Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Bid Protest Ruling: Department of the Navy--Request for Modification of Remedy.


B-401102.3 August 6, 2009

The Naval Facilities Engineering The term "facilities engineering" evolved from "plant engineering" in the early 1990s as U.S. workplaces became more complex. Practitioners preferred this term because it more accurately reflected the multidisciplinary demands for specialized conditions in a wider variety of indoor  Command requests that our Office modify the recommendation in our decision Rosemary Livingston--Agency Tender Official, B-401102.2, July 6, 2009, 2009 CPD CPD citrate phosphate dextrose; see anticoagulant citrate phosphate dextrose solution, under solution.
Cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) 
 para. __, in which we sustained the agency tender official's (ATO ATO Australian Taxation Office
ATO Ambito Territoriale Ottimale (Italy)
ATO Alpha Tau Omega
ATO Air Traffic Organization (FAA)
ATO Arab Towns Organization
ATO Air Tasking Order
ATO Assemble To Order
) protest, concluding that there was inadequate documentation to support a finding that the ATO's fourth revised tender was unacceptable and further discussions were necessary. In issuing our recommendation, we stated that ordinarily we would have recommended that the agency re-evaluate proposals, document those conclusions, and then take appropriate action based on those conclusions. However, because the implementation of such a recommendation is barred by 8023 of the Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009, we recommended that the agency terminate the contract award. The Navy contends that we should have left to the agency's discretion whether corrective action is unlawful under the circumstances of this case.

We deny the request.

Categories: Bid Protest, Agency evaluation, Competition, Contract termination, Documentation, Military appropriations, Modifications, Protests, Technical proposal evaluation
COPYRIGHT 2009 Stonehenge International
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:General Accounting Office Reports & Testimony
Date:Sep 1, 2009
Words:169
Previous Article:Bid Protest Ruling: Argon ST, Inc.
Next Article:Small Business Innovation Research: Observations on Agencies' Data Collection and Eligibility Determination Efforts.



Related Articles
Sodexho Management, Inc.--Costs.
Planning Systems, Inc.
Reedsport Machine & Fabrication.
Saltwater Inc.
Bid Protest Ruling: Raydar & Associates, Inc.
Bid Protest Ruling: Outdoor Venture Corporation.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles