Available Now - 2008 Strategies for Trademark Disputes: Top Lawyers Share Best Practices for Trademark Litigation, Settlements & Negotiations.DUBLIN, Ireland -- Research and Markets (http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/924362/2008_strategies_fo) has announced the addition of the "2008 Strategies for Trademark Disputes: Top Lawyers Share Best Practices for Trademark Litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute. When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation. , Settlements & Negotiations" report to their offering. The video seminar features the perspectives of trademark specialists Anthony L. Fletcher Fletcher may refer to one of the following: Ideas and companies
 This article or section is written like an .Please help [ rewrite this article] from a neutral point of view. Mark blatant advertising for , using . LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol ), Parker H. Bagley (Partner, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP), and Bruce R. Ewing (Partner, Dorsey & Whitney LLP). Personalize per·son·al·ize tr.v. per·son·al·ized, per·son·al·iz·ing, per·son·al·iz·es 1. To take (a general remark or characterization) in a personal manner. 2. To attribute human or personal qualities to; personify. their best practices to enhance your own client strategies, develop ideas for landing more clients, and stay up to date on the latest trademark thought leadership. Watch the video seminar on your computer during a flight, train ride or even while exercising on your iPod. The 2008 Strategies for Trademark Disputes video seminar focuses on: * A detailed look at the most up-to-date and successful best practices and client strategies being used in trademark disputes * What clients look for when hiring a lawyer/firm for trademark disputes * Litigation strategies, roles and motivations of each party * New strategies being used to evaluate financial exposure and how to proceed in a litigation situation * How to fine tune your negotiation/litigation strategies for a case based on the latest settlements and verdicts * Considerations when drafting pleadings pleadings: see procedure. and declarations * An up to date look at federal trademark laws that regulate infringement, trademark dilution Trademark dilution is a trademark law concept forbidding the use of a famous trademark in a way that would lessen its uniqueness. In most cases, trademark dilution involves an unauthorized use of another's trademark on products that do not compete with, and have little connection , counterfeiting counterfeiting, manufacturing spurious coins, paper money, or evidences of governmental obligation (e.g., bonds) in the semblance of the true. There must be sufficient resemblance to the genuine article to deceive a person using ordinary caution. , and false advertising * Case studies of other trademark dispute cases and what they mean for current cases Samples of the types of questions answered in the video seminar include: * What external factors play an important role in helping you decide the best course of action for your client? How do these factors affect your strategy? How is this different in 2008 versus last year? * In 2008, what are the areas or factors that work in your client's favor for hopefully achieving a positive result in trademark litigation? How do you use these factors to your client's benefit? How do you minimize any negative factors that could adversely affect your client's outcome? * In the last year, what strategies have you developed personally to help executives and companies with trademark issues? How have these strategies helped to achieve your clients' objectives? * What do you see as your role on behalf of your client in negotiations? How do you work in this role to ensure the best possible outcome for your client? What is your client's role in this stage? * What are the 2-3 items most often negotiated in a trademark litigation matter? Why do you think this is? How do you use these negotiations to gain an upper hand against your opponent? * When would you prefer the case to make it to court? Why? When approaching a trademark litigation trial, what strategies do you engage in to ensure a positive result? How have you found these to be helpful? * How do you judge the financial liability for your clients, when deciding on the best course of action to take? What factors will come into play? What risk is necessary in order to reach a successful outcome? * What are the most significant trademark laws that are affecting companies right now? In what areas do these impact clients? How do these affect the strategies you engage in when part of a trademark litigation matter? * How have trademark laws and litigation strategies changed over the past year? Do you think these changes have been positive or negative? Why? How have these changes affected your personal strategies? Why? * What are the areas or factors that work in your client's favor for hopefully achieving positive results in copyright trademark litigation? - What most often kills trademark litigation settlement negotiations? What points are the hardest to bridge? Why do you think this is? What is it about copyright trademark litigation that does not lend itself to settlement? * What do you consider a success from a negotiations standpoint? Why? What does your success depend on? * What types of cases within trademark litigation most often result in settlements? Why do you think this is? Are there certain aspects that will lend themselves toward settlement? * What are three most important areas that have made you a successful negotiator on behalf of your clients? How have your negotiation strategies changed in the last year? * How has technology influenced trademark litigation in the last year? What court decisions are being influenced by modern technology? * How has global commerce impacted U.S. trademark law in the last year? Is the industrial property of U.S. firms adequately protected? How? * What assessment tools are used to evaluate the urgency of the potential infringement claim? Who is called upon to help during the early stages? * What techniques are used to establish trademark rights for non-conventional trademarks A non-conventional trademark, also known as a nontraditional trademark, is any new type of trademark which does not belong to a pre-existing, conventional category of trade mark, and which is often difficult to register, but which may nevertheless fulfill the essential ? How do these techniques differ from conventional trademark techniques? * Which experts are instrumental when the trademark claim involves unique industries? * What negotiation strategies are most effective when defending an infringement claim? What settlement terms are preferred by the defense? Why? * How do negotiation tactics for the plaintiff change when the trademark is not registered? What methods are used to establish a strong negotiating position under these circumstances CIRCUMSTANCES, evidence. The particulars which accompany a fact. 2. The facts proved are either possible or impossible, ordinary and probable, or extraordinary and improbable, recent or ancient; they may have happened near us, or afar off; they are public or ? * What creative settlement options exist for international firms? How can you negotiate trademark rights across borders and satisfy both parties? When is it best to take a rigid position? * What calculations are important for assessing damages? How are future or potential damages valued? What arguments are used to contest the opponent's damage calculations? How is this different than in 2007? How do you think this might be different in 2009? About the Keynote Speakers Parker Bagley is a partner in the Intellectual Property Group of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP specializing in trademark, patent, copyright, trade secret, false advertising and internet domain name An organization's unique name on the Internet. The chosen name combined with a top level domain (TLD), such as .com or .org, also called a "domain extension," makes up the Internet domain name. For example, computerlanguage.com is the domain name for the publisher of this Encyclopedia. litigation, and client counseling. Mr. Bagley was named one of the top four trademark litigators in the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. in a 1999 Managing Intellectual Property survey of IP practitioners. He was also named to Euromoney's "World's Leading Trademark Law Practitioners" in 1997, 1999, 2001, 2003 and 2005 and to the International Who's Who The International Who's Who is a guidebook to notable people worldwide. It has been published annually since 1941 by Europa Publications, an imprint of Taylor and Francis. of Business Lawyers in 2002 through 2005. Anthony L. Fletcher is Senior Counsel in Fish & Richardson P.C.'s New York New York, state, United States New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of office. Mr. Fletcher specializes in trademark litigation, counseling and prosecution, with special emphasis on trade dress and trademark survey matters. Marcia B. Paul is Paul I, 1754–1801, czar of Russia (1796–1801), son and successor of Catherine II. His mother disliked him intensely and sought on several occasions to change the succession to his disadvantage. a partner at the New York office of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. She counsels clients in copyright, trademark, libel libel 1) n. to publish in print (including pictures), writing or broadcast through radio, television or film, an untruth about another which will do harm to that person or his/her reputation, by tending to bring the target into ridicule, hatred, scorn or contempt of , advertising, and related intellectual property matters. Bruce Ewing's principal area of focus is in the litigation of intellectual property disputes, primarily in the fields of trademarks and copyrights. He has represented numerous companies, both large and small, in the prosecution and defense of claims for trademark and trade dress infringement, trademark counterfeiting, trademark dilution, cybersquatting Registering an Internet domain name for the purpose of reselling it for a profit. One of the more notable transactions was the domain name wallstreet.com, which was registered in 1994 for $70 and sold for one million in 1999. , copyright infringement Noun 1. copyright infringement - a violation of the rights secured by a copyright infringement of copyright plagiarisation, plagiarization, piracy, plagiarism - the act of plagiarizing; taking someone's words or ideas as if they were your own and false advertising. About the Seminars - Videos That Ignite New Ideas for Busy Professionals Videos enable busy professionals to generate new ideas and strategies for landing more clients, updating your professional best practices, or simply generating new ideas around any topic. Incorporate the thought leadership of hundreds of leading executives and lawyers into your own strategies and capitalize on Cap´i`tal`ize on` v. t. 1. To turn (an opportunity) to one's advantage; to take advantage of (a situation); to profit from; as, to capitalize on an opponent's mistakes s>. new thinking to yield immediate results. Every video displays a list of Idea Generator questions while the video is playing and is guaranteed to provide you with at least three new ideas that you can use immediately. Videos provide professionals of all levels with proven business intelligence, direct and unfiltered Please wikify (format) this article or section as suggested in the Guide to layout and the Manual of Style. Remove this template after wikifying. This article has been tagged since insight in a format that is more engaging and time-efficient than a book, magazine or traveling to a seminar. For more information visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/924362/2008_strategies_fo |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion