Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,547,093 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

BIG CITIES SUFFER COURT SETBACK\L.A. to lose $150 million in census case; Southland won't gain\House seat.


Byline: Rick Orlov Daily News Staff Writer

The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow Wednesday to Los Angeles and other major cities by rejecting a call to revise the 1990 census upward to compensate for an undercount of minorities.

In a unanimous decision that will cost the city of Los Angeles more than $150 million and California a representative in Congress, the court said the Census Bureau made an extraordinary effort to adjust the population count and that no remedy is necessary.

"In 1990, the Census Bureau . . . was successful in counting 98.4 percent of the population," wrote Chief Justice William Rehnquist.

The court said it has been known for more than 50 years that some segments of the population - particularly minorities - are undercounted, but that the bureau is improving its methods.

Los Angeles officials, calling themselves disappointed by the court's ruling, said they hope the census in 2000 will deal with issues raised in the lawsuit, originally filed by New York City.

"We respect the court's decision," Mayor Richard Riordan said in a statement. "Nonetheless, minorities in Los Angeles and in other cities historically have been undercounted.

"We believe that more than 100,000 Angelenos were not counted by the federal government in the 1990 census. This must change. Every Angeleno deserves to be counted."

Riordan said the decision will mean the loss of $150 million in federal funds - primarily community development block grants - allocated on a population basis.

"In the time of fiscal belt-tightening, these losses hurt all the more."

The ruling also costs Southern California - probably in the Orange-Riverside County area - an additional member of Congress. California already has the largest congressional delegation with 52 members in the House of Representatives.

A lower court ruled that the Census Bureau would have to adjust its 1990 figures, but the Clinton administration appealed despite pressure from local officials in Los Angeles and New York.

COPYRIGHT 1996 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1996, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Date:Mar 21, 1996
Words:316
Previous Article:VAN NUYS PARK GOING TO THE DOGS\Commission approves leash-free zone.(News)
Next Article:LAPD MAY LEASE DWP SITE\City says land price unfair to taxpayers.(News)



Related Articles
High Court case may affect MTA minority pacts. (Los Angeles County, California Metropolitan Transportation Authority)
Judge hands owners of Venice's Lincoln Place a big win in court. (victory of Los Angeles Lincoln Place Investors Ltd. in a court dispute)
Election 2000--the States Are Crucial.(Brief Article)
Census Surprise!(2000 census results)(Statistical Data Included)
STRIDES MADE IN MAIL-IN CENSUS COUNT.(News)(Statistical Data Included)
CENSUS LIKELY TO GIVE STATE 1 HOUSE SEAT DATA RELEASE TO LAUNCH REAPPORTIONMENT FIGHT.(News)
CALIFORNIA ADDS MORE PEOPLE THAN ANY STATE UP 4,111,627!(News)(Statistical Data Included)
HAHN VOWS BATTLE TO ALLOW STATISTICAL COUNT FOR 2000.(NEWS)(Statistical Data Included)
HIGH COURT FROWNS ON RACIAL CENSUS ADJUSTMENT.(NEWS)
Supreme Court tackles Texas: the high court bas waded into the thicket of Texas politics, agreeing to review controversial redistricting there that...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles