Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Barclays fined pounds 2.45m for abuse of new rules.


Byline: Iain Laing

BARCLAYS has been fined pounds 2.45m by the City watchdog for serious weaknesses in transaction reporting at its investment banking arm.

The fine announced yesterday marks the eighth largest ever imposed by the Financial Services Authority The Financial Services Authority ("FSA") is an independent non-departmental public body and quasi-judicial body that regulates the financial services industry in the United Kingdom. Its main office is based in Canary Wharf, London, with another office in Edinburgh.  (FSA FSA Financial Services Authority
FSA Food Standards Agency (UK)
FSA Farm Service Agency (USDA)
FSA Financial Services Agency (Japan) 
).

The FSA said systems and controls failures came to light while it was investigating suspected market abuse by a third party.

Barclays escaped an even bigger fine of pounds 3.5m after the FSA offered a 30% discount following co-operation from the banking giant.

The FSA uncovered failures by Barclays to provide accurate transaction details as required by the close of business each day - information used by the regulator regulator,
n the mechanical part of a gas delivery system that controls gas pressure that allows a manageable flow of drug vapor to escape.


regulator

see reducing valve.
 to detect and investigate suspected market abuse.

Barclays did not have the adequate systems and controls in place to meet stringent new reporting rules, while the FSA also discovered errors in the data submitted.

The breaches took place throughout 2007 and 2008, "despite repeated reminders to firms of their obligations to provis de accurate data", according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the FSA.

Alexander Justham, director of markets for the FSA, said: "Complete and accurate transaction reports are an essential component of the FSA's market monitoring work. Barclays' reporting failures could have a damaging impact on our ability to detect and investigate suspected market abuse.

"The penalty imposed on Barclays is significantly higher than previous penalties imposed for transaction reporting errors. This reflects the serious nature of Barclays' breaches and is a warning to other firms that the FSA will not tolerate inadequate systems and controls."

The FSA found failures surrounding 57.5 million transactions by Barclays, with errors in nearly 100% of its reportable transactions.

Barclays blamed inaccuracies in its IT systems and has since committed "extensive" investment to improve and resolve transaction reporting operations.

A spokesman for the bank said: "We have worked constructively and in full co-operation with the FSA throughout the investigation.

"The regulatory reporting errors were caused by inaccuracies in our data feeds to the FSA. No counterparties Counterparties

The parties on either side of an interest rate swap or a currency, equity or commodity swap, or to an options or futures position.
, clients, or financial reports were affected in any way."

CAPTION(S):

TROUBLE Barclays has failed to meet stringent new reporting rules.
COPYRIGHT 2009 MGN Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:The Journal (Newcastle, England)
Date:Sep 9, 2009
Words:350
Previous Article:Schemes help with training; ADVERTISEMENT FEATURE.
Next Article:Pub operator sounds note of pessimism.



Related Articles
Wooing process.
BONUS 'SHAME' OF GREEDY BANK CHIEFS; Fury at the latest big payouts.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles