Bacterial inoculant effects on corn silage fermentation and nutrient composition.INTRODUCTION
The main aim of silage making is to conserve the plants with minimal loss of nutritive value by fermentation of soluble carbohydrates in an anaerobic environment into organic acids, preferably lactic acid, which reduce pH (Saarisalo et al., 2007). The fermentation quality of silages has a major effect on feed intake, nutrient utilization and milk production of ruminants (Huhtanen et al., 2002, 2003). Fresh whole corn (Zea mays, L.) dry matter (DM) which generally contains 30-40% grains is rich in linoleic acid (LA, [C.sub.18:2], 55-62%) and oleic acid ([C.sub.18:1], 24-32%) and poor in [alpha]-linolenic acid (ALA, [C.sub.18:3], <2%; Chilliard et al., 2007). Concentrations of ALA vary with plant and environmental factors such as stage of maturity, genetic differences, as well as season and light intensity (Elgersma et al., 2006). When forages are conserved as silage, they maintain the same concentration of long chain-FA as when harvested fresh (Chilliard et al., 2001). Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are often used as silage additives to enhance lactic acid fermentation, hence to better preserve the ensiled material. Bacterial inoculants have advantages over chemical additives because they are easy to use, safe, do not pollute the environment and are regarded as natural products. Most commercially available inoculants contain homofermentative LABs, which improve the silage fermentation. Among the homofermentative LAB most frequently used are Lactobacillus plantarum, L. acidophilus, Enterococcus faecium and Pediococcus acidilactici. Numerous papers have reported the ensiling of corn without inoculants (Abdehadia et al., 2005; Kozakai et al., 2007), with the inoculants Lactobacillus plantarum (Filya, 2003), Lactobacillus buchneri, and Propionibacterium acidipropionici (Filya and Sucu, 2007), commercial inoculants containing lactobacilli, enterococci, pediococci (Weinberg et al., 2004) and with mixtures of inoculants, such as L. plantarum+L. buchneri (Filya, 2003), L. plantarum+Enterococcus faecium; and L. plantarum+ Pediococcus acidilactici (Sucu and Filya, 2006; Koc et al., 2008). Some in vitro experiments showed that certain microorganisms e.g., lactobacilli, lactococci, propionibacteriae, bifidobacteriae and enterococci are able to form conjugated linoleic acid (CLA, cis 9, trans 11 [C.sub.18:2]) from linoleic acid in special growth medium (Coakley et al., 2003; Sieber et al., 2004). However, Bessa et al. (2000) revealed the possibility of an alternative pathway in the production of CLA from linolenic acid ([C.sub.18:3]) due to extreme microbial diversity in the reticulo-rumen. Also, our screening of microorganisms showed that some lactobacilli and enterococci isolated from rumen fluid and silages were able to convert linoleic acid (LA) to CLA in special growth medium in vitro (Marcinakova, 2006). The objective of this study was to evaluate the survival and effect of three new probiotic inoculants (isolates of our Institute and L. plantarum CCM 4000 which was kindly supplied by Dr. Nemcova, University of Veterinary Medicine, Kosice, Slovakia) on corn silage fermentation and chemical composition (including mainly polyunsaturated fatty acids, PUFA).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Treatments, material and ensiling
The silages were made from fresh cut corn plants (Zea mays, L.) wilted for 16h. Whole plants were chopped to a length of 20 mm with a forage chopper and pressed into 1 L sealed polyethylene jars and 0.7 L glass jars equipped with a lid that enabled gas release only. The corn dry matter (DM) was 288.3 g/kg DM and it contained crude protein at 57.2, and NDF at 513.3 g/kg DM (Table 1). The ensiling of corn was carried out in 40 jars that were divided into four groups. Four treatments (each with 10 jars) were used: i) the untreated corn (control) without inoculant (CS); ii) corn inoculated by the strain Enterococcus faecium CCM 4231 (CS+EF); iii) corn inoculated by the strain Lactobacillus fermentum LF2 (CS+LF); iv) corn inoculated by the strain Lactobacillus plantarum CCM 4000 (CS+LP), respectively. For the ensiling experiments a fresh culture of each inoculant was prepared in Ringer solution to a concentration of [10.sup.9] cfu/ml. Then the cultures were applied at 10 ml per kg of fresh corn. The ensiling of corn was carried out at 21[degrees]C for 105 days. Representative samples of the raw material (untreated chopped corn) were taken for microbiological and chemical analyses before division into jars. In addition, two jars per treatment were opened on days 7, 21, 40 and four jars per treatment were opened on day 105 of ensiling for microbiological and chemical analyses.
Characterization of the silage inoculants and microbial analysis
Enterococcus faecium CCM 4231 (Laukova et al., 1993) is the first described bacteriocin-producing isolate of rumen origin possessing probiotic properties and which is able to transform linoleic acid into CLA (Marcinakova, 2006). Lactobacillus plantarum CCM 4000, is a ruminal isolate (Nemcova, 1989) and L. fermentum LF2 is isolated from a commercial canine feed mixture Propesko, Marcirakova, 2006). To enumerate the counts of inoculants as well as the other enterococci and lactic acid bacteria, 10 g of silage was sampled and mixed with 90 ml of Ringer solution (pH 7.0, Basingstoke, England); 100 aliquots of serial dilutions were plated onto M-Enterococcus agar (in duplicate) to enumerate enterococci, and onto MRS (De Man-Rogosa-Sharpe) agar to enumerate lactic acid bacteria (Becton and Dickinson, Cockeysville, USA; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). To differentiate E. faecium CCM 4231 strain from other enterococci, its rifampicin marked variant was prepared by the subsequent cultivation of the strain using Todd-Hewitt agar (Becton and Dickinson) with rifampicin (100 |ag/ml) at 37[degrees]C (Strompfova, 2004). L. plantarum CCM 4000 as well as L. fermentum LF2 were also marked by rifampicin to differentiate them among the counts of lactic acid bacteria. Moreover, the identity of the inoculants (E. faecium, L. fermentum and L. plantarum) during ensiling and in the silage was also confirmed by the PCR method according to Woodford et al. (1997), Chagnaud et al. (2001) and Bethier and Ehrlich (1998). Bacterial counts were expressed in colony forming units (log10 cfu) per g [+ or -] SD.
Corn dry matter was determined by oven drying at 103[degrees]C for 16 h. Dried (60[degrees]C, 48 h) samples were analysed for neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF) and lignin (Goering and Van Soest, 1970) using a Fibertec 2010 (Tecator Comp., Sweden). Standard methods were used for determining ash (AOAC, 1990, No. 942 05), nitrogen (AOAC, 1990, No. 968 06), fat (AOAC, 1990, No. 983.23) and crude fibre (AOAC, 1990, No. 962 09). In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) of grass and grass silages was determined by the in vitro fermentation gas production method (Varadyova et al., 2005). A water extract of silage was prepared by adding deionized water to 20 g of silage to achieve a total of 300 g. The values of pH, organic acids, and ammonia nitrogen were measured in the water extracts of the samples (AOAC, 1990, No. 920 03). Organic acids--lactic acid and volatile fatty acids (VFA: acetic, propionic, n-butyric acids)--were analysed by the method of Naumann and Bassler (1997). The fatty acids in corn plants and corn silages were determined in lyophilized samples. Lipids from freeze-dried corn and corn silages were extracted using an extraction-transesterification procedure described by Sukhija and Palmquist (1988). A mixture of chloroform and methanol (2:1) was chosen as the extraction solvent. The extracted lipids were dissolved in 1mL hexane with internal standard C13:0 and the esterification of lipids was carried out with 2 ml N sodium metoxide (30 min, 50[degrees]C) and 3 ml 3 N methanolic HCl (60 min, 50[degrees]C). After centrifugation (5 min, 2,500 rpm), samples of the upper hexane layers were used for gas chromatographic analyses. GC analysis of the methyl esters was performed using a GC 6890N Agilent Technology gas chromatograph equipped with a programmed 60 m HP-Innowa capillary column (180-240[degrees]C) and a flame ionization detector.
Statistical analysis used analysis of variance (Graphpad Instat, Graphpad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The model included the effect of uninoculated (CS) and three inoculated corn silages (CS+LP, CS+LF and CS+EF, respectively) on nutrient composition and fermentation parameters. Differences between the control (CS) and experimental silages (CS+LP, CS+LF and CS+EF, respectively) were analysed by one-way analysis of variance using the Student-Newman-Keuls post-test. The counts of the inoculants (Table 4) were analysed using Student t- tests.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Effect of inoculants on chemical composition in corn silage
The nutrient composition of whole corn plants before ensiling is shown in Table 1. Silage samples were subjected to analyses that included determination of dry matter, nitrogen, ash, NDF, ADF, lignin. In addition to these components lactic, propionic, n-butyric and fatty acids were quantified in this experiment. Mean DM content in corn before ensiling was 288.3 g/kg (Table 1) and ensiling decreased DM concentration (Table 2). Control silage had a lower DM content (g/kg) of about 8.8 units and inoculated corn silages (CS+LP, CS+LF, CS+EF) of about 8.1, 17.2, and 10.6 units, respectively, than corn before ensiling (Tables 1 and 2). However, the differences in DM and OM (organic matter) content were significantly less (p<0.05) between the control silage and inoculated corn silages (Table 2). Similar results were presented by Koc et al. (2008) when a mixture of inoculants (L. plantarum+ Pediococcus acidilactici) and enzyme (amylase) at a concentration of 5 x [10.sup.5] and 1 x [10.sup.6] cfu/g in corn silage was used. IVDMD was similar in all corn silages (Table 2). In addition, Filya (2003) found that inoculation of corn silage with inoculants (L. buchneri, L. plantarum or their mixture) did not affect in situ dry matter and organic matter degradability after 48 h of fermentation. Crude protein content in all corn silages significantly increased (p<0.001, CS; p<0.05, CS+LP; p<0.01, CS+LF; p<0.05, CS+EF) compared to corn before ensiling. Nevertheless, crude protein content (g/kg DM) was numerically lower in inoculated silages compared to control silage (Table 2). In addition, Koc et al. (2008) found a decrease (p<0.05) of CP content in inoculated corn silages when the concentration of 5 x [10.sup.5] and 1 x [10.sup.6] cfu/g was used. However, Baytok et al. (2005) found that a higher concentration (1 x [10.sup.11] cfu/g) of the same inoculant did not affect CP concentration in corn silage. The crude fiber content was higher in all corn silages compared to corn before ensiling, but significantly (p< 0. 01) only in CS+EF. Crude fiber content in all silages was similar and the differences between corn silages were not significant. Detergent fibre analyses showed that NDF and ADF content in corn silages was increased (p<0.01) in comparison to their content in corn before ensiling (Tables 1, 2), except for CS+LF. However, the differences in NDF and ADF content in corn silages were not significant (Table 2), except for CS+LF. These results are in the agreement with those reported by Filya (2003). Nevertheless, other authors (Baytok et al., 2005; Koc et al., 2008) found a significant decrease in NDF and ADF content in corn silages after inoculation with previously described inoculants.
Effect of inoculants on fermentation parameters in corn silage
The inoculation of ensiled corn silage influenced the fermentation parameters of corn silage. The mean pH values of corn (about pH 5.3) before ensiling decreased during ensiling and all treated silages had higher pH (3.48-3.54) than untreated silage (3.44) after 105 days of ensiling (Table 2). The pH of all corn silages tended to be under the value of 3.55 considered acceptable for corn silages (Kung and Shaver, 2001). Lactic acid and other organic acids, acetic, propionic and n-butyric acids, are usually responsible for most of the drop in silage pH. Lactic acid should be at least 65% to 70% of the total silage acids in well-fermented silage (Shaver, 2003). Lactic acid concentration in control silage (CS) and inoculated silages (CS+LP, CS+LF, CS+EF) represented 85.6%, 84.6%, 85.9%, and 83% of total silage acids (Table 2). The concentrations of acetic and propionic acids were low in all corn silages (below 1.85% and 0.17%); the concentrations of n-butyric acid were not detectable. High moisture (about 25% DM) corn silage usually has a low acetic acid content (less than 1%, Kung and Shaver, 2001). Similar results were presented by Sucu and Filya (2006), and Koc et al. (2008) when bacterial inoculants (L. plantarum+E. faecium) or (L. plantarum+ amylase+Pediococcus acidilactici) were used in corn silages. The ratio of lactic acid (LA) to acetic acid (AA) is a good indicator of the efficiency of the silage fermentation. Ideally, the ratio of lactic acid to acetic acid should not be less than 3:1 and higher is better (Kung and Shaver, 2001). Addition of inoculants slightly decreased LA: AA ratio from control silage (6.61:1) to inoculant-treated corn silage (CS+LP, 6.16:1; CS+LF, 6.43:1; CS+EF, 5.36:1). Total acid concentration, which indicates the extent of fermentation during ensiling, was higher (+0.42%) in CS+LP, and lower (-0.97% CS+LF; -1.26% CS+EF) than in control silage (CS, Table 2). In other experiments, the inoculants L. plantarum, L. plantarum+L. buchneri (Filya, 2003), or L. plantarum+ Pediococcus acidilacti+amylase (Baytok et al., 2005; Koc et al., 2008) significantly increased lactic acid production. In contrast, the inoculants L. plantarum+Pediococcus acidilacti+amylase (Baytok et al., 2005; Koc et al., 2008) and L. plantarum alone significantly decreased and the inoculants L. plantarum+L. buchneri or L. buchneri alone significantly increased acetic acid production in corn silages. The use of 10 different commercial lactic acid bacteria as the inoculants showed different effects on LA and AA production in corn silages (Weinberg et al., 2007). The ash, fat and crude protein contents were unchanged in all corn silages after ensiling compared to the control (Table 2). Ammonia concentration can be expressed as a percentage of the crude protein. Ideally, ammonia should be <7% of the protein content. Our results showed that the proportion of ammonia nitrogen in crude protein (g/kg DM) content constituted 0.49%, 0.46%, 0.84%, and 0.5% for the control and inoculated (CS+LP, CS+LF and CS+EF) corn silages, respectively. In inoculated corn silages, the ammonia concentration significantly (p<0.05, CS+LF) or numerically decreased (CS+LP, CS+EF) in comparison to control silage. McDonald et al. (1991) reported that lower pH values inhibited protein degradation in silages. Therefore, the concentrations of ammonia-N of all corn silages were low (0.29-0.43 g/kg DM) in this experiment.
Effect of inoculants on fatty acid composition in corn silage
Knowledge regarding the fat content and composition of forages is limited. The alterations in FA composition of corn during ensiling may be due to microbial intervention during the ensiling process, but also enzymes of vegetable origin might be active during ensiling. The proportion of medium chain fatty acids-MCFA ([C.sub.14:0]- [C.sub.17:0]), as well as long chain fatty acids--LCFA (>C18:0), was similar in all corn silages (Table 3). However, the proportion of short chain fatty acids -SCFA ([C.sub.6:0]-[C.sub.12:0])--was significantly (p<0.001) higher in inoculated corn silages in comparison to control silage. The proportion of saturated fatty acids (SFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) was significantly (p< 0.05-0.01) higher in inoculated silages by about 3-5% (SFA) or 3-7% (PUFA), mostly in CS+EF (Table 3) compared to control silage. On the contrary, the proportion of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA, %) was significantly (p<0.001) lower in inoculated silages, mostly in CS+EF. As expected, the isomers of fatty acids--conjugated linoleic acid (CLA, cis 9, trans 11 C18:2) and trans--vaccenic acid (TVA, trans 11 C18:1)--were not detected in the corn silages. They are produced as the intermediary products from rumen biohydrogenation of C18:2 and C18:3 fatty acids (Jenkins, 1993). Of the three main fatty acids, the concentrations (g/100 g of total FA) of oleic acid (C18:1) in inoculated silages were significantly (p<0.001) lower, mostly in CS+EF; linoleic acid (C18:2) was significantly (p<0.001, CS+LF, CS+EF)) or numerically higher (CS+LP) than in control silage. The concentration of a-linolenic acid (C18:3) was significantly higher (p<0.001 for CS+LP and CS+EF, respectively; p<0.01 for CS+LF) compared to control silage. The inoculants (LP CCM 4000, EF CCM 4231) in corn silages significantly lowered (p<0.01, about 1.5 and 1.3 units) or numerically lowered (LF, about 0.7 units) the n-6/n-3 ratio compared to control silage. Elgersma et al. (2003) found that ensiling of grass lowered the contents of most FA, especially of [C.sub.18:1] and [C.sub.18:3,] and ensiling of grass with the addition of L. plantarum inoculant decreased C18:3 concentrations as compared to the control (Lee et al., 2006).
The three probiotic silage inoculants multiplied sufficiently during the ensiling process (Table 4). On day 7 (1 week of ensiling) their counts reached 4.1, 4.60 and 5.23 log10 cfu/g and the counts were well balanced; despite this, the ruminal strain L. plantarum CCM 4000 was enumerated in the highest amounts (5.23 cfu/g). By decreasing the pH value in corn ensiling (Table 2), the counts of inoculants were also decreased; especially the counts of E. faecium CCM 4231 strain on day 22 (2.20 cfu/g). Lactobacilli can survive well in a pH of around 3 (Nemcova, 1997); this is a possible explanation for their enumeration in the count 4.37 and 4.33 cfu/g, respectively 3.20 and 2.90 cfu/g. However, on day 105, all three inoculants were counted at less than 1.00 log10 cfu/g. At the beginning of the ensiling process, the inoculants formed the dominant portion among enterococci and LAB, (Table 4); near the end of ensiling process (105 day) their counts continually decreased. In grass silages produced under the same conditions (the same inoculants), the probiotic inoculants were determined in higher counts (even at the end in silage up to 6.0 cfu/g; Jalc et al., 2008; 2009). The pH values were more acceptable for their growth than in corn ensiling. However, in both grass and corn silages, the inoculants form the main part of the counted enterococci and LAB.
The microbial inoculants did not affect IVDMD, as well as the concentration of total silage acids in inoculated corn silages. Three probiotic inoculants significantly or numerically lowered n-6/n-3 ratio of fatty acids in the inoculated silages and significantly decreased the concentration of [C.sub.18:1], and/or significantly increased the concentration of [C.sub.18:2] and [C.sub.18:3], in the corn silages. Finally, the counts of inoculants decreased during ensiling of corn and, at the end of ensiling (105 days), the counts of inoculants were less than 1.0 log10 cfu/g probably, due to lower pH (3.44-3.54). In future, these inoculated corn silages will be used to study their effect on lipid metabolism in experiments in vitro (artificial rumen) and in vivo (cows).
The study was supported by the project of Slovak Research and Development Agency (APVV- No. 0043-07) and the project of Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic (MZE--No. 00 270 1404), partially also by funds from the Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of Slovak Republic and Slovak Academy of Sciences VEGA (No. 2/0008/08).
Abdehadia, L. O., F. J. Santini and G. A. Gagliostro. 2005. Corn silage or high moisture corn supplements for beef heifers grazing temperate pastures: effects on performance, ruminal fermentation and in situ pasture digestion. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 118:63-78.
AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (Ed. K. Herlick), Arlington, VA, USA, pp. 1230.
Baytok, E., T. Aksu, M. A. Karsli and H. Muruz. 2005. The effects of formic acid, molasses and inoculant as silage additives on corn silage composition and ruminal fermentation characteristics in sheep. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 29:469-474.
Bessa, R. J., J. Santos-Silva, J. M. Ribeiro and A. V. Portugal. 2000. Reticulo-rumen biohydrogenation and enrichment of ruminal edible products with linoleic acid conjugated isomers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:201-211.
Bethier, F. and S. D. Ehrlich. 1998. Rapid species identification within two groups of closely related lactobacilli using PCR primers that target the 16S/23S rRNA spacer region. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 161:97-106.
Chagnaud, P., K. Machinis, L. A. Coutte, A. Marecat and A. Mercenier. 2001. Rapid PCR-based procedure to indentify lactic acid bacteria: application to six common Lactobacillus species. J. Microbiol. Meth. 44:139-148.
Chilliard, Y., A. Ferlay and M. Doreau. 2001. Effect of different type of forages, animal fat or marine oils in cow's diet on milk fat secretion and composition, especially conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Livestock Prod. Sci. 70:31-48.
Chilliard, Y., F.Glasser, A. Ferlay, L. Bernard, J. Rouel and M. Doreau. 2007. Diet, rumen biohydrogenation and nutritional quality of cow and goat milk fat. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 109:828-855.
Coakley, M., R. P. Ross, M. Nordgren, G. Fitzgerald, R. Devery and C. Stanton. 2003. Conjugated linoleic acid biosynthesis by human-derived Bifidobacterium species. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94:138-145.
Elgersma, A., S. Tamminga and G. Ellen. 2006. Modifying milk composition through forage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 131: 207-225.
Elgersma, A., G. Ellen, H. van der Horst, B. G. Muuse, H. Boer and S. Tamminga. 2003. Comparison of the fatty acid composition of fresh and ensiled perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne, L.) affected by cultivar and regrowth interval. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 108:191-205.
Filya, I. 2003. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and Lactobacillus plantarum on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and ruminal degradability of low dry matter corn and sorghum silages. J. Dairy Sci. 86:3575-3581.
Filya, I. and E. Sucu. 2007. The effect of bacterial inoculants and a chemical preservative on the fermentation and aerobic stability of whole-crop cereal silages. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:378-384.
Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analyses. Agriculture Handbook No. 379, USDA, Washington DC, USA, pp. 1-20.
Huhtanen, P., H. Khalili, J. I. Nousiainen, M. Rinne, S. Jaakkola, T. Heikkila and J. Nousiainen. 2002. Prediction of the relative intake potential of grass silage by dairy cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 73:111-130.
Huhtanen, P., Nousiainen, J. I. Khalili, H. Jaakkola and T. Haikkila. 2003. Relationship betwen silage fermentation characteristics and milk production parameters: analyses of literature data. Livest. Prod. Sci. 81:57-73.
Jalc, D., A. Laukova, M. Simonova, Z. Varadyova and P. Homolka. 2009. The use of bacterial inoculants for grass silage: their effects on nutrient composition and fermentation parameters in grass silages. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 54:84-91.
Jalc, D., A. Laukova, Z. Varadyova, P. Homolka and V. Koukolova. 2008. Effect of inoculated grass silages on rumen fermentation and lipid metabolism in an artificial rumen (RUSITEC). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. doi:10.1016/j. anifeedsci.2008.11.004
Jenkins, T. C. 1993. Lipid metabolism in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 76:3851-3863.
Koc, F., L. Coskuntuna and L. Ozduven. 2008. The effect of bacteria + enzyme mixture silage inoculant on the fermentation characteristics, cell wall contents and aerobic stabilities of maize silage. Pakistan J. Anim. Sci. 7:222-226.
Kozakai, K., T. Nakamura, I. Kobayashi, T. Tanigawa, I. Osaka, S. Kawamoto and S. Hara. 2007. Effect of mechanical processing of corn silage on in vitro ruminal fermentation, and in situ bacterial colonization and dry matter degradation. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 87:259-267.
Kung, L. Jr. and R.Shaver. 2001. Interpretation and use of silage fermentation analysis reports. Focus on Forage. 3:1-5.
Laukova, A., M. Marekova and P. Javorsky. 1993. Detection and antimicrobial spectrum of a bacteriocin-like substance produced by Enterococcus faecium CCM4231. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 16:257-260.
Lee, S. W., Y. Chouinard and B. N. Van. 2006. Effect of some factors on the concentration of linolec acid in forages. Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:1525-1538.
Marcinakova, M. 2006. Probiotic microorganisms in the feed and the digestive tract of animals and their role in prevention. PhD Thesis, IAP SAS, Kosice, pp. 1-145.
McDonald, P., A. R. Henderson and S. J. E. Heron. 1991. Plant Enzymes. In: The biochemistry of silage, chapt.3, 2nd. ed. (Ed. P. McDonald, A. R. Henderson and S. J. E. Heron), Chalcomb Publications, Aberystwyth, UK, pp. 48-80.
Naumann, C. and R. Bassler. 1997. Methodenbuch. Band III. Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermittelm. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.
Nemcova, R. 1989. Rumen lactobacilli and their impact for the practice. PhD Thesis, UVM, Kosice, pp. 1-170.
Nemcova, R. 1997. Criteria for selection of lactobacilli for probiotic use. Vet. Med.-Czech, 42:19-27.
Saarisalo, E., E. Skytta, A. Haikara, T. Jalava and S. Jaakkola. 2007. Screening and selection of lactic acid bacteria strains suitable for ensiling grass. J. Appl. Microbiol. 102:327-336.
Shaver, R. D. 2003. Practical application of new forage quality tests. Proceedings of the 6th Western Dairy Management Conference, Reno, NV, USA. pp. 22-25.
Sieber, R., M. Collomb, A. Aeschliemann, P. Jelen and H. Eyer. 2004. Impact of microbial cultures on conjugated linoleic acid in dairy products-a review. Int. Dairy J. 14:1-15.
Strompfova, V. 2004. Production of bacteriocins and probiotic properties of microorganisms in the animals digestive tract and their physiological impact. PhD Thesis, IAP SAS, Kosice, pp. 1-117.
Sucu, E. and I. Filya. 2006. Effects of homofermentative lactic acid bacterial inoculants on the fermentation and aerobic stability characteristics of low dry matter corn silages. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 30:83-88.
Sukhija, P. S. and D. L. Palmquist. 1988. Rapid method for the determination of total fatty acid content and composition of feedstuffs and faeces. J. Agric. Food Chem. 36:1202-1206.
Varadyova, Z., M. Baran and I. Zelenak. 2005. Comparison of two in vitro fermentation gas production methods using both rumen fluid and faecal inoculum from sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 123-124:81-94.
Weinberg, Z. G., Y. Chen and M. Gamburg. 2004. The passage of lactic acid bacteria from silage into rumen fluid, in vitro studies. J. Dairy Sci. 87:3386-3397.
Weinberg, Z. G., O. Shatz, Y. Chen, E. Yosef, M. Nikbahat, D. Ben-Ghedalia and J. Miron. 2007. Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on in vitro digestibility of wheat and corn silages. J. Dairy Sci. 90:4754-4762.
Woodford, N., M. C. Egelton and D. Morrison. 1997. Comparison of PCR with phenotypic methods for the speciation of enterococci. Plenum Press, New York, 47:405-409.
D. Jalc, A. Laukova *, M. Pogany Simonova, Z. Varadyova and P. Homolka (1)
Institute of Animal Physiology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 040 01 Kosice, Slovak Republic
* Corresponding Author: Andrea Laukova. Tel: +421-55-72 92964, Fax: +421-55-7287842, E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
(1) Research Institute of Animal Production, 104 01 Praha 114--Uhrineves, Czech, Republic.
Received May 15, 2008; Accepted February 23, 2009
Table 1. Nutrient composition of corn before ensiling (n = 3) Composition Dry matter (g/kg) 288.3 Crude protein (g/kg DM) 57.2 Crude fibre 203.6 NDF 513.3 ADF 216.4 Lignin 30.1 Fat 22.8 Ash 53.6 Organic matter 272.9 NDF = Neutral detergent fibre; ADF = Acid detergent fibre. Table 2. Nutrient composition and fermentation parameters in corn ensiled for 105 days (n = 3) Parameter CS CS+LP CS+LF DM (g/kg) 279.5 280.2 271.0 * OM (g/kg) 264.9 265.7 257.2 * Ash (g/kg DM) 52.1 51.4 51.0 Crude protein 68.9 63.2 64.4 Crude fibre 213.9 209.0 210.7 NDF 526.1 540.5 486.7 *** ADF 243.3 244.8 244.1 Fat 22.9 21.6 23.5 IVDMD (%) 76.1 76.5 74.9 pH 3.44 3.48 * 3.50 ** Lactic acid (g/kg DM) 11.13 11.41 10.3 Acetic acid 1.68 1.85 1.60 Propionic acid 0.17 0.15 0.11 * n-butyric acid -- -- -- [NH.sub.3]-N 0.34 0.29 0.43 * Parameter CS+EF Pooled SEM DM (g/kg) 277.6 1.8 OM (g/kg) 263.3 * 1.8 Ash (g/kg DM) 51.7 1.1 Crude protein 63.6 7.6 Crude fibre 220.0 9.1 NDF 523.4 5.1 ADF 250.8 3.2 Fat 22.3 0.7 IVDMD (%) 78.2 3.8 pH 3.54 *** 0.01 Lactic acid (g/kg DM) 9.76 0.7 Acetic acid 1.82 0.1 Propionic acid 0.14 0.01 n-butyric acid -- -- [NH.sub.3]-N 0.32 0.02 CS = Corn silage; DM = Dry matter; IVDMD = In vitro dry matter digestibility; NDF = Neutral detergent fibre; ADF = Acid detergent fibre. EF = Enterococcus faecium CCM 4231; LF = Lactobacillus fermentum LF2; LP = Lactobacillus plantarum CCM 4000. * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001 (comparing to CS). Table 3. The fatty acid composition of corn silage after 105 days of ensiling (n = 3) FA (g/100 g) CS CS+LP CS+LF CS+EF SEM [C.sub.8:0] 0.08 0.10 ** 0.19 *** 0.16 *** 0.004 [C.sub.10:0] 0.09 0.12 0.16 ** 0.09 0.01 [C.sub.12:0] 0.34 0.39 ** 0.56 *** 0.52 *** 0.01 [C.sub.14:0] 0.98 1.23 *** 1.42 *** 1.02 * 0.01 [C.sub.16:0] 17.1 17.9 ** 17.1 16.8 0.14 [C.sub.17:0] 0.33 0.44 *** 0.35 0.33 0.01 [C.sub.18:0] 7.42 8.19 ** 7.86 * 8.44 *** 0.09 [C.sub.18:1] n-9 23.2 17.7 *** 17.3 *** 15.0 *** 0.30 [C.sub.18:1] n-7 1.19 1.03 * 0.77 *** 0.64 *** 0.04 [C.sub.18:2] n-6 37.6 38.5 41.0 *** 41.4 *** 0.37 [C.sub.18:3] n-6 0.23 0.12 0.28 0.34 0.04 [C.sub.18:3] n-3 6.32 8.83 *** 7.71 ** 8.89 *** 0.22 SFA (%) 26.4 31.13 ** 29.6 * 31.5 ** 0.73 MUFA 25.9 20.02 *** 19.0 *** 16.4 *** 0.69 PUFA 45.3 48.9 * 50.1 * 52.2 ** 0.99 SCFA 1.09 1.60 *** 2.0 *** 1.99 *** 0.01 MCFA 19.7 20.9 19.8 18.8 0.51 LCFA 79.2 77.5 78.2 79.2 1.0 CS = Corn silage; SFA = Saturated fatty acids; UFA = Unsaturated fatty acids; SCFA = ([C.sub.6:0]-[C.sub.120]); MCFA = [C.sub.140-[C.sub.170]; LCFA>C18.0. EF = Enterococcus faecium CCM 4231; LF = Lactobacillus fermentum LF2; LP = Lactobacillus plantarum CCM 4000. * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001 (comparing to CS). Table 4. The counts of the inoculants, enterococci and lactic acid bacteria in corn silages Silages ME/MRS-rif Enterococci Day 0-1 Control nd 3.57 [+ or -] 0.47 EF CCM 4231 nd 6.36 [+ or -] 0.89 LF2 nd 3.38 [+ or -] 0.28 LP CCM 4000 nd 5.94 [+ or -] 0.17 Day 7 Control nd 4.77 [+ or -] 0.00 EF CCM 4231 4.11 [+ or -] 0.00 6.17 [+ or -] 1.87 LF2 4.60 [+ or -] 0.00 5.62 [+ or -] 1.52 LP CCM 4000 5.23 [+ or -] 0.00 5.32 [+ or -] 0.07 Day 22 Control nd 3.70 [+ or -] 0.40 EF CCM 4231 2.20 [+ or -] 0.90 2.62 [+ or -] 1.52 LF2 4.37 [+ or -] 0.77 3.93 [+ or -] 0.03 LP CCM 4000 4.33 [+ or -] 0.23 3.65 [+ or -] 1.05 Day 40 Control nd 1.00 [+ or -] 0.10 EF CCM 4231 <1.00 <1.00 LF2 3.20 [+ or -] 0.10 1.10 [+ or -] 0.00 LP CCM 4000 2.90 [+ or -] 0.00 1.35 [+ or -] 0.25 Day 105 Control nd <1.00 EF CCM 4231 <1.00 <1.00 LF2 <1.00 <1.00 LP CCM 4000 <1.00 <1.00 Silages LAB Day 0-1 Control 4.91 [+ or -] 1.23 EF CCM 4231 4.12 [+ or -] 1.94 LF2 6.04 [+ or -] 0.00 LP CCM 4000 5.43 [+ or -] 1.21 Day 7 Control 7.03 [+ or -] 0.08 EF CCM 4231 7.10 [+ or -] 0.15 LF2 7.27 [+ or -] 0.04 LP CCM 4000 6.69 [+ or -] 0.22 Day 22 Control 6.40 [+ or -] 0.30 EF CCM 4231 6.10 [+ or -] 0.00 LF2 6.30 [+ or -] 0.00 LP CCM 4000 6.60 [+ or -] 0.50 Day 40 Control 3.90 [+ or -] 0.80 EF CCM 4231 5.39 [+ or -] 0.85 LF2 3.39 [+ or -] 0.09 LP CCM 4000 4.35 [+ or -] 0.05 Day 105 Control 1.10 [+ or -] 0.00 EF CCM 4231 <1.00 LF2 <1.00 LP CCM 4000 <1.00 Nd = Not determined, ME/MRS-rif = M-Enterococcus medium and MRS medium enriched with rifampicin were used to differ the inoculants from the other bacteria, LAB = Lactic acid bacteria. The counts are expressed in log 10 cfu/g [+ or -] SD; EF CCM 4231 = Enterococcus faecium; LF2 = Lactobacillus fermentum; LP CCM 4000 = Lactobacillus plantarum.