Bill would phase out dry cleaning solvent statewide. (Up Front).Just three months after Southern California's smog agency adopted landmark regulations phasing out use of its most commonly used dry cleaning dry cleaning, process of cleaning fabrics without water. Special solvents and soaps are used so as not to harm fabrics and dyes that will not withstand the effects of ordinary soap and water. Dry cleaning began in France about the middle of the 19th cent. solvent, there's a bill in the Legislature that would speed up the ban and make it statewide. The legislation by Assemblyman Paul Koretz Paul Koretz (D-Los Angeles) announced his plans on August 2, 2007[1] to seek the Los Angeles 5th District City Council seat now occupied by Jack Weiss in 2009. Weiss is expected to run for Los Angels City Attorney against the current City Attorney, Rock Delgadio. , D-West Hollywood, would require dry cleaners throughout California to stop using the toxic solvent perchloroethylene--commonly known as perc--by 2014. The bill also would slap a $3 per gallon fee on the purchase of the solvent to create a fund that would assist dry cleaners in the switch to non-toxic alternatives, such as hydrocarbon-based or silicone-based solvents. "This is an environmental hazard 'Environmental hazard' is a generic term for any situation or state of events which poses a threat to the surrounding environment. This term incorporates topics like pollution and Natural Hazards such as storms and earthquakes. ," said Koretz. "This is an issue that needs to be addressed." Against fierce opposition by the dry cleaning industry, the South Coast Air Quality Management District The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), formed in 1976, is the air pollution agency responsible mainly for regulating stationary sources of air pollution for most of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside County, and all of Orange county. adopted the nation's first ban on the use of perc in December. The regulation phases out perc only within the district's borders, which covers Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. and three other counties, by 2020. Koretz said the regional ban didn't go far enough because perc is so toxic. Perchlorethylene does not cause smog, but it is suspected of causing cancer in humans. Opponents in the dry cleaning industry say nothing works as well or as cheaply as perc. Paul Choe, vice president of the Korean Dry Cleaners Association of Southern California Southern California, also colloquially known as SoCal, is the southern portion of the U.S. state of California. Centered on the cities of Los Angeles and San Diego, Southern California is home to nearly 24 million people and is the nation's second most populated region, , which spearheaded opposition to the district's ban, was critical of the new effort, singling out the statewide fee in particular. Choe estimated that a small operation might use 100 gallons of perc per year, with the $300 annual cost for the fee another expense for cleaners already hit by big increases in workers' compensation workers' compensation, payment by employers for some part of the cost of injuries, or in some cases of occupational diseases, received by employees in the course of their work. and business insurance costs. "Most dry cleaners are mom and pop Mom and Pop An adjective denoting a small-scale and family-like atmosphere, often used to describe these types of businesses and investors. Notes: A mom-and-pop business is typically a small family-run business. operations," he said. "We are supposed to increase our prices (to make up for our costs), but with all the competition we cannot raise the price to what it is supposed to be." There is a second bill in the Legislature by Assemblyman Alan Lowenthal, D-Long Beach, which would set the same $3 per gallon fee on perc statewide but not affect the ban. The Air Quality Management District estimates that 1.10 cleaners out of 2,100 in Southern California have switched to safer alternatives, which it insists are as effective as perc and just as cheap to use. However, the alternatives require cleaners to purchase new machines, which can cost $42,000--about $10,000 more than perc machines. The proposed statewide fund would subsidize cleaners' purchase of the new machines. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion