Australia's Experiment in Evidence-Based Medicine and Implications for U.S. Healthcare.Healthcare Forum to Explore Promise and Pitfalls of Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis cost-effectiveness analysis Cost-utility analysis Clinical trials A form of economic analysis in which alternative interventions are compared in terms of the cost per unit of clinical effect–eg cost per life saved, per mm Hg of lowered BP, per yr of to Determine Patient Access to Biotech bi·o·tech n. Informal Biotechnology. biotech Noun short for biotechnology Noun 1. Medicines First bullet in Who section should read: Kwabena Kwabena is a given name and a surname, and may refer to:
The corrected release reads: AUSTRALIA'S EXPERIMENT IN EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE evidence-based medicine Decision-making 'The use of scientific data to confirm that proposed diagnostic or therapeutic procedures are appropriate in light of their high probability of producing the best and most favorable outcome'. See Meta-analysis. AND IMPLICATIONS FOR U.S. HEALTHCARE U.S. Healthcare is a now-defunct healthcare company. The logo had an apple. The merger with Aetna In 1996, the company merged with Aetna, calling it Aetna U.S. Healthcare. The U.S. Healthcare apple logo was next to the Aetna name, and U.S. Healthcare under it. U.S. Healthcare Forum to Explore Promise and Pitfalls of Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Determine Patient Access to Biotech Medicines
Who:
-- Kwabena Adubofour, medical director, East Main Clinic and
Stockton Diabetes Intervention Center
-- Meryl Comer, journalist and caregiver
-- Randolph Frankel, vice president of public affairs and
government relations, IMS Health
-- Marjorie Ginsburg, executive director, Sacramento Healthcare
Decisions
-- John Graham, director, Health Care Studies, Pacific Research
Institute and former director of health and pharmaceutical
policy research at Canada's Fraser Institute
-- Ruth Lopert, Harkness fellow in health care policy, George
Washington University and principal advisor, Pharmaceutical
Policy Taskforce, Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing,
Canberra, Australia
-- Peter J. Pitts, co-founder and president, Center for Medicines
in the Public Interest, and former FDA associate commissioner
for external relations
What: As state and federal policymakers search for ways to rein in
drug spending, they are considering methods employed in foreign
countries, particularly Australia, which require comparative
effectiveness and cost-effectiveness as a prerequisite for drug
coverage. The California Healthcare Institute and the Pacific
Research Institute have assembled policy experts from Australia
and the U.S. to discuss the pros and cons of applying this
approach to U.S. coverage and how it might affect patients'
access to innovative medicines for cancer, Alzheimer's disease
and other conditions.
When: Friday, December 15, 2006
7:30 - 10:30 a.m. PST (Continental breakfast will be served)
Where: St. Regis Hotel, 125 3rd Street, San Francisco, California
Live Video Broadcast:
http://www.innovation.org/index.cfm/NewsCenter/Briefings/Cost-
Effectiveness_Analysis_Conference (Due to its length, this URL may
need to be copied/pasted into your Internet browser's address field.
Remove the extra space if one exists.)
Why: Cost-effectiveness analysis is a subject of intense interest to
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and in many states across
the country. The "Evidence, Economics, and Politics:
Australia's Experiment in Evidence-Based Medicine" forum seeks
to discuss and debate how this policy would affect new science,
investment in biotechnology, and patients in the U.S.
|
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion