Benefit of Betaseron confirmed.The July 1995 issue of Neurology neurology (n rŏl`əjē, ny –), study of the morphology, physiology, and pathology of the human nervous system. published additional data on the
experience of people taking high-dose Betaseron Betaseron® Recombinant IFN-β1b, see there in the large clinical
trial that led to its FDA FDAabbr. Food and Drug Administration FDA, n.pr See Food and Drug Administration. FDA, n.pr the abbreviation for the Food and Drug Administration. approval. The data confirm the effect of treatment and show that the benefit continues. Data now cover a four- to five-year period in which people on the drug averaged a 30% reduction in the number of MS relapses, as compared to people who took the placebo placebo (pləsē`bō), inert substance given instead of a potent drug. Placebo medications are sometimes prescribed when a drug is not really needed or when one would not be appropriate because they make patients feel well taken care of. (an inert inert /in·ert/ (in-ert´) inactive. in·ert adj. 1. Sluggish in action or motion; lethargic. 2. look-alike). Increased benefit for many people A close look at the data shows that the benefit to the majority was a 50% reduction in relapse rate. Moreover, this group - which made up 62% of those taking what is now the standard dose - showed no increase in MS lesions (or damaged areas in the brain) as seen by annual MRI 1. (application) MRI - Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2. MRI - Measurement Requirements and Interface. exams. People on the placebo had more relapses and significantly more and larger lesions. Some questions for others After 18 months of treatment, 38% of people taking high-dose Betaseron developed neutralizing antibodies neu·tral·iz·ing antibody n. An antibody that reacts with an infectious agent, usually a virus, and destroys or inhibits its infectiveness and virulence. to the drug. Their outcomes were about the same as outcomes in the group that took inert placebo injections. Much remains unknown about these antibodies - and the definitive meaning of the study data is unclear. The method used to determine the presence of neutralizing antibodies is controversial. The lab test used in the clinical trial is not considered foolproof or easy to do. A better test is under development, but it is not yet available. Because Betaseron is a protein - not a conventional chemical agent - the development of antibodies was not a surprise to some experts. Something similar might be expected in any therapy based on proteins not normally found in the body. It is clear that people who remain antibody-free do very well on Betaseron - far better than the overall trial results initially indicated. Thus, Betaseron therapy should be discussed by physicians and their patients one to one. |
|
||||||||||||||||

rŏl`əjē, ny
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion