Atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection and prolonged diarrhea in children.

Some clinical isolates of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) lack bundle-forming pili and are termed atypical EPEC. The aim of this study was to determine if atypical EPEC are pathogens by comparing the clinical features of patients infected with atypical EPEC with those of children infected with other causative agents of diarrhea. Fecal samples obtained from children attending the Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne for investigation of diarrhea were examined for adenovirus, rotavirus, Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., protozoa, and pathogenic E. coli. Clinical data were obtained by using a standardized pro forma and analyzed separately. Patients infected with atypical EPEC experienced mild, nondehydrating, and noninflammatory diarrhea that was not particularly associated with fever, vomiting, or abdominal pain. However, the duration of diarrhea in patients infected with atypical EPEC was significantly longer than that caused by the other species or where no pathogens were identified. Infection with atypical EPEC is associated with prolonged diarrhea.

**********

The varieties of Escherichia coli that cause diarrhea are classified into pathogenic groups (pathotypes) according to their virulence determinants (1,2). The specific nature of these virulence determinants imbues each pathotype with the capacity to cause clinical syndromes with distinctive epidemiologic and pathologic characteristics (2). For example, enterotoxigenic E. coli causes watery diarrhea in children in developing countries and in travelers to those countries, whereas enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) may cause hemorrhagic colitis and the hemolytic uremic syndrome because of the production of Shiga toxins. Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) shares several key virulence determinants with the most common varieties of EHEC but does not produce Shiga toxins nor cause hemorrhagic colitis or hemolytic uremic syndrome. Instead, it causes nonspecific gastroenteritis, especially in children in developing countries (3,4). EPEC also differs from other pathotypes of E. coli in that it typically carries an EPEC adherence factor plasmid (pEAF). This plasmid encodes 1) bundle-forming pili (Bfp), which promote bacterial adherence to epithelial cells and are an essential virulence determinant (5), and 2) a transcriptional activator, Per, that upregulates genes within a chromosomal pathogenicity island, termed the locus for enterocyte effacement (6,7). This pathogenicity island encodes a number of essential virulence proteins, including the surface protein intimin (the product of the eae gene), which is required to produce the attaching-effacing lesions that are a key feature of EPEC-induced pathology. A subset of EPEC, known as atypical EPEC, do not carry pEAF and hence do not produce Bfp or Per (4). Accordingly, their role in disease is controversial. Recently, we and others investigated the causes of community-acquired gastroenteritis in Melbourne (8, 9). Among the infectious agents that were sought in these studies was atypical EPEC, which emerged as the single most frequent pathogen in the study population (9).

To determine if atypical EPEC are also responsible for diarrhea in hospitalized children, we undertook a comprehensive microbiologic study of patients with diarrhea at the Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne.

Patients and Methods

Patients

Patients were children with diarrhea attending the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, between March 1 and August 31, 2003. They were considered for inclusion in the study when an obviously loose stool sample from a child <14 years of age was received at the Diagnostic Microbiology Laboratory for investigation. After their caregivers, attending physicians, and medical records had been consulted, patients were considered eligible for inclusion in the study if, during the current illness, they had passed [greater than or equal to] 3 loose stools within a day or had experienced loose stools plus vomiting, abdominal pain, or rectal bleeding. Patients with chronic gastrointestinal disorders, such as inflammatory bowel or celiac disease, were excluded, as were those with cystic fibrosis, leukemia, and other immunosuppressive disorders. Repeat samples and samples from children who had received antimicrobial agents within the preceding week were also excluded.

Clinical data were obtained in accordance with a standardized pro forma and were analyzed before the results of the laboratory findings were known. Data collected included age; gender; date of onset of illness; symptoms and clinical signs, including characteristics of stools, abdominal pain, vomiting (number per day and duration), fever, abdominal tenderness, largest number of bowel movements in a 24-hour period preceding the sample collection, and extent of dehydration. Duration of diarrhea was estimated from the passage of the first loose stool to the patient's last appearance in the ward or 1 day after discharge. Patients with temperatures of [greater than or equal to] 38[degrees]C, taken by tympanic thermometer, were considered febrile. Severity of illness was estimated by using the 20-point scale developed by Ruuska and Vesikari (10).

Laboratory Methods

All stool specimens were the first specimen obtained from a patient on a hospital visit, and specimens were investigated within 4 hours of collection. Specimens were examined macroscopically for color and consistency and by light microscopy for leukocytes, erythrocytes, and parasitic forms (amebas, cysts, and ova) by using a saline-and-iodine wet preparation and a modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain for oocysts of Cryptosporidium spp. (11). Samples were tested by enzyme immunoassay for enteric adenoviruses and rotaviruses and cultured for E. coli, Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, and Campylobacter spp. (12).

To reduce the cost of the investigation, diarrheogenic strains of E. coli were sought only during the first 11 weeks of the study, from March 1 to May 15. Bacteria were isolated from fecal samples by direct plating on MacConkey agar (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK). After overnight incubation at 37[degrees]C, a sterile cotton swab was used to transfer the entire growth from each plate into Luria broth containing 30% (vol/vol) glycerol, which was then frozen at -70[degrees]C until required. E. coli pathotypes were identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and confirmed by Southern hybridization (9). Briefly, template DNA for use in PCR was prepared from bacteria isolated from MacConkey agar plates and grown in 2.5 mL MacConkey broth with shaking at 37[degrees]C overnight. Bacteria from this culture were washed in phosphate-buffered saline, resuspended in sterile distilled water, and heated for 10 min at 100[degrees]C. Samples were then placed on ice for 5 min and recentrifuged for 5 min at 16,000 x g. Aliquots of the supernatant were pipetted into sterile tubes, stored at -20[degrees]C for <1 week, and then diluted 1 in 10 in distilled water before being added to the PCR mix. PCR amplifications were performed in a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with the PCR primers and conditions described previously (9). Genes identified by these primers and their association with each pathotype of diarrheogenic E. coli are listed in Table 1. PCR for the lacZ gene, which is present in almost all wildtype strains of E. coli, was included as a control to ensure that negative PCR results were not due to the absence of viable bacteria in the sample or the presence of inhibitors in the reaction mixture. Samples that were PCR negative for lacZ were excluded from further analysis. At the conclusion of the PCR, 10 [micro]L of the reaction mixture underwent electrophoresis on 2.5% 96-well format agarose gels (Electro-fast; Abgene, Epsom, UK). Gels were stained with ethidium bromide, visualized on a UV transilluminator, and photographed. A portion of the PCR product was retained for Southern blotting, which was performed by using capillary transfer of separated DNA fragments onto positively charged nylon membranes (Roche Diagnostics Ltd., Lewes, UK). Digoxigenin-labeled DNA probes were prepared from the control strains of diarrheogenic E. coli listed in Table 1 and used as described (9). PCR- and probe-positive bacteria were assigned to a pathotype according to the criteria in Table 1. Equivocal or ambiguous assays were repeated, and if still unclear, were excluded from further analysis. Atypical EPEC strains were isolated in pure culture from the original sample and then serotyped by using hyperimmune rabbit antisera to O-antigens O1 through O181 (18). These strains were also subjected to PCR to determine the intimin subtype and to investigate the presence of selected virulence-associated genes by using the PCR primers and conditions described previously (9).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of quantitative and qualitative data was performed by using InStat, Version 3.05 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). A 2-tailed p value of <0.05 indicated statistical significance. For the analysis of clinical features associated with infection, patients whose stools yielded >1 pathogen were excluded.

Results

Frequency of Viral, Parasitic, and Bacterial Pathogens

After exclusion of repeat samples and samples from patients >14 years of age or with cystic fibrosis, chronic inflammatory bowel disease, leukemia, or a history of recent antimicrobial drug usage, 303 of 972 consecutive fecal samples remained for analysis. Of these, 134 were from the first period of the study, March 1-May 15, when diarrheogenic E. coli were sought together with other enteropathogens, and 169 were from the period May 16-August 31, when E. coli were not sought.

The frequency of bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens identified during the 2 phases of the study are shown in Table 2. During the first period, a putative etiologic agent was identified in 88 (66%) of 134 children. Diarrheogenic E. coli were found in 42 (31%) of these children, followed by enteric adenovirus (10%), Salmonella sp. (10%), Campylobacter spp. (9%), Giardia sp. (6%), rotavirus (4%), and Cryptosporidium sp. (2%). Of the 42 E. coli isolates, 30 (71%) were EPEC; 6 (14%) were Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), of which 3 were EHEC; 4 (10%) were enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), 1 (2%) was enterotoxigenic E. coli; and 1 (2%) was enteroinvasive E. coli. Nine children (7%) were infected with > 1 pathogen, including 2 concurrently infected with EPEC and adenovirus or EPEC and rotavirus, and 1 each with EPEC and Giardia sp.; STEC and Campylobacter sp.; STEC and Giardia sp.; EAEC and Campylobacter sp., and EAEC and rotavirus.

All EPEC isolates were atypical EPEC (i.e., PCR negative for bfpA). Determination of the O:H serotype and intimin subtype of 29 of the 30 EPEC strains (1 was not viable) indicated that they were highly heterogeneous (Table 3). Although 3 strains (R41, R151, and R446) were O-nontypable:H34, intimin-[alpha]2; and 2 (R89 and R104) were O153:H7, intimin [beta], these isolates were neither temporally nor geographically related to each other and showed some differences in their carriage of accessory virulence-related factors (data not shown). Two other isolates (R250 and R436) were O33:H6 but had different intimin types. Ten isolates were O-serogroups that were classified as nontypable because they did not react with any of the available O-typing sera (O1-O181), and 2 isolates could not be serotyped because they were rough. Only 1 isolate (R404) belonged to an E. coli serotype, O128:H2, that is commonly associated with EPEC (4).

During the second period of the study, when E. coli was not sought, putative pathogens were identified in 99 (58.6%) of 169 children; rotavirus was the most frequent (33.7%), followed by Campylobacter (11.8%), adenovirus (7.7%), Salmonella (5.3%), Giardia (1.8%), and Cryptosporidium (0.6%) spp. Four patients were infected with >1 pathogen: 3 concurrently infected with rotavirus and adenovirus and 1 with adenovirus and Salmonella sp. Shigella and Yersinia spp. were not identified during either period of the study. The frequency of rotavirus infection during the second phase of the study was significantly greater than during the first phase (odds ratio [OR] 13.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.08 33.91, p<[10.sup.-6], 2-tailed Fisher exact test), confirming the well-known association of rotavirus with winter diarrhea (12). The frequency of patients in whom no pathogens were identified was not significantly different between the 2 study periods (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.46-1.18, p>0.2, 2-tailed Fisher exact test), despite the omission of tests for diarrheogenic E. coli during the second period. This finding suggests that E. coli did not account for a large number of cases during the second period of the study and accords with our previous observations that diarrhea due to E. coli is relatively less frequent during winter (9,19).

Comparison of Clinical and Laboratory Findings

The clinical and laboratory features of patients infected with different pathogens were compared (Table 4). Patients infected with >1 pathogen were excluded from this analysis, as were those infected with Giardia or Cryptosporidium spp. or diarrheogenic E. coli other than EPEC because their numbers were too small for the results to be meaningful. For this analysis, only those patients in whom no pathogens were identified from the first study period were considered because of the possibility that some of those studied during the second period were infected with diarrheogenic E. coli.

Patients infected with EPEC were of a similar age (median 16.9 months) to those from whom no pathogens were isolated (median age 11.6 months). Of the various groups of patients defined according to the cause of diarrhea, only those infected with Campylobacter spp. (median age 34.2 months) differed significantly in age from those with EPEC (p = 0.0002, Mann-Whitney U test). Eighteen (72%) of 25 children monoinfected with EPEC were boys compared with 20 (44%) of 46 children in whom no pathogens were identified (OR = 3.34, 95% Cl 1.17-9.55, p = 0.03, 2-tailed Fisher exact test), and with 49 (47%) of 104 children enrolled in phase 1 of the study who were not infected with EPEC (OR = 2.89, 95% CI 1.11 7.5, p = 0.03).

Patients infected with rotavirus or adenovirus were significantly more likely to have a history of vomiting than those with no pathogen identified or those infected with EPEC, Salmonella, or Campylobacter spp. The frequency of vomiting in patients infected with EPEC and in those with no pathogen identified was similar. Abdominal pain was reported significantly more frequently in patients infected with Campylobacter spp. than in those infected with EPEC (p = 0.007, 2-tailed Fisher exact test), adenovirus (p = 0.0005), rotavirus (p = 0.0005), or those in whom no pathogen was detected (p = 0.003).

The duration of diarrhea was significantly longer in patients with EPEC than in those infected with adenovirus (p = 0.002, 2-tailed Student t test), rotavirus (p = 0.0003), Campylobacter (p = 0.0003), Salmonella (p = 0.02), and those without an identifiable pathogen (p = 0.02). Moreover, persistent diarrhea (defined as diarrhea lasting >14 days) was significantly more common in patients infected with atypical EPEC than in those infected with adenovirus, rotavirus, Campylobacter, Salmonella, and those with no pathogen identified (Table 4). Persistent diarrhea also developed in 4 (36%) of 11 patients infected with Giardia sp. The frequency of persistent diarrhea associated with Giardia was significantly greater than that attributable to adenovirus (p = 0.03), rotavirus (p = 0.01), and Camplyobacter, but not Salmonella or atypical EPEC (p>0.1, 2-tailed Fisher exact test).

Fever was significantly more common in patients infected with rotavirus or Salmonella than in those infected with EPEC, adenovirus, or Campylobacter, and those with no pathogen identified. Dehydration of [greater than or equal to] 5% occurred significantly more often in patients infected with rotavirus than in those infected with EPEC, adenovirus, Campylobacter, Salmonella, and those without an identifiable pathogen.

The disease severity score, determined according to the criteria of Ruuska and Vesikari (10), was highest in patients infected with rotavirus followed by Salmonella sp. The mean severity scores in patients infected with EPEC, adenovirus, and Campylobacter sp. and those in whom no pathogen was found were similar. Stools from patients infected with Campylobacter or Salmonella spp. were more likely to contain frank blood, although the differences between patients infected with different etiologic agents were not significant (p>0.05, 2-tailed Fisher exact test). Erythrocytes were more commonly detected on microscopic examination in patients infected with Campylobacter or Salmonella spp. than in those infected with EPEC, adenovirus, rotavirus, or no identifiable pathogen, but the differences were significant with respect to Campylobacter spp. only. Fecal leukocytes were present significantly more often in patients infected with Campylobacter or Salmonella spp. than in those infected with EPEC, adenovirus, rotavirus, or those with no identifiable pathogen.

Discussion

The principal aims of this study were to compare the frequency of atypical EPEC with frequencies of established enteropathogens in children attending hospital with diarrhea and to determine the clinical and laboratory features associated with each pathogen. During the first part of the study (when pathogenic E. coli was sought), atypical EPEC was the predominant pathogen identified; it was found in 31% of 134 children compared with 10% for adenovirus, 10% for Salmonella sp., 9% for Campylobacter sp., and 4% for rotavirus. In the second period of the study, when EPEC was not sought, rotavirus predominated. In agreement with our findings from a community-based study in Melbourne and reports from investigators in Brazil, Norway, and elsewhere (9,20,21), the atypical EPEC strains obtained in this study were highly heterogeneous in terms of O:H serotype and intimin type, which indicates that the high frequency of atypical EPEC was not due to an outbreak caused by a limited number of strains. Also in agreement with our previous study, we observed that serotypes of EPEC associated with diarrhea differed from those listed by the World Health Organization as being characteristic of EPEC (9).

To determine whether atypical EPEC is a cause of diarrhea, we compared the clinical and laboratory findings of children who were infected with these bacteria with those who were infected with well-established pathogens and those in whom no pathogens were identified. The hypothesis underlying this investigation was that if atypical EPEC is not a pathogen, the symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings in patients infected with these bacteria would be the same as those in patients in whom no pathogens were found. The results showed that diarrhea attributable to atypical EPEC was significantly more common in boys and that it persisted significantly longer than diarrhea in patients without an identifiable pathogen or in those infected with adenovirus, rotavirus, Campylobacter spp., or Salmonella sp. This study also showed that infection with atypical EPEC generally occurred in children <2 years of age, with 72% <24 months of age compared with 55% for the first study group as a whole (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.17-7.85, p = 0.03, 2-tailed Fisher exact test). Infection with EPEC was associated with vomiting in [approximately equal to] 50% of patients, was generally not accompanied by fever, abdominal pain, or dehydration, and was not characterized by fecal blood or leukocytes, indicating that it was not inflammatory in nature. The reason for the higher frequency of atypical EPEC in boys is not known but confirms our unpublished observations from a community-based study, in which 55 isolates were obtained from 338 male patients, and 34 were obtained from 358 female patients (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.17-2.92, p = 0.009, 2-tailed Fisher exact test).

The validity of the clinical and laboratory assessments performed in this study was indicated by the confirmation of the well-known associations of specific pathogens with particular parameters: younger age of children infected with EPEC and viruses than those infected with Campylobacter or Salmonella spp.; rotavirus and Salmonella infections with fever; rotavirus with dehydration and an overall greater severity of disease; Campylobacter sp. with fecal blood; and Campylobacter and Salmonella spp. with fecal leukocytes (22).

Persistent diarrhea (lasting more then 14 days) eventually develops in a substantial proportion of children with acute infectious gastroenteritis and may become chronic, leading to malabsorption, failure to thrive, and malnutrition (23). A wide range of infectious agents has been implicated in the cause of persistent diarrhea, including viruses, in particular rotavirus; protozoa, such as Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp., and bacteria, including E. coli (23,24). In most cases, however, laboratory investigation of children with persistent diarrhea fails to yield an identifiable cause. The findings of this study suggest that a number of these cases may be caused by infection with atypical EPEC, which is seldom sought in these patients.

Despite the persuasive evidence of a volunteer study and reports of outbreaks of diarrhea attributed to atypical EPEC (25,26), the role of atypical EPEC in disease is controversial. In several reports, however, from countries as diverse as Iran, Norway, Peru, Poland, South Africa, the United States, and the United Kingdom (20,27-32), as well as Australia (9,33), atypical EPEC strains have been identified in children with acute diarrheal disease. Atypical EPEC has also previously been reported in association with prolonged diarrhea (34). For example, Hill et al. (35) reported that of 26 children infected with EPEC requiring hospital admission for acute diarrhea, life-threatening, chronic symptoms developed in 6 (23%). Five of these 6 children were infected with EPEC of serogroups O114 or O128, which frequently do not produce Bfp (14,36). Notwithstanding these previous reports, however, the current study is the first to characterize the illness caused by atypical EPEC in a systematic way and to compare the features of atypical EPEC infection with those of other etiologic agents of diarrhea.

The reasons why persistent diarrhea develops more frequently in children infected with atypical EPEC than in those infected with adenovirus, rotavirus, Campylobacter or Salmonella spp. are not known. In a recent study, Mellmann et al. (37) found that only 12 (<9%) of 137 patients who were infected with eae-positive EHEC strains when investigated within 14 days of the onset of diarrhea remained culture-positive when retested 3-16 days later, compared with all 5 patients who were initially infected with eae-positive, stx-negative E. coli (i.e., atypical EPEC) (OR 110.4, 95% CI 5.8-2117.6, p<0.0001, 2-tailed Fisher exact test). These findings indicate that atypical EPEC may have an innate propensity to persist longer in the intestine than varieties of E. coli which cause diarrhea that is more transient in nature. EPEC adheres tightly to epithelial cells and disrupts normal cellular processes (38), and evidence suggests that atypical EPEC may retard apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells (39), possibly because of the lack of Bfp (40). These features may favor prolonged intestinal colonization by atypical EPEC compared with other intestinal pathogens. Although disease due to atypical EPEC was mild and generally not associated with dehydration, its importance lies in its association with prolonged diarrhea, a major contributor to childhood illness, especially in developing countries. Our findings also suggest that interventions targeted towards atypical EPEC may be beneficial in managing children with prolonged diarrhea.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to to K.A. Bettelheim and the staff of the diagnostic microbiology and virology laboratories at the Royal Children's Hospital for their assistance.

This study was supported by grants to R.R.B. from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and the Murdoch Children's Research Institute.

Dr Nguyen is head of pediatric infectious diseases at An Giang General Hospital in Long Xuyen City, An Giang, Vietnam. His major research interests are viral infections and the development of methods for the rapid diagnosis of infectious diseases.

References

(1.) Nataro JP, Kaper JB. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:142-201.

(2.) Robins-Browne RM, Hartland EL. Escherichia coli as a cause of diarrhea. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17:467-75.

(3.) Robins-Browne RM. Traditional enteropathogenic Escherichia coli of infantile diarrhea. Rev Infect Dis. 1987;9:28-53.

(4.) Trabulsi LR, Keller R, Gomes TAT. Typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:508-3.

(5.) Bieber D, Ramer SW, Wu CY, Murray WJ, Tobe T, Fernandez R, et al. Type IV pili, transient bacterial aggregates, and virulence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science. 1998;280:2114-8.

(6.) Frankel G, Phillips AD, Rosenshine I, Dougan G, Kaper JB, Knutton S. Enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli: more subversive elements. Mol Microbiol. 1998;30:911-21.

(7.) Gomez-Duarte OG, Kaper JB. A plasmid-encoded regulatory region activates chromosomal eaeA expression in enteropathogenic Escherichia coll. Infect Immun. 1995;63:1767-76.

(8.) Hellard ME, Sinclair MI, Forbes AB, Fairley CK. A randomized, blinded, controlled trial investigating the gastrointestinal health effects of drinking water quality. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 ; 109:773-8.

(9.) Robins-Browne RM, Bordun A-M, Tauschek M, Bennett-Wood V, Russell J, Oppedisano F, et al. Atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: a leading cause of community-acquired gastroenteritis in Melbourne, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004; 10:1797-805.

(10.) Ruuska T, Vesikari T. Rotavirns disease in Finnish children: use of numerical scores for clinical severity of diarrhoeal episodes. Scand J Infect Dis. 1990;22:259-67.

(11.) Garcia LS. Diagnostic medical parasitology, 4th ed. Washington: ASM Press; 2001.

(12.) Barnes GL, Uren E, Stevens KB, Bishop RF. Etiology of acute gastroenteritis in hospitalized children in Melbourne, Australia, from April 1980 to March 1993. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:133-8.

(13.) Vial P, Robins-Browne R, Lior H, Prado V, Kaper JB, Nataro JP, et al. Characterization of enteroadherent-aggregative Escherichia coli, a putative agent of diarrheal disease. J infect Dis. 1988; 158:70-9.

(14.) Levine MM, Nataro JP, Karch H, Baldini MM, Kaper JB, Black RE, et al. The diarrheal response of humans to some classic serotypes of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli is dependent on a plasmid encoding an enteroadhesiveness factor. J infect Dis. 1985;152:550-9.

(15.) Wood PK, Morris JG Jr, Small PLC, Sethabutr O, Toledo MRF, Trabulsi L, et al. Comparison of DNA probes and the Sereny test for identification of invasive Shigella and Escherichia coli strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;24:498-500.

(16.) Satterwhite TK, Evans DG, DuPont HL, Evans DJ Jr. Role of Escherichia coli colonization factor antigen in acute diarrhoea. Lancet. 1978;ii(8082):181-4.

(17.) Perna NT, Plunkett G, Burland V, Mau B, Glasner JD, Rose DJ, et al. Genome sequence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O 157:H7. Nature. 2001 ;409:529-33.

(18.) Bettelheim KA, Thompson CJ. New method of serotyping Escherichia coli: implementation and verification. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:781-6.

(19.) Robins-Browne RM. Seasonal and racial incidence of infantile gastroenteritis in South Africa. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;119:350-5.

(20.) Afset JE, Bergh K, Bevanger L. High prevalence of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) in Norwegian children with diarrhoea. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52:1015-9.

(21.) Vieira MA, Andrade JR, Trabulsi LR, Rosa AC, Dias AM, Ramos SR, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of Escherichia coli strains of non-enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) serogroups that carry EAE and lack the EPEC adherence factor and Shiga toxin DNA probe sequences. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:762-72.

(22.) Blaser MJ, Smith PD, Ravdin JI, Greenberg HB, Guerrant RL. Infections of the gastrointestinal tract. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 2002.

(23.) Walker-Smith JA. Post-infective diarrhoea. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2001;14:567-71.

(24.) Nataro JP, Sears CL. Infectious causes of persistent diarrhea. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20:195-6.

(25.) Viljanen MK, Peltola T, Junnila SY, Olkkonen L, Jarvinen H, Kuistila M, et al. Outbreak of diarrhoea due to Escherichia coli O111:B4 in schoolchildren and adults: association of Vi antigen-like reactivity. Lancet. 1990;336:831-4.

(26.) Yatsuyanagi J, Saito S, Miyajima Y, Amano K, Enomoto K. Characterization of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains harboring the astA gene that were associated with a waterborne outbreak of diarrhea in Japan. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:2033-9.

(27.) Bokete TN, Whittam TS, Wilson RA, Clausen CR, O'Callahan CM, Moseley SL, et al. Genetic and phenotypic analysis of Escherichia coli with enteropathogenic characteristics isolated from Seattle children. J infect Dis. 1997;175:1382-9.

(28.) Bouzari S, Jafari MN, Shokouhi F, Parsi M, Jafari A. Virulence-related DNA sequences and adherence patterns in strains of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000; 185:89-93.

(29.) Galane PM, Le Roux M. Molecular epidemiology of Escherichia coli isolated from young South African children with diarrhoeal diseases. J Health Popul Nutr. 2001;19:31-8.

(30.) Knutton S, Shaw R, Phillips AD, Smith HR, Willshaw GA, Watson P, et al. Phenotypic and genetic analysis of diarrhea-associated Escherichia coli isolated from children in the United Kingdom. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001 ;33:32-40.

(31.) Nataro JP, Baldini MM, Kaper JB, Black RE, Bravo N, Levine MM. Detection of an adherence factor of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli with a DNA probe. J Infect Dis. 1985;152:560-5.

(32.) Paciorek J. Virulence properties of Escherichia coli faecal strains isolated in Poland from healthy children and strains belonging to serogroups O18, 026, 044, 086, O126 and O127 isolated from children with diarrhoea. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51:548-56.

(33.) Kukurnzovic R, Robins-Browne RM, Anstey NM, Brewster DR. Enteric pathogens, intestinal permeability and nitric oxide production in acute gastroenteritis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002;21:730-9.

(34.) Afset JE, Bevanger L, Romundstad P, Bergh K. Association of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) with prolonged diarrhoea. J Med Microbiol. 2004;53:1137-44.

(35.) Hill SM, Phillips AD, Walker-Smith JA. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and life threatening chronic diarrhoea. Gut. 1991;32:154-8.

(36.) Scotland SM, Smith HR, Rowe B. Escherichia coli O128 strains from infants with diarrhea commonly show localized adhesion and positivity in the fluorescent-actin staining test but do not hybridize with an enteropathogenic E. coli probe. Infect Immun. 1991 ;59:1569-71.

(37.) Mellmann A, Bielaszewska M, Zimmerhack1 LB, Prager R, Harmsen D, Tschape H, et al. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in human infection: in vivo evolution of a bacterial pathogen. Clin infect Dis. 2005;41:785-92.

(38.) Chen HD, Frankel G. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: unravelling pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005;29:83-98.

(39.) Heczko U, Carthy CM, O'Brien BA, Finlay BB. Decreased apoptosis in the ileum and ileal Peyer's patches: a feature after infection with rabbit enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O103. Infect Immun. 2001;69:4580-9.

(40.) Melo AR, Lasunskaia EB, de Almeida CM, Schriefer A, Kipnis TL, as da SW. Expression of the virulence factor, BfpA, by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli is essential for apoptosis signalling but not for NF-kappaB activation in host cells. Scand J Immunol. 2005;61:511-9.

Rang N. Nguyen, * (1) Louise S. Taylor, * ([dagger]) Marija Tauschek,* ([dagger]) and Roy M. Robins-Browne * ([dagger])

* University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; and ([dagger]) Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (1) Current affiliation: An Giang General Hospital, Long Xuyen City, An Giang, Vietnam

Address for correspondence: R.M. Robins-Browne, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia; fax: [phone]; email: r.browne@ unimelb.edu.au

Table 1. Classification of pathogenic Escherichia coli according to
amplicon(s) generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for
virulence-associated determinants

                                   Gene or virulence-associated
                                            determinant *

Interpretation ([dagger])      pCVD432    aggA    bfpA    eae    ipaC

EAEC ([double dagger])            +        +       -       -      -
Typical EPEC                      -        -       +       +      -
Atypical EPEC                     -        -       -       +      -
EIEC                              -        -       -       -      +
ETEC ([double dagger])            -        -       -       -      -
EHEC ([section])                  -        -       -       +      -
STEC not EHEC ([paragraph])       -        -       -       -      -

                                   Gene or virulence-associated
                                          determinant *

Interpretation ([dagger])      stlA    ItA    ehxA    stx1    stx2

EAEC ([double dagger])          -       -      -       -       -
Typical EPEC                    -       -      -       -       -
Atypical EPEC                   -       -      -       -       -
EIEC                            -       -      -       -       -
ETEC ([double dagger])          +       +      -       -       -
EHEC ([section])                -       -      +       +       +
STEC not EHEC ([paragraph])     -       -      -       +       +

                               Control strain
Interpretation ([dagger])      (reference)

EAEC ([double dagger])            O42 (13)
Typical EPEC                   E2348/69 (14)
Atypical EPEC                   E128012 (14)
EIEC                             223/83 (15)
ETEC ([double dagger])           H10407 (16)
EHEC ([section])                 EDL933 (17)
STEC not EHEC ([paragraph])

* Factors specified by virulence genes: aggA, aggregative fimbria,
AAF/I; bfpA, bundle-forming pilus; eae, intimin; ipaC, invasion plasmid
antigen; stlA, heat-stable enterotoxin; ItA, heat-labile enterotoxin;
ehxA, EHEC hemolysin; stx, Shiga toxin.

([dagger]) EAEC, enteroaggregative E. coli; EPEC, enteropathogenic E.
coli; EIEC, enteroinvasive E. coli; ETEC, enterotoxigenic E. coli;
STEC, Shiga toxin-producing E. coli; EHEC, enterohemorrhagic E. coli.

([double dagger]) Either positive by polymerase chain reaction.

([section]) Either eae or ehxA, and either stx1 or stx2 positive.

([section]) Either stx1 or stx2 positive.

([paragraph]) Either stx1 or stx2 positive.

Table 2. Frequency of diarrhea-associated pathogens detected during
the course of this study

                      1st period (Mar 1-May    2nd period (May 16-Aug
Pathogen                15), n = 134 (%)          31), n = 169 (%)

Diarrhepgenic
  Escherichia coli
  (all)                     42 (31.3)                 Not done
Campylobacter spp.          12 (9.0)                 20 (11.8)
Salmonella spp.             14 (10.4)                 9 (5.3)
Adenovirus                  14 (10.4)                13 (7.7)
Rotavirus                    5 (3.7)                 57 (33.7)
Giardia sp.                  8 (6.0)                  3 (1.8)
Crytosporidium sp.           2 (1.5)                  1 (0.6)
>1 pathogen                  9 (6.7)                  4 (2.4)
No pathogens
  identified                46 (34.3)                70 (41.4)

Table 3. Characteristics of atypical EPEC identified during this
study *

Strain no.      Serotype       Intimin type

R41             ONT:H34          [alpha]2
R69                NT             [theta]
R89             O153:H7           [beta]
R104            O153:H7           [beta]
R151            ONT:H34          [alpha]2
R154             O71:H6          [alpha]1
R175            O128:H21          [kappa]
R176             ONT:H8           [iota]
R182             OR:H40           [theta]
R215            O117:H2       [epsilon]/[eta]
R218             ONT:R           [alpha]2
R219            O51:H49          [alpha]1
R227          O170/172:H49        [theta]
R228             O88:H-           [kappa]
R249            O145:H34          [iota]
R250             O33:H6           [zeta]
R261             O2:H45           [kappa]
R278            ONT:H19          [upsilon]
R281            O49:H10           [kappa]
R380            ONT:H31           [zeta]
R392             ONT:H6          [alpha]2
R394           O5/71:H31          [theta]
R396             O98:H8           [iota]
R404            O128:H2           [beta]
R420            ONT:H21           [theta]
R436             O33:H6           [beta]
R446            ONT:H34          [alpha]2
R447            O28:H45           [zeta]
R457             ONT:H-           [beta]

* EPEC, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli; H-, nonmotile; NT,
nontypable (O1-O181; 141-1456); R, rough

Table 4. Association between presumed etiologic agent and clinical and
laboratory findings in children with diarrhea *

                                          Presumed etiologic agent

Clinical or laboratory                              EPEC,
parameter                                          n = 25

Age in months, median                         16.9 (11.4-28.2)
(interquartile range)
Sex, no. (% male)                           18 (72) ([paragraph])
Vomiting, no. (%)                                  11 (44)
Abdominal pain, no. (%)                            5 (20)
Days with diarrhea,                     12.1 (7.5-16.7) ([paragraph])
mean (95% CI)
Diarrhea >14 days,                          12 (48) ([paragraph])
no. (%)
Temperature [greater than or equal                 6 (24)
to] 38[degrees]C, no. (%)
Dehydration [greater than or equal                  1 (4)
to] 5%, no. (%)
Severity score, mean                           9.0 (7.7-10.3)
(95% CI)
Fecal blood
  Macroscopic, no. (%)                                0
  Microscopic only, no. (%)                        4 (16)
  Fecal leukocvtes. no. (%)                        5 (20)

                                          Presumed etiologic agent

Clinical or laboratory                          Adenovirus,
parameter                                          n = 22

Age in months, median                     9.5 (4.4-19.5) ([dagger])
(interquartile range)
Sex, no. (% male)                                  14 (64)
Vomiting, no. (%)                     17 (77) ([dagger]) ([paragraph])
Abdominal pain, no. (%)                    2 (9) ([double dagger])
Days with diarrhea,                    4.9 (3.6-6.2) ([double dagger])
mean (95% CI)
Diarrhea >14 days,                         1 (5) ([double dagger])
no. (%)
Temperature [greater than or equal                  2 (9)
to] 38[degrees]C, no. (%)
Dehydration [greater than or equal                  2 (9)
to] 5%, no. (%)
Severity score, mean                            8.6 (7.5-9.7)
(95% CI)
Fecal blood
  Macroscopic, no. (%)                                0
  Microscopic only, no. (%)                         2 (9)
  Fecal leukocvtes. no. (%)                        4 (18)

                                          Presumed etiologic agent

Clinical or laboratory                           Rotavirus,
parameter                                          n = 55

Age in months, median                          15.2 (9.4-28.0)
(interquartile range)
Sex, no. (% male)                                  30 (55)
Vomiting, no. (%)                         49 (89) ([double dagger])
                                                 ([section])
Abdominal pain, no. (%)                            10 (18)
Days with diarrhea,                    6.0 (4.9-7.1) ([double dagger])
mean (95% CI)
Diarrhea >14 days,                         3 (5) ([double dagger])
no. (%)                                         ([paragraph])
Temperature [greater than or equal    30 (55) ([dagger]) ([paragraph])
to] 38[degrees]C, no. (%)
Dehydration [greater than or equal        35 (64) ([double dagger])
to] 5%, no. (%)                                  ([section])
Severity score, mean                                13.5
(95% CI)                                (12.6-14.4) ([double dagger])
                                                 ([section])
Fecal blood
  Macroscopic, no. (%)                                0
  Microscopic only, no. (%)                         1 (2)
  Fecal leukocvtes. no. (%)                        10 (18)

                                          Presumed etiologic agent

Clinical or laboratory                         Campylobacter,
parameter                                          n = 30

Age in months, median                               34.2
(interquartile range)                   (26.9-98.1) ([double dagger])
                                                 ([section])
Sex, no. (% male)                                  17 (57)
Vomiting, no. (%)                                  13 (43)
Abdominal pain, no. (%)                        17 (57) (#) **
Days with diarrhea,                    4.9 (3.9-5.9) ([double dagger])
mean (95% CI)
Diarrhea >14 days,                         1 (3) ([double dagger])
no. (%)
Temperature [greater than or equal                 7 (23)
to] 38[degrees]C, no. (%)
Dehydration [greater than or equal                  2 (7)
to] 5%, no. (%)
Severity score, mean                            8.4 (7.5-9.3)
(95% CI)
Fecal blood
  Macroscopic, no. (%)                             4 (13)
  Microscopic only, no. (%)           17 (57) ([paragraph]) ([section])
  Fecal leukocvtes. no. (%)               23 (77) ([double dagger])
                                                 ([section])

                                          Presumed etiologic agent

Clinical or laboratory                           Salmonella,
parameter                                          n = 22

Age in months, median                   29.8 (9.3-90.9) ([paragraph])
(interquartile range)
Sex, no. (% male)                                  10 (46)
Vomiting, no. (%)                                  7 (32)
Abdominal pain, no. (%)                            10 (45)
Days with diarrhea,                       6.5 (4.2-8.6) ([dagger])
mean (95% CI)
Diarrhea >14 days,                                2 (9) (#)
no. (%)
Temperature [greater than or equal        17 (77) ([double dagger])
to] 38[degrees]C, no. (%)                        ([section])
Dehydration [greater than or equal            6 (27) ([dagger])
to] 5%, no. (%)
Severity score, mean                                11.3
(95% CI)                                      (9.8-12.8) (#) **
Fecal blood
  Macroscopic, no. (%)                             3 (14)
  Microscopic only, no. (%)                        9 (41)
  Fecal leukocvtes. no. (%)               14 (64) ([paragraph]) (#)

Clinical or laboratory                              NPI,
parameter                                          n = 46

Age in months, median                            11.6 (3.1-
(interquartile range)                               52.7)
Sex, no. (% male)                            20 (44) ([dagger])
Vomiting, no. (%)                                  23 (50)
Abdominal pain, no. (%)                          10 (22) **
Days with diarrhea,                       6.3 (3.5-9.0) ([dagger])
mean (95% CI)
Diarrhea >14 days,                            9 (20) ([dagger])
no. (%)
Temperature [greater than or equal                 13 (28)
to] 38[degrees]C, no. (%)
Dehydration [greater than or equal                 6 (13)
to] 5%, no. (%)
Severity score, mean                            8.3 (7.4-9.2)
(95% CI)
Fecal blood
  Macroscopic, no. (%)                              1 (2)
  Microscopic only, no. (%)                        9 (20)
  Fecal leukocvtes. no. (%)                        10 (22)

* EPEC, Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli; NPI, no pathogen identified;
CI, confidence interval.

([dagger]) Significantly different from EPEC (Mann-Whitney U test,
Fisher exact test, or Student t-test, 2-tailed), p<0.05, >0.01.

([double dagger]) Significantly different from EPEC (Mann-Whitney U
test, Fisher exact test, or Student t test, 2-tailed), p<0.001.

([section]) Significantly different from NPI (Mann-Whitney U test,
Fisher exact test, or Student t test, 2-tailed), p<0.001.

([paragraph]) Significantly different from NPI (Mann-Whitney U test,
Fisher exact test, or Student t test, 2-tailed), p<0.05, >0.01.

(#) Significantly different from EPEC (Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher
exact test, or Student Nest, 2-tailed), p<0.01, >0.001.

** Significantly different from NPI (Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher
exact test, or Student t test, 2 tailed, p<0.01, >0.001.