Bill on arbitration contradicts ruling by appeals court. (Law).If Gov. Gray Davis signs a bill now on his desk, it could send California employment law into a state of confusion. Senate Bill 1538, passed by the state Assembly Aug. 24 and concurred by the state Senate on Aug. 30, is at odds with a decision handed down earlier this month by a three-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. . The panel ruled on Sept. 3 that businesses can require employees to sign agreements to arbitrate discrimination claims, in direct opposition to the bill, which says employers cannot force employees to sign arbitration arbitration Process of resolving a dispute or a grievance outside a court system by presenting it for decision to an impartial third party. Both sides in the dispute usually must agree in advance to the choice of arbitrator and certify that they will abide by the agreements for discrimination disputes. "Everybody's kind of confused," said Allison Michael, an employment attorney at Jones Day Reavis & Pogue in L.A. "If the decision remains, and the bill isn't signed, you'll see employers more willing to put arbitration agreements in place. At this time, the way businesses are folding and merging, having an arbitration as a workable alternative dispute resolution Procedures for settling disputes by means other than litigation; e.g., by Arbitration, mediation, or minitrials. Such procedures, which are usually less costly and more expeditious than litigation, are increasingly being used in commercial and labor disputes, Divorce is a huge goal for businesses." Davis, who has until the end of the month to sign the bill into law or veto veto [Lat.,=I forbid], power of one functionary (e.g., the president) of a government, or of one member of a group or coalition, to block the operation of laws or agreements passed or entered into by the other functionaries or members. In the U.S. it, has not taken a position on the legislation, said Russ Lopez, spokesman for the Governor's office. The court's ruling came in the case of a legal secretary fired by San Diego San Diego (săn dēā`gō), city (1990 pop. 1,110,549), seat of San Diego co., S Calif., on San Diego Bay; inc. 1850. San Diego includes the unincorporated communities of La Jolla and Spring Valley. Coronado is across the bay. law firm Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol after declining to sign an agreement to arbitrate discrimination claims. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a suit on his behalf in Los Angeles County Superior Court in 1998. A trial court ruled in favor of upon the side of; favorable to; for the advantage of. See also: favor the secretary, but the Court of Appeals backed the firm, stating "employers may require employees to sign agreements to arbitrate... claims as a condition of their employment." Anna Park, regional attorney at the EEOC's L.A. district office, said the agency is considering whether to ask the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to re-hear the case. Staff reporter Amanda Bronstad can be reached at (323) 549-5225 ext. 225, or at abronstad@labusinessjournal.com. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion