Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,604,530 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Auditors lambast farm pay scheme; Grant system is 'expensive and chaotic'.


Byline: Emily Beaumont

THE process for paying EU subsidies to farmers was a "masterclass of misadministration", it was claimed yesterday after a National Audit Office review criticised the high and increasing costs of the scheme.

The third examination by the NAO NAO National Audit Office (UK government)
NAO North Atlantic Oscillation
NAO National Astronomical Observatory (Japan)
NAO North American Operations
NAO non-asbestos organic
 of the single payment scheme, which manages grants paid to farmers for maintaining land, found administration of the scheme did not provide value for money for taxpayers. The NAO's report accused the Rural Payments Agency The Rural Payments Agency (RPA) (previously the Intervention Board) is an executive agency of the British Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). The RPA delivers payments to farmers and traders in excess of £2 billion.  (RPA), which administers the scheme, and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) is the United Kingdom government department responsible for environmental protection, food production and standards, agriculture, fisheries and rural communities in England.  (Defra) of showing scant regard for protecting public money in the process of handing out grants.

The NAO review said the cost of processing claims from landowners had risen by more than a fifth since the scheme first got under way in 2005, and now stood at an estimated pounds 1,743 per claim - compared to pounds 285 under the simpler Scottish system.

It added the IT system did not meet the scheme's needs and cost pounds 350m in total, with pounds 130m in upgrades and maintenance needed since 2007.

Since the single payment scheme's inception, it has racked up more the pounds 680m in "unforeseen additional costs" including pounds 304m in extra staff costs and pounds 280m paid to the European Commission for errors in administration and late payment penalties. The NAO also said there had been overpayments to farmers of between pounds 55m and pounds 90m but there was little clarity as to exactly how much money had been overpaid o·ver·pay  
v. o·ver·paid , o·ver·pay·ing, o·ver·pays

v.tr.
1. To pay (a party) too much.

2. To pay an amount in excess of (a sum due).

v.intr.
To pay too much.
.

Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee, MP Edward Leigh Edward Julian Egerton Leigh (born 20 July 1950) is a politician in the United Kingdom. He is Conservative Member of Parliament for Gainsborough in Lincolnshire, and was first elected in 1983. He has served as Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee since 2001. , said: "The Rural Payments Agency's administration of the Single Payment Scheme for paying EU grants to farmers has been a masterclass of misadministration."

He accused the agency of shoddy book-keeping and "lamentable la·men·ta·ble  
adj.
Inspiring or deserving of lament or regret; deplorable or pitiable. See Synonyms at pathetic.



lamen·ta·bly adv.
" communication with farmers, many of whom were paid late and the wrong amounts in the past few years.

He said farmers - many of whom rely on the payments - continued to have little idea how much and when they would be paid, and many received letters out of the blue demanding back sums which had been overpaid, even if nothing was owed.

The report found that payments to farmers had become more prompt, with more than 96% of 2008 claims paid by mid May 2009, compared to 80% by the same month in 2006.

But Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, said that after looking at the single payment scheme for the third time, there were still "significant issues to be resolved".

"There has been a serious lack of attention to the protection of taxpayers' interests over the administration of the scheme."

And he said: "Previous assurances on overall progress in recovering overpayments from farmers proved optimistic and reflect a lack of reliable information on actual progress." He called on Defra to "urgently address" the risks to ongoing IT system support and the inaccuracy of data.
COPYRIGHT 2009 MGN Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:The Journal (Newcastle, England)
Date:Oct 15, 2009
Words:480
Previous Article:Events give glimpse into future.
Next Article:Brother and sister found murdered at dad's home.
Topics:



Related Articles
Subsidy fiasco; Farmers `failed by Welsh Assembly'.
First SPS payouts to be made this month.
Wales: Paying off; COUNTRYS IDE IMPROVES UNDER TIR GOFAL.
Nancy is moving on to fresh fields; farming.
Time running out for worker reward scheme; BUSINESS INSIGHTS in association with RBS.
Hill farms 'betrayed' by new agri-scheme; pounds 89m Glastir heralds a revolution in uplands.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles