Battling terrorism; legal perspectives on the use of force and the war on terror.0754644073 Battling terrorism; legal perspectives on the use of force and the war on terror This article is about U.S. actions, and those of other states, after September 11, 2001. For other conflicts, see Terrorism. The War on Terror (also known as the War on Terrorism . Maogoto, Jackson Nyamuya. Ashgate Publishing Co. 2005 209 pages $99.95 Hardcover KZ6374 In exploring the international legal implications of the use of military force as a counter to terrorism, Maogoto (U. of Newcastle, Australia) bases his discussion on the central theme that the right to self-defense in the midst Adv. 1. in the midst - the middle or central part or point; "in the midst of the forest"; "could he walk out in the midst of his piece?" midmost of a process of change. His evaluation is based within the context of the uncertainty and indeterminacy of state practice and the legal framework on the use of force articulated in the United Nations Charter. After laying out the general contours of the international regime on the use of force, the definition of terrorism Few words are as politically or emotionally charged as terrorism. A 1988 study by the US Army[1] counted 109 definitions of terrorism that covered a total of 22 different definitional elements. , and state responses to terrorism Responses to terrorism are broad in scope. They can include re-alignments of the political spectrum and reassessments of fundamental values. The term counter-terrorism has a narrower connotation, implying that it is directed at terrorist actors. , he explores the notion of anticipatory self-defense found in the so-called Bush Doctrine and the US invasions of Afghanistan Afghanistan has been invaded many times, its boundaries and legitimate government have almost always been in dispute. Invaders include: the Mughal rulers of South Asia, Russian Tsars, Soviet Union, British Empire, and currently a coalition force of NATO troops with UN-backing led by US and Iraq. He also examines definitions of state-sponsored terrorism as related to tenets of state responsibility and enshrined norms on the use of force in the UN Charter. Maogoto concludes with an argument for maintaining the centrality of the UN in confronting the threat of terrorism. ([c]20062005 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR) |
|
||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion