Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,735,185 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Big worries about little tubes.


Carbon nanotubes See nanotube.  could carry the same dangers to human lungs that asbestos does, says an Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), independent agency of the U.S. government, with headquarters in Washington, D.C. It was established in 1970 to reduce and control air and water pollution, noise pollution, and radiation and to ensure the safe handling and  researcher. Philip M. Cook of the EPA's Duluth, Minn., research laboratory and other scientists had previously linked the toxic potential of various needlelike fibers to their length, width, and shape. Fibers that damage lungs tend to fall into a size range comparable to some carbon nanotubes, an emerging family of synthetic fibers with a variety of potential industrial applications.

Cook and his colleagues have shown that short, thin mineral fibers are retained longer in the lungs than larger fibers are and that the short fibers can trigger cancer. Some commercially produced carbon nanotubes are 0.1 micrometer micrometer (mīkrŏm`ətər, mī`krōmē'tər).

1 Instrument used for measuring extremely small distances.
 wide and 5 to 20 [micro]m long, just about "the asbestos-fiber size that everyone believes is toxic", notes Cook.

In some industrial applications, carbon nanotubes are being commingled with zeolites, which are natural and synthetic silica-based minerals. Cook's research has shown that at least one type of zeolite zeolite

Any member of a family of hydrated aluminosilicate minerals that have a framework structure enclosing interconnected cavities occupied by large metal cations (positively charged ions)—generally sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, and barium—and water
 fiber is even more toxic to the lungs than is asbestos. A separate study last year found that the zeolite fibers' size and the minerals' chemistry contributed independently to toxicity, providing a double whammy double whammy
Noun

informal a devastating setback made up of two elements

double whammy n (col) → palo doble

double whammy n (inf
.

Cook recommends caution. Until research demonstrates that nanotubes aren't toxic to people, he says, manufacturers shouldn't be commercializing them in sizes that can be readily inhaled in·hale  
v. in·haled, in·hal·ing, in·hales

v.tr.
1. To draw (air or smoke, for example) into the lungs by breathing; inspire.

2.
.--J.R.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Toxicology
Publication:Science News
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Aug 30, 2003
Words:226
Previous Article:Meditation changes.(Behavior)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Testing computers' hazardous potential.(Chemistry)
Topics:



Related Articles
Insect mine lake contaminants. (can transform pollutants back into sediment through food chain) (Brief Article)
AT PLAY IN THE SNOW BIG BEAR HAS MULTIPLE OPTIONS FOR FAMILY FROLIC BEYOND THE SKI SLOPES.(Travel)
Occupational exposure to urban pollutants and urinary 5-hydroxy-3-indoleacetic acid.(Library Corner)
Library Corner.
Too much of a good thing (fish): methylmercury case study.(Library Corner)(Book Review)
Medical examiner retirement puts county in a bind.(General News)(Until someone else is hired, suspicious cases are being sent to Portland for autopsy)
Watch out, worms!(The Beat)
Medical webwatch.(Special Section)
Unplanned releases and injuries associated with aerial application of chemicals, 1995-2002.(Library Corner)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles