Bladder cancers: one in four due to jobs.Bladder cancers bladder cancer Malignant tumour of the bladder. The most significant risk factor associated with bladder cancer is smoking. Exposure to chemicals called arylamines, which are used in the leather, rubber, printing, and textiles industries, is another risk factor. : One in four due to jobs Male boothblacks, salespeople sales·peo·ple pl.n. Persons who are employed to sell merchandise in a store or in a designated territory. , broadcasters, gardeners, and produce graders or packers are among a host of workers running an increased, previously unrecognized risk of bladder cancer, according to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. a pair of government studies. Past studies have shown that smoking may account for half of male bladder cancers. Jobs now appear responsible for half the rest, the new studies reveal. Striking roughly four times as many men as women in the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. , carcinoma of the urinary bladder urinary bladder n. A musculomembranous elastic receptacle in the anterior part of the pelvic cavity serving as the temporary storage place for urine. is the fifth most common cancer in men. Epidemiologists with the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Md., and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research This article is about the U.S. Army medical research institute (not the hospital). Otherwise, see Walter Reed (disambiguation). The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) is the largest biomedical research facility administered by the U.S. in Washington, D.C., polled 2,100 white and 126 nonwhile men with bladder cancer -- from 10 geographically diverse areas -- for data on every job they had held for six months or longer since age 12. The researchers compared these data with those collected from almost twice as many randomly selected men of the same races and about the same ages. At least some of the observed associations between jobs and cancer are "virtually certain" to have resulted from chance, Debra T. Silverman and her coauthors note in the Oct. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE. For example, they say, though male clerical work has been linked with risk of the cancer in two other studies -- and here in a threefold excess after 10 years of employment -- scientists have "no credible biologic explanation" for such a link. However, weighing the magnitude of apparent risk along with its statistical significance and several other factors, the researchers now conclude that "the strongest evidence of increased risk" in white men shows up in painters (exposed to many known and potential carcinogens Carcinogens Substances in the environment that cause cancer, presumably by inducing mutations, with prolonged exposure. Mentioned in: Colon Cancer, Rectal Cancer ), truck drivers (exposed to carcinogens in vehicular exhaust) and drill press operators (exposed to potentially toxic cutting- and lubricating-oil mists.) Painters, for example, initially face a risk 50 percent greater than that of men who have never painted, according to the new results. And painters employed 10 years or more run a risk 300 percent higher than nonpainters. Ironically, the scientists say, though nine other studies have suggested a similar association, the risk of bladder cancer among painters "has received little attention." Risks that stand out among nonwhites, whom the researchers studied separately, include employment at any time within the auto industry or as dry cleaners or clothes pressers. However, the researchers note, the overall "risk of occupational bladder cancer among white and nonwhite non·white n. A person who is not white. non white adj. men is similar."
|
|
||||||||||||||||

white
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion