Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,546,674 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Bane v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections.


U.S. District Court

EXCESSIVE FORCE

RESTRAINTS

Bane v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections, 267 F.Supp.2d 514 (W.D.Va. 2003). An inmate brought action against a state corrections department and prison officials, stemming from injuries allegedly suffered while being handcuffed. The district court denied motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. The court found that the inmate properly stated a prima facie prima facie (pry-mah fay-shah) adj. Latin for "at first look," or "on its face," referring to a lawsuit or criminal prosecution in which the evidence before trial is sufficient to prove the case unless there is substantial contradictory evidence presented at trial. A prima facie case presented to a grand jury by the prosecution will result in an indictment. claim under the Rehabilitation Act by alleging that he suffered from a chronically unstable right shoulder and that he had been issued a "cuff-front" pass by the corrections department medical personnel. The pass required prison personnel to cuff the inmate with his hands in front to accommodate his injury, but prison officers failed to heed the cuff pass and handcuffed the inmate's arms behind his back. The court noted that acceptance of federal funds by the state corrections department was a waiver of its sovereign immunity from liability under the federal Rehabilitation Act. The court ordered further proceedings to determine if officers destroyed a posted medical order pertaining to the inmate, whether another officer stood by as an officer handcuffed the inmate in a manner contrary to the posted medical order, and whether the officers maliciously intended to cause harm to the inmate. (Wallens Ridge State Prison, Virginia)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:violation of Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U5VA
Date:Aug 1, 2003
Words:212
Previous Article:Sulton v. Wright.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Marquez v. Gutierrez.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. appeals court: free speech.(Civil Rights)
U.S. appeals court: prohibition regulation.(Mail)(Brief Article)
U.S. appeals court: mail; Clement v. California Dept. of Corrections.(Rules & Regulations-Prisoner)
Ali v. District of Columbia.(violation of United States Constitution. 11th Amendment)
Ferrington v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections.(exhaustion of state remedies)(Brief Article)
Kiman v. New Hampshire Dept. of Corrections.(EX-OFFENDERS)(Brief Article)
Hock v. Thipedeau.(GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES, PRISONER)(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Cline v. Fox.(violation of United States Constitution. 14th Amendment and United States Constitution. 1st Amendment)(Brief Article)
Bane v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections.(violation of Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998)(Brief Article)
Fitzgerald v. Corrections Corp. of America.(Fitzgerald v. Corrections Corp. of America, 403 F.3d 1134, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles