Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Biovail Comments on Recent Court Proceedings.


TORONTO--(BW HealthWire)--April 7, 1998--

Recent Ruling Dissimilar from Company's Factual Circumstances in

Critical Aspects

Company Confirms it has Intervened in Relevant Related Litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
 

Biovail Corporation International (NYSE NYSE

See: New York Stock Exchange
:BVF BVF Biovail Corporation (stock symbol)
BVF Berufsverband der Frauenärzte eV (Muenchen, Germany)
BVF Bearing Versus Frequency
) (TSE See Tokyo Stock Exchange.

TSE

1. See Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE).

2. See Toronto Stock Exchange (TSE).
:BVF) yesterday commented on two court proceedings dealing with issues concerning the exclusivity provisions of the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act

a regulation in the United States which requires all drugs used in animals to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
 ("FD&C") relating to generic products. The two relevant court proceedings are Granutec vs. Genpharm et. al. and Mova vs. FDA FDA
abbr.
Food and Drug Administration


FDA,
n.pr See Food and Drug Administration.

FDA,
n.pr the abbreviation for the Food and Drug Administration.
 et. al.

Biovail confirmed that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal's decision released today in Granutec overturned the decision of the District Court which had upheld FDA's "successful defense" interpretation of the exclusivity provision of the FD&C Act. The Company confirmed its position that the facts applicable to the parties in the Granutec case are dissimilar from Biovail's factual circumstances in a number of critical and key aspects as they relate to Biovail's version of its generic Cardizem CD. As a result, the Company commented that the decision does not squarely rule on the applicability of the exclusivity provisions relating to its filed generic Cardizem CD.

Biovail also confirmed today that on March 20, 1998, in a related Court Case it became an Intervenor amicus curiae in Mova v. FDA et. al. at the District of Columbia District of Columbia, federal district (2000 pop. 572,059, a 5.7% decrease in population since the 1990 census), 69 sq mi (179 sq km), on the east bank of the Potomac River, coextensive with the city of Washington, D.C. (the capital of the United States).  Court of Appeal level. The Court of Appeal in Mova has accepted for filing Biovail's submission, as it specifically relates to the filing of its generic version of Cardizem CD, is considering Biovail's position, and is expected ultimately to rule on Biovail's specific circumstances in the context of determining all the issues in that Appeal. The most crucial and differentiating fact is that, unlike other ANDA ANDA
abbr.
abbreviated new drug application
 submissions, Biovail was not sued for patent infringement.

Biovail reaffirmed its position that any interpretation that does not take into account the built-in abuses and unfairness to legitimate ANDA non-infringing filers when determining the applicability or otherwise of the 180-day exclusivity set forth in the FD&C Act is inappropriate and will be litigated vigorously by the Company.

Biovail Corporation International is an international full-service pharmaceutical company, engaged in the formulation, clinical testing, registration and manufacture of drug products utilizing advanced drug delivery technologies.

"Safe Harbor" statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) implemented several significant substantive changes affecting certain cases brought under the federal securities laws, including changes related to pleading, discovery, liability, class representation and awards fees and  of 1995.

To the extent any statements made in this release contain information that is not historical, these statements are essentially forward looking and are subject to risks and uncertainties, including the difficulty of predicting FDA and TPD approvals, acceptance and demand for new pharmaceutical products, the impact of competitive products and pricing, new product development and launch, reliance on key strategic alliances, availability of raw materials, the regulatory environment, fluctuations in operating results and other risks detailed from time to time in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

CONTACT: Biovail Corporation International

Eugene Melnyk or Kenneth C. Cancellara, Q.C

416/285-6000
COPYRIGHT 1998 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Apr 7, 1998
Words:477
Previous Article:Venus Reports 1997 Results.
Next Article:Ernst & Young Tops National Accounting Firms In Growth.
Topics:



Related Articles
Biovail licensee files summary judgement dismissal against Marion Merrell Dow in patent litigation.
Biovail Confirms Docket Posting of New Tiazac Patent in Orange Book.
FDA APPROVES BIOVAIL'S GENERIC PROCARDIA XL 30MG DOSAGE.
Andrx Announces Court Ruling in Its Favor; Authorizes Earlier FDA Approval of Andrx's Generic Tiazac.
Biovail Updates Status of NDA for Tramadol ER.
Court Rules in Favor of Biovail in Tiazac Class Actions.
Biovail Updates Status of Previously Disclosed OSC Investigation.
Biovail to Present Case Study on Corporate Governance.
Biovail Acknowledges Chairman Receives Notice of Hearing from the OSC.
Biovail Comments on Wellbutrin XL(R) Court Ruling.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles