Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Benefits of competition.


* In the article "Why Compete?"(June June: see month.  2009, p. 16) about the Air Force refueling tanker program, the following statement is made: "The benefits of competition are well established: innovation, efficiency, effectiveness, quality and performance. Although competition is frequently implemented in Defense Department programs, its practice is not being maximized."

The U.S. Navy's Littoral Combat Ship The Littoral Combat Ship is the first of the U.S. Navy's next-generation surface combatants. Intended as a relatively small surface vessel for operations in the littoral region (close to shore), the LCS is smaller than the Navy's guided missile frigates, and have been compared to  program is an example of where two independent shipbuilders are competing with each other with different ship designs for the same program. The competing contractors (Lockheed Martin For the former company, see .

Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) is a leading multinational aerospace manufacturer and advanced technology company formed in 1995 by the merger of Lockheed Corporation with Martin Marietta.
 and General Dynamics General Dynamics Corporation (NYSE: GD) is a defense conglomerate formed by mergers and divestitures, and as of 2006 it is the sixth largest defense contractor in the world[1]. The company has changed markedly in the post-Cold War era of defense consolidation. ) stated an estimated unit price for each ship at $220 million. The cost is now in the range of $700 million per ship. The congressional cost cap is $460 million per ship. Therefore, the Navy may not reach its required acquisition goal of 55 littoral combat ships if the price is not lowered. The above attributes of innovation, efficiency, effectiveness, quality, and performance appear not to have manifested themselves up to this point.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Although there is competition, the taxpayers have not realized a monetary savings.

The Air Force may have concluded that it is prudent to go with the winner-take-all scenario in the tanker competition between Boeing and Northrop Grumman Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE: NOC) is an aerospace and defense conglomerate that is the result of the 1994 purchase of Grumman by Northrop. The company is the third largest defense contractor for the U.S. . In this uncertain budgetary climate, the Air Force believes the argument that two, solesource, "split buy" awards would not achieve the incentives of competition.

Steven Silverman Steven (Steve) A. Silverman is a politician and an at-large County Councilmember in Montgomery County, Maryland. Currently he is in his second, four year term. He chairs the Council's Planning, Housing, and Economic Development Committee and has twice been chosen by his peers to  

Philadelphia, PA
COPYRIGHT 2009 National Defense Industrial Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:READER'S FORUM: VIEWS ... COMMENTS ... SUGGESTIONS
Comment:Benefits of competition.(READER'S FORUM: VIEWS ... COMMENTS ... SUGGESTIONS)
Author:Silverman, Steven
Publication:National Defense
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:Aug 1, 2009
Words:226
Previous Article:Acquisition work force reform will require steady commitment.
Next Article:True cause of cost overruns.
Topics:



Related Articles
Log notes.
Genuine letters help democratize our debate: letters give a window into how regular folks see the events of the day.
New research on the nature of letters and their writers.
Write to us and win a digital radio; In association with POST OFFICE THE ARROW ALL ROCK RADIO.
A Beginner's Guide to Internet Marketing
Email anxiety, the search for a cure
Conservative Forum
Conservative Forum
Conservative Forum III
Conservative Forum

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles