form factor with unique advantages and disadvantages, rather than some radically new server type. As one leading edge user describes it, 'After all, for us it's just x86 hardware in a different type of box'. That kind of pragmatic approach is allowing Blades to rise above the hype in users' eyes." Wave 3 of TIP's Server Study captured details on a broad range of user experiences and plans for grid computing, virtualization, blade servers, server networking, server and systems management, storage options, and processor types. Technology providers discussed and rated by users include IBM (International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, NY, www.ibm.com) The world's largest computer company. IBM's product lines include the S/390 mainframes (zSeries), AS/400 midrange business systems (iSeries), RS/6000 workstations and servers (pSeries), Intel-based servers (xSeries) , HP, Dell, Sun, AMD (Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, www.amd.com) A major manufacturer of semiconductor devices including x86-compatible CPUs, embedded processors, flash memories, programmable logic devices and networking chips. , Intel, Egenera, Fabric7, Brocade, McDATA, QLogic, NetApp, Broadcom, EMC/VMware, Microsoft, Red Hat, Suse/Novell, Altiris, Opsware, Rackable, Symantec, Oracle, BMC (BMC Software, Inc., Houston, TX, www.bmc.com) A leading supplier of software that supports and improves the availability, performance, and recovery of applications in complex computing environments. , Cisco, PolyServe, PlateSpin and Azul. To view a preview of the results of the study please visit: http://www.brainshark.com/theinfopro/Servers_W3_WS TheInfoPro (TIP) is a NYC NYC abbr. New York City NYC New York City based research network for the Information Technology (IT) industry. Known as the "voice of the customer" TIP produces fundamental, grass roots research on the Storage, Servers, Information Security and Networking sectors delivered without any analyst spin or bias. The research source is the world's largest buyers and users of IT, a peer-sharing network of over 900 companies including Citigroup, FedEx, McGraw-Hill, MasterCard, Pfizer, Vodafone, PepsiCo, JPMorgan Chase and Harvard University. Founded in 2002 by alumni of Gartner, EMC (1) (EMC Corporation, Hopkinton, MA, www.emc.com) The leading supplier of storage products for midrange computers and mainframes. Founded in 1979 by Richard J. Egan and Roger Marino, EMC has developed advanced storage and retrieval technologies for the world's largest companies. , Giga and Bell Labs TIP serves three primary constituencies: IT Professionals, Institutional Investors and Technology Providers. |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion