Backlash Against Welfare Mothers: Past and Present.Backlash Against Welfare Mothers: Past and Present. By Ellen Reese (Berkeley and Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. : University of California Press "UC Press" redirects here, but this is also an abbreviation for University of Chicago Press University of California Press, also known as UC Press, is a publishing house associated with the University of California that engages in academic publishing. , 2005. xvi plus 355 pp.). Mention welfare backlash and most people will think of cuts in social spending that began during the administration of Ronald Reagan or the assault on AFDC AFDC abbr. Aid to Families with Dependent Children AFDC n abbr (US) (= Aid to Families with Dependent Children) → ayuda a familias con hijos menores AFDC n abbr during the first half of the 1990s. Historians and those with longer memories will recall the "suitable home" policies of the 1950s designed to restrict Aid to Dependent Children payments or the draconian dra·co·ni·an adj. Exceedingly harsh; very severe: a draconian legal code; draconian budget cuts. [After Draco. anti-welfare policies directed at black migrants briefly in place in Newburgh, New York New York, state, United States New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of , in 1961. Ellen Reese, a sociologist who teaches at the University of California, Riverside The University of California, Riverside, commonly known as UCR or UC Riverside, is a public research university and one of ten campuses of the University of California system. , sees all these episodes as part of a sustained campaign against welfare that began in the 1940s mainly at state and local levels, gathered steam in the following decades, and reached many, if not all, its goals with the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA, Pub.L. 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105, enacted 1996-08-22), is a United States federal law that was considered to be a fundamental shift in both the method and goal of federal cash of 1996 (popularly known as "Welfare Reform"). This anti-welfare history, she claims, tracked the larger story of conservatism's emergence, growth, and eventual hegemony in American politics. In the case of welfare, the driving force for restrictive change came from employers of low wage labor and their allies. Reinforcing their case against welfare were racist stereotypes and moral jeremiads about the influence of public assistance on sexual behavior sexual behavior A person's sexual practices–ie, whether he/she engages in heterosexual or homosexual activity. See Sex life, Sexual life. and family stability. Reese states her thesis succinctly. "Since the late 1940s, ideologically conservative and low-wage employers, concerned with protecting their supply of cheap labor and minimizing their taxes, and politicians representing their interests have been on the forefront of campaigns against poor mothers and welfare rights." (199) Reese combines an intelligent synthesis of the literature on welfare history and the rise of the political right with her own research in primary sources. Much of her story will be familiar to readers reasonably well read in both fields; it will be very useful for those with less background. Her most original interpretive contribution is her stress on the continued and powerful influence of employers of low-wage labor on welfare policy, a line of argument harking back to Piven and Cloward's classic Regulating the Poor but relatively neglected in more recent scholarship. Reese buttresses this interpretation with a quantitative analysis Quantitative Analysis A security analysis that uses financial information derived from company annual reports and income statements to evaluate an investment decision. Notes: that shows the relationship between selected characteristics of states which did and did not restrict ADC (1) See A/D converter. (2) (Apple Display Connector) A peripheral connector from Apple that combines digital video display, USB and power in one cable. eligibility between 1949 and 1960. The analysis highlights the influence of both race and agriculture--the major source of low-wage labor. "The quantitative analysis indicates that both the size of the black population and caseload case·load n. The number of cases handled in a given period, as by an attorney or by a clinic or social services agency. caseload Noun and the strength of agribusinesses had a statistically significant independent effect on the odds that states would restrict welfare in the 1950s." (66) Reese writes from the point of view of an activist as well as a scholar. Her book starts with a long discussion undermining the chorus of bipartisan praise for the impact of the 1996 welfare reform bill and ends with an agenda for the future that emerges from her interpretation of welfare history. She rightly points to the need for a coalition of organized labor Organized Labor An association of workers united as a single, representative entity for the purpose of improving the workers' economic status and working conditions through collective bargaining with employers. Also known as "unions". and welfare rights activists--groups which split in the last few decades--to advance progressive politics that serve the interests of both groups. Also rightly, she understands that putting such a coalition together and reversing the thrust of policy during the last half century will be very difficult. While Reese's argument is generally convincing, her discussion of welfare history and mothers' pensions in the early twentieth-century shows less familiarity with the historiography historiography Writing of history, especially that based on the critical examination of sources and the synthesis of chosen particulars from those sources into a narrative that will stand the test of critical methods. and sources than does her account of later events. For one thing, a case could be made for extending the "welfare backlash" back to the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. On the other hand, she does not point out the broad and favorable meanings of "welfare" and "welfare state" before the 1950s. Nor does her interpretation of the rise of anti-welfare state sentiment in the 1950s give sufficient weight to the Cold War's association of social benefits with European socialism and the consequent red-baiting that occurred, and her decision to equate "welfare" with public assistance perpetuates the imprecision that underlies and reinforces popular misunderstandings about America's welfare state. She also misses the story, told recently by Jennifer Mittelstadt (From Welfare to Workfare work·fare n. A form of welfare in which capable adults are required to perform work, often in public-service jobs, as a condition of receiving aid. [work + (wel)fare.] [2005]), of how liberals sponsored the first federal work requirements in public assistance legislation and regulations. The bulk of 1950s and 1960s state restrictions Reese discusses occurred in the South. It is not clear that a parallel welfare backlash, or at least one of such intensity, was forming in the North and Midwest. Southern antagonism to public assistance reflected the continued importance of agriculture to the region's post-World War II economy because agriculture was the prime beneficiary of low-wage labor--a distinction Reese does not make with sufficient clarity in places where she tends to equate agricultural interests with business interests in general. At some points, moreover, the book suffers a bit from special-pleading, as when Reese writes: "The persistence of ... stereotypes of welfare recipients ... bear little relationship to reality. While blacks disproportionately receive welfare, they made up only about 39 percent of all cases in 2000...." (28) True enough, but that is more than three times their representation in the population--a fact that needs to be recognized forthrightly, not minimized, in policy analyses and responses. These qualifications are not meant to obscure the basic point that Reese has written a spirited, coherent, well-documented, and remarkably lucid account of America's post-World War II welfare backlash. Her book will be important reading for all those who want to understand this strand of policy history or to reverse its direction. Michael B. Katz University of Pennsylvania (body, education) University of Pennsylvania - The home of ENIAC and Machiavelli. http://upenn.edu/. Address: Philadelphia, PA, USA. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion