Associations of uric acid with polymorphisms in the [delta]-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase, vitamin D receptor, and nitric oxide synthase genes in Korean lead workers.

Recent research suggests that uric acid may be nephrotoxic at lower levels than previously recognized and that it may be one mechanism for lead-related nephrotoxicity. Therefore, in understanding mechanisms for lead-related nephrotoxicity, it would be of value to determine whether genetic polymorphisms that are associated with renal outcomes in lead workers and/or modify associations between lead dose and renal function are also associated with uric acid and/or modify associations between lead dose and uric acid. We analyzed data on three such genetic polymorphisms: [delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), and the vitamin D receptor (VDR). Mean ([+ or -] SD) tibia, blood, and dimercaptosuccinic acid--chelatable lead levels were 37.2 [+ or -]40.4 [micro]g/g bone mineral, 32.0[+ or -] 15.0 g/dL, and 0.77 [+ or -] 0.86 [micro]g/mg creatinine, respectively, in 798 current and former lead workers. Participants with the eNOS Asp allele had lower mean serum uric acid compared with those with the Glu/Glu genotype. Among older workers (age [greater than or equal to] median of 40.6 years), ALAD genotype modified associations between lead dose and uric acid levels. Higher lead dose was significantly associated with higher uric acid in workers with the ALADI-1 genotype; associations were in the opposite direction in participants with the variant ALAD1-2 genotype. In contrast, higher tibia lead was associated with higher uric acid in those with the variant VDR B allele; however, modification was dependent on participants with the bb genotype and high tibia lead levels. We condude that genetic polymorphisms may modify uric acid mediation of lead-related adverse renal effects. Key words: [delta]-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, genetic susceptibility factors, kidney function, lead exposure, uric acid, vitamin D receptor. Environ Health Perspect 113:1509-1515 (2005). doi:10.1289/ehp.7927 available via http://dx.doi.org/[Online 27 June 2005]

**********

Increasing evidence suggests that lead exposure may contribute to decreased renal function (Kim et al. 1996; Lin et al. 1999, 2003; Muntner et al. 2003; Payton et al. 1994; Staessen et al. 1992; Yu et al. 2004) and increased uric acid levels (Lin et al. 2002, 2001; Shadick et al. 2000) at lower doses than previously recognized, particularly in susceptible populations. Similarly, an increasing body of literature suggests that uric acid may be nephrotoxic at lower levels than currently appreciated (Johnson et al. 2003). In previous analyses in the same population of lead workers reported here, we found associations between lead dose and increased uric acid in older workers and evidence that uric acid may mediate some lead-related adverse renal effects (Weaver et al. 2005). Therefore, to understand the mechanisms of lead-related nephrotoxicity, it would be helpful to determine whether genetic polymorphisms that are associated with renal outcomes in lead workers and/or modify associations between lead dose and renal function are also associated with uric acid and/or modify associations between lead dose and uric acid. In this study we evaluated three such genetic polymorphisms: [delta]-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD), the BsmI polymorphism of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene, and the Glu298Asp polymorphism of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene. We examined associations of these polymorphisms and their effect modification on associations of three lead dose biomarkers in models of uric acid in a cross-sectional analysis of data from the first of three evaluations of 798 current and former Korean lead workers in a longitudinal study of the adverse health effects of inorganic lead exposure.

Materials and Methods

Study design and population. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of first evaluation data from 798 current and former lead workers enrolled in a longitudinal study of the adverse health effects of inorganic lead exposure. All participants provided written, informed consent. The study protocol was approved by institutional review boards at the SoonChunHyang University and the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health. Participation in the study was voluntary, and workers were paid approximately $30 for their time and effort. As previously described (Schwartz et al. 2001; Weaver et al. 2003a), workers were recruited from 26 different facilities including lead battery, lead oxide, lead crystal, and radiator manufactures and secondary lead smelting. No medical exclusionary criteria (e.g., blood pressure, renal disease) were applied. Study participants were not currently occupationally exposed to other known renal toxicants.

Data collection. Data collection was completed either at the Institute of Industrial Medicine of the SoonChunHyang University in Chonan or at the study plants, using previously reported methods (Schwartz et al. 2001 ; Weaver et al. 2003a). Data and biologic specimens collected included a standardized questionnaire on demographics and medical and occupational history; blood pressure; height and weight measurement; a blood specimen [for blood lead, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, uric acid, and genotyping]; a spot urine sample [for N-acetyl-[beta]-glucosaminidase (NAG), retinol-binding protein (RBP), and creatinine]; and tibia lead concentration. A 4-hr urine collection after oral administration of 10 mg/kg dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) was also obtained to measure DMSA-chelatable lead and creatinine clearance (787 participants completed this collection).

Laboratory methods. We measured lead biomarkers and renal outcomes using previously reported methods (Schwartz et al. 2001; Weaver et al. 2003a). In brief, blood lead was measured (Fernandez 1975) with a Zeeman background-corrected atomic absorption spectrophotometer (model 8100; Hitachi Ltd. Instruments, Tokyo, Japan) at the Institute of Industrial Medicine, a certified reference laboratory for lead in Korea. Tibia lead was assessed via a 30-min measurement of the left midtibia diaphysis using (109)Cd to fluoresce the K-shell X-rays of lead. The lead X-rays were recorded with a radiation detector and then quantified and compared with calibration data to estimate the concentration of lead in bone (Todd and Chettle 1994; Todd and McNeill 1993). All point estimates, including negative values, were retained in the statistical analyses, to minimize bias and to avoid censoring of data (Kim et al. 1995). Urine lead levels in the 4-hr collection were measured at the Wadsworth Center of the New York State Department of Health (Albany, NY, USA) by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry with Zeeman background correction (model 4100ZL; PerkinElmer, Norwalk, CT, USA) (Parsons and Slavin 1999).

We measured BUN, serum creatinine, and uric acid using an automatic chemical analyzer (model TBA 40FR biochemical analyzer; Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan). Urine creatinine was measured with the Sigma kit (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO, USA). Measured creatinine clearance was defined as [(urinary creatinine in milligrams per deciliter x urine volume in milliliters) / serum creatinine in milligrams per deciliter] / collection time in minutes. Calculated creatinine clearance was obtained from the Cockcroft-Gault equation (Cockcroft and Gault 1976). We measured NAG using the PPR NAG test kit (PPR Diagnostics, Ltd., London, UK), and RBP was measured using a modification of the method of Topping et al. (1986).

We isolated DNA for genotyping from whole blood samples using the QIAamp blood kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The ALAD polymorphism assayed [delta]-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase NCBI accession no. AY319481) results in two alleles: ALAD1 and the variant, ALAD2, which has a G-to-C transversion at codon 177. The protocol for ALAD genotyping involved an initial amplification that generated a 916 bp fragment (Schwartz et al. 1995; Wetmur et al. 1991; Ziemsen et al. 1986). A second amplification, using a pair of nested primers (kindly provided by J. Wetmur), generated an 887 bp fragment. The amplified fragment was cleaved at the diagnostic Msp1 site on the ALAD2 allele. The Glu298Asp polymorphism of the eNOSgene (endothelial nitric oxidase synthase; NCBI accession no. X76307) involves a G-to-T transversion at nucleotide position 894 within exon 7, which results in substitution of aspartic acid for glutamic acid at codon 298; the variant allele is referred to as the Asp or Tallele. Genotype was determined by a modification of the assay of Hibi et al. (1998) as previously described (Weaver et al. 2003b). The VDR BsmI polymorphic site in intron 8 [vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin [D.sub.3]) receptor; NCBI accession no. AY342401] consists of the common allele, denoted b, and a variant, denoted B, in which the BsmI restriction enzyme site is absent. Amplification used primers originating in exon 7 and intron 8 as previously published (Schwartz et al. 2000b).

Statistical analysis. The primary goals of our analysis were to examine associations of ALAD, VDR, and eNOS genotype with uric acid in lead workers while controlling for other covariates and to evaluate whether ALAD, VDR, and eNOS genotypes modified associations between the lead dose biomarkers (tibia lead, blood lead, DMSA-chelatable lead) and uric acid while controlling for other covariates. Statistical analysis was completed using SAS software, version 8.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Initially, we examined variable distributions. The distributions of NAG and RBP showed departures from normality and were thus In-transformed; the adequacy of this transformation was subsequently confirmed by examination of residuals from the final regression models. Linear regression modeling with a dichotomous genotype variable was used to compare uric acid by genotype, while controlling for the same covariates used in the interaction models. For ALAD, participants with the ALAD1-2 genotype were compared with the reference group of participants with ALAD1-1 genotype. Because of small numbers, all analyses combined homozygous and heterozygous variant genotype carriers for VDR (BB and Bb) and eNOS (Glu/Asp and Asp/Asp). Linear regression modeling with genotype and lead variable cross-product terms was used to evaluate effect modification by genotype on associations between lead biomarkers and uric acid. Models with tibia lead were repeated after removal of data from participants with the common allele whose tibia lead levels were higher than the range in those with the variant allele. Covariate selection for final regression models used a priori variables [age, sex, body mass index (BMI; defined as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters)] in modeling that included other biologically relevant variables in separate models, as previously described (Weaver et al. 2005). Covariates retained included age, sex, BMI, categorical alcohol consumption (current, former, never), and, when noted in specific models, systolic blood pressure and serum creatinine. Models are presented with and without these last two variables because their interrelatedness with lead dose and uric acid suggests that neither modeling approach is entirely adequate (Weaver et al. 2005). Continuous independent variables were centered at the mean.

Because effect modification by age on associations between lead biomarkers and uric acid was observed in this population (Weaver et al. 2005), we dichotomized the population by median age and repeated both types of models described above (main effect and interaction) to evaluate associations of genotype in models of uric acid and effect modification by genotype on associations between lead biomarkers and uric acid in different age groups. Last, a model that included cross-products of tibia lead and combined ALAD/VDR genotype subsets was evaluated in participants in the older half of the population to determine if the genotype association previously reported in this population (lead workers with the ALAD1-1 genotype were statistically less likely to have the VDR bb genotype; Schwartz et al. 2000a) was a factor in the effect modification observed in this study. Only two participants in the older age group had both variant alleles (ALAD1-2/VDR Bb or BB), which precluded meaningful analysis of this group; this subset was removed from the model. The final model assessed differences in the slopes of the relations between tibia lead and uric acid in the group of participants with the ALAD1-2/VDR bb genotypes and the ALAD1-1/VDR Bb or BB genotypes, in separate cross-product terms, compared with the reference group of participants with the ALAD1-1 and VDR bb genotypes.

As in previous analyses (Weaver et al. 2003a), we evaluated models for linear regression assumptions and the presence of outlying points using added variable plots (Weisberg 1985), which are graphical summaries of the relation between y and a particular x adjusted for the other covariates. For each plot, two lines were overlaid: the regression line, and a line determined by a scatter plot smoothing method (lowess) that calculates a locally weighted least squares estimate for each point in the scatter plot (Cleveland 1979). This allows an examination of the data for outliers that are overly influential, as evidenced by inconsistency between the lowess and regression lines. When warranted, models were repeated without outliers. Models were also assessed for collinearity by examining variance inflation factors and conditional indices.

Results

Selected demographics, exposure, and health outcome measures. A total of 79 (9.9%) participants were heterozygous for the ALAD2 allele, and none was homozygous (Table 1). For VDR, 85 (10.7%) were genotype Bb, and 4 (0.5%) were BB. For eNOS, 114 (14.4%) participants were genotype Glu/Asp, and 6 (0.7%) were Asp/Asp. Mean ([+ or -] SD) and frequencies for selected demographic, exposure, and outcome variables are presented by genotype in Table 1. Mean uric acid was normal in all genotype subsets. Medians for selected measures are presented by genotype in groups dichotomized by median age (Table 2).

ALAD. Mean uric acid did not differ by ALAD genotype in the total population or in either age group (dichotomized by median age of 40.6 years). Among all participants, ALAD genotype modified the association between blood lead and uric acid. [3-Coefficients were 0.0047 (p = 0.10) for blood lead in the reference group of those with the ALAD1-1 genotype and-0.0158 (p = 0.05) for the cross-product term of ALAD1-2 genotype and blood lead, respectively (thus, the slope of the relation between blood lead and uric acid in participants with the ALAD1-2 genotype was -0.0111). This effect was confined to workers at or above the median age (Table 3, panels 1 and 2, blood lead models). The inverse nature of these associations by genotype, from the blood lead model in panel 2 of Table 3, is shown graphically in Figure 1. Borderline effect modification on the association between tibia lead and uric acid was also observed in older participants (Table 3, panel 2, tibia lead models). Consistent with known mechanisms for the hyperuricemic effects of lead (Weaver et al. 2005), p-coefficients decreased after additional adjustment for blood pressure and renal function (Table 3, panel 3). Results were similar when calculated creatinine clearance was added to these models instead of serum creatinine (data not shown). Added variable plots (Figure 2) of partial residuals of the tibia lead model (Table 3, panel 2) suggested different tibia lead level ranges by genotype. In order to compare differences over a similar range, data from 43 participants in the ALAD1-1 group with tibia lead levels > 89 lag Pb/g bone mineral (levels above the crude range in participants with the ALAD1-2 genotype) were removed. A positive association between tibia lead and uric acid in those with the ALAD1-1 genotype (Table 3, truncated tibia lead models, panel 2) was then observed.

[FIGURE 1-2 OMITTED]

VDR. Similar to ALAD, VDR genotype was not associated with uric acid levels, and effect modification was confined to older lead workers (Table 4, tibia lead models, panels 1 and 2). However, in contrast to ALAD, tibia lead was positively associated with uric acid in those participants with the variant VDR B allele, and effect modification on associations between blood lead and uric acid was not observed (Table 4). Modeling that included cross-products of tibia lead with combined genotype subsets compared with a reference group of participants with both the ALAD1-1 and VDR bb genotypes revealed that the opposite direction associations between tibia lead and uric acid in participants with the VDR B allele compared with those with the ALAD1-2 allele were not simply due to the genotype associations previously reported in this population (lead workers with the ALAD1-1 genotype were statistically less likely to have the VDR bb genotype; Schwartz et al. 2000a) (Table 5). Similar to ALAD, the range of tibia lead levels differed by genotype (Figure 3). In contrast, when data from 27 participants with the VDR bb genotype with tibia lead levels > 103 lag Pb/g bone mineral (above the range in participants with VDR Bb or BB genotypes) were removed in order to compare differences over a similar range, effect modification was no longer significant (Table 4, truncated tibia lead models, panel 2).

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

eNOS. In contrast to ALAD and VDR, the eNOS genotype was associated with uric acid levels. Mean serum uric acid was lower in participants with the eNOS Asp allele compared with those with the Glu/Glu genotype ([beta] = -0.1913; SE [beta] = 0.0932; p = 0.04; adjusted for age, sex, BMI, serum creatinine, systolic blood pressure, and blood lead). Additional modeling in two groups, dichotomized by median age, revealed that this association was confined to participants in the older half of the population. No effect modification by eNOS genotype on associations of lead biomarkers and uric acid was observed.

Discussion

We evaluated whether polymorphisms in three genes (ALAD, VDR, and eNOS) were associated with uric acid or modified relations of lead biomarkers with uric acid in a cross-sectional analysis of data from the first evaluation in a longitudinal study of 798 current and former Korean lead workers. After adjustment, participants with the eNOS Asp allele had lower mean uric acid. Effect modification by ALAD on associations between lead dose and uric acid was observed in participants whose ages were in the older half of the age range. Higher lead dose was associated with higher uric acid in workers with the ALAD1-1 genotype; associations were in the opposite direction in participants with the ALAD1-2 genotype. VDR genotype modified the association of tibia lead and uric acid, also in the older half of the population. However, in contrast to ALAD, higher tibia lead was associated with higher uric acid in those with the variant B allele, but this effect was dependent on data from participants with the bb genotype and high tibia lead levels.

The ALAD enzyme is a principal lead-binding protein. The isozymes in those with the variant ALAD2 allele bind a greater proportion of blood lead than does the isozyme in individuals with the ALAD1-1 genotype (Bergdahl et al. 1997). In the population that is the focus of this report, mean blood lead was higher in participants with the ALAD1-2 genotype compared with those with the ALAD1-1 genotype (Schwartz et al. 2000a). However, neither tibia nor DMSA-chelatable lead levels differed significantly. Other studies have also reported that participants with the ALAD2 allele have higher blood lead levels than do those with the ALAD1-1 genotype, although studies in populations with mean blood lead levels < 10 [micro]/dL have generally not reported a difference (Hu et al. 2001; Kamel et al. 2003; Kelada et al. 2001). The limited data on associations of ALAD genotype with bone lead levels reveal no difference in some studies (similar to results in our population) (Fleming et al. 1998; Smith et al. 1995). Lower cortical (tibia) and/or trabecular (patella, calcaneus) bone lead levels in those with the ALAD2 allele have been reported in others (Hu et al. 2001; Kamel et al. 2003). Other toxicokinetic differences have also been reported in participants with the ALAD2 allele (Fleming et al. 1998; Hu et al. 2001; Schwartz et al. 1997; Smith et al. 1995). Overall, these data suggest that tighter binding of lead by the isozymes of the ALAD2 allele decreases lead sequestration in bone. Therefore, the impact on toxicity would depend on whether enzyme bound lead is bioavailable and more toxic than lead that is stored in bone and subsequently released. As a result, toxicity may differ by target organ.

Two studies have examined the impact of ALAD genotype on serum uric acid levels in lead exposed populations. In a study of 691 construction workers, whose mean blood lead was 7.8 [micro]/dL, Smith et al. (1995) found borderline (p = 0.09) higher mean uric acid after adjustment for age, alcohol ingestion, and blood lead in the 96 participants with the ALAD2 allele compared with those with the ALAD1-1 genotype. Effect modification was not evaluated. Wu et al. (2003) found no difference in uric acid by genotype in 709 participants in the Normative Aging Study (mean blood lead = 6.2 [micro]/dL). However, effect modification by genotype on associations of patella and tibia lead with uric acid of borderline significance (p < 0.1) was observed; [beta]-coefficients (and slopes) were greater in those with the variant allele. This difference was significant in participants whose patella lead levels were > 15 [micro]/g bone mineral (p = 0.04).

Synthesizing our data with these studies is complicated by the inverse associations we observed. Similar inverse relations between blood and DMSA-chelatable lead and renal outcomes in participants with the ALAD2 allele were previously reported in this population (Weaver et al. 2003b). Because uric acid is filtered at the glomerulus, levels in serum are also influenced by renal function. Therefore, the associations between lead dose and uric acid may be due to the same process causing inverse associations between lead dose and renal function in those with the ALAD2 allele. If this process represents lead-related hyperfiltration, the associations between lead dose and uric acid may become positive as this population ages and eventually, as in the Normative Aging Study, be stronger in those with the ALAD2 allele than in those with the ALAD1-1 genotype. However, several steps are involved in the renal handling of uric acid, including a secretion step in the proximal tubule, which is also thought to be adversely affected by lead. The fact that effect modification by ALAD genotype on associations between tibia lead and uric acid persists after adjustment for renal function suggests that one or more of the other renal handling processes for uric acid are involved. Analysis of our longitudinal data will be very helpful in understanding these complex relations.

The potential for uric acid-related nephrotoxicity must be considered in these associations, as well. When previously published models of effect modification by ALAD on associations between lead dose and renal function (Weaver et al. 2003b) were also controlled for uric acid, the effect modification observed remained statistically significant (data not shown), indicating that this effect is not mediated solely through uric acid. However, the current analyses do provide further evidence, in addition to our recently published results (Weaver et al. 2005), that lead dose increases uric acid in these workers, even after control for variables that are both confounders and mediators, such as blood pressure and renal function.

Polymorphisms of the gene encoding for the VDR are of interest in lead-exposed populations because of the importance of the receptor for calcium absorption and bone mineralization. These pathways affect lead absorption from the gastrointestinal tract and may affect lead storage and/or release from bone (Onalaja and Claudio 2000). In the lead workers studied in this report, participants with the B allele were found to have significantly higher blood, tibia, and DMSA-chelatable lead than did those with the bb genotype (Schwartz et al. 2000a). The effect modification of VDR genotype on the association of tibia lead and uric acid in participants who are in the older half of the population may reflect toxicodynamic differences. However, conclusions must be tempered by the fact that this effect is dependent on, at most, 27 participants with tibia lead levels > 103 lag Pb/g bone mineral who reduce the [beta] estimate of the relation between tibia lead and uric acid in participants with the bb genotype. Further, no associations between VDR genotype and renal outcomes were observed, nor was consistent effect modification by VDR on associations between lead measures and renal outcomes present in this population (Weaver et al. 2003b). Interestingly, the shape of the lowess lines for the relations between tibia lead and uric acid in workers with the common genotypes (ALAD1-1 and VDR bb; Figures 2 and 3) suggests differences at higher tibia lead levels that could reflect survivor bias.

We plan to explore this further in longitudinal analyses.

eNOS catalyzes the transformation of L-arginine to the vasodilator, nitric oxide (NO). Animal models of kidney disease indicate that administration of L-arginine results in decreased renal damage that is thought to be mediated via increased NO (Klahr 2001). The functional significance of the Glu298Asp polymorphism remains uncertain. Some authors have reported decreased NO with the variant Asp allele (Noiri et al. 2002; Persu et al. 2002; Sofowora et al. 2001). However, others have reported no difference in various functional measures (Golser et al. 2003; Hoffmann et al. 2005; Li et al. 2004; Moon et al. 2002). If the Asp allele is ultimately shown to decrease NO, the variant may confer additional risk in lead exposure that also decreases NO (Vaziri 2002). In addition, this eNOS polymorphism may modify lead toxicokinetics. A recent study of data from the third evaluation of the lead workers in this report (n = 652) found that eNOS genotype modified the relation between patella lead and age; workers with the Asp allele had higher increases in patella lead with increasing age than did lead workers who were homozygous for the Glu allele (Theppeang et al. 2004). In the population that is the focus of this report, we found inconsistent associations of eNOS genotype with renal function (higher BUN and measured creatinine clearance in those with the ASp allele) (Weaver et al. 2003b). Effect modification was also noted; longer lead job duration was associated with higher serum creatinine and lower calculated creatinine clearance in participants with the Asp allele and with higher calculated creatinine clearance in participants with the Glu/Glu genotype (Weaver et al. 2003b). The lower uric acid observed in those with the ASp allele may indicate that, if this allele does confer increased renal risk in lead exposed populations, uric acid does not contribute further to that risk.

Our data suggest that all three genetic polymorphisms may affect uric acid in these lead workers. However, effect modification by ALAD genotype on associations between lead dose and uric acid was most consistent with the observed effect modification by this genotype on associations between lead dose and renal function. This work also suggests that effect modification by genotype is present only in the older half of the population. However, our ability to explore effect modification by genotype in different age groups is limited by the small number of participants with the variant alleles in these age-stratified models. As a result, even after removal of outliers, most data points in the variant groups are influential. Longitudinal data analysis will be useful, particularly in understanding the inverse associations seen with ALAD.

Received 14 January 2005; accepted 27 June 2005.

REFERENCES

Bergdahl IA, Grubb A, Schutz A, Desnick R J, Wetmur JG, Sassa S, et al. 1997. Lead binding to [delta]-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD) in human erythrocytes. Pharmacol Toxicol 81:153-158.

Cleveland WS. 1979. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 74:829-836.

Cockcroff DW, Gault MH. 1976. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31-41.

Fernandez FJ. 1975. Micromethod for lead determination in whole blood by atomic absorption, with use of the graphite furnace. Clin Chem 21:558-561.

Fleming DEB, Chettle DR, Wetmur JG, Desnick R J, Robin J-P, Boulay D, et al. 1998. Effect of the [delta]-aminolevulinate dehydratase polymorphism on the accumulation of lead in bone and blood in lead smelter workers. Environ Res 77:49-61.

Golser R, Gorren AC, Mayer B, Schmidt K. 2003. Functional characterization of Glu298Asp mutant human endothelial nitric oxide synthase purified from a yeast expression system. Nitric Oxide 8:7-14.

Hibi K, Ishigami T, Tamura K, Mizushima S, Nyui N, Fujita T, et al. 1998. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism and acute myocardial infarction. Hypertension 32:521-526.

Hoffmann IS, Tavares-Mordwinkin R, Castejon AM, Alfieri AB, Cubeddu LX. 2005. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase polymorphisrn, nitric oxide production, salt sensitivity and cardiovascular risk factors in Hispanics. J Hum Hypertens 3:233-240.

Hu H, Wu M-T, Cheng Y, Sparrow D, Weiss S, Kelsey K. 2001. The [delta]-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD) polymorphism and bone and blood lead levels in community-exposed men: the Normative Aging Study. Environ Health Perspect 109:827-832.

Johnson R J, Kang DH, Feig D, Kivlighn S, Kanellis J, Watanabe S, et al. 2003. Is there a pathogenetic role for uric acid in hypertension and cardiovascular and renal disease? Hypertension 41:1183-1190.

Kamel F, Umbach DM, Lehman TA, Park LP, Munsat TL, Shefner JM, et al. 2003. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, lead, and genetic susceptibility: polymorphisms in the delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase and vitamin D receptor genes. Environ Health Perspect 111:1335-1339.

Kelada SN, Shelton E, Kaufmann RB, Khoury M J. 2001. [delta]-Aminolevulinic acid dehydratase genotype and lead toxicity: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol 154:1-13.

Kim R, Aro A, Rotnitzky A, Amarasiriwardena C, Hu H. 1995. K X-ray fluorescence measurements of bone lead concentration: the analysis of low-level data. Phys Med Biol 40:1475-1485.

Kim R, Rotnitzky A, Sparrow D, Weiss S, Wager C, Hu H. 1996. A longitudinal study of low-level lead exposure and impairment of renal function. JAMA 275:1177-1181.

Klahr S. 2001. The role of nitric oxide in hypertension and renal disease progression. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:60-62.

Li R, Lyn D, Lapu-Bula R, Oduwole A, Igho-Pemu P, Lankford B, et al. 2004. Relation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene te plasma nitric oxide level, endothelial function, and blood pressure in African Americans. Am J Hypertens 17:560-567.

Lin JL, Ho HH, Yu CC. 1999. Chelation therapy for patients with elevated body lead burden and progressive renal insufficiency: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 130:7-13.

Lin JL, Lin-Tan DT, Hsu KH, Yu CC. 2003. Environmental lead exposure and progression of chronic renal diseases in patients without diabetes. N Engl J Med 348:277-286.

Lin JL, Tan DT, Ho HH, Yu CC. 2002. Environmental lead exposure and urate excretion in the general population. Am J Med 113:563-568.

Lin JL, Yu CC, Lin-Tan DT, Ho HH. 2001. Lead chelation therapy and urate excretion in patients with chronic renal diseases and gout. Kidney Int 60:266-271.

Moon J, Yoon S, Kim E, Shin C, Jo SA, Jo I. 2002. Lack of evidence for contribution of Glu298Asp (G894T) polymorphism of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene to plasma nitric oxide levels. Thromb Res 15:129-134.

Muntner P, He J, Vupputuri S, Coresh J, Batuman V. 2003. Blood lead and chronic kidney disease in the general United States population: results from NHANES III. Kidney Int 63:1044-1050.

Noiri E, Satoh H, Taguchi J, Brodsky SV, Nakao A, 0gawa Y, et al. 2002. Association of eNOS Glu298Asp polymorphism with end-stage renal disease. Hypertension 40:535-540.

0nalaja A0, Claudio L. 2000. Genetic susceptibility to lead poisoning. Environ Health Perspect 108(suppl 1):23-28.

Parsons P J, Slavin W. 1999. Electrothermal atomization atomic absorption spectrometry for the determination of lead in urine: results of an interlaboratory study. Spectrochim Acta B 54:853-864.

Payton M, Hu H, Sparrow D, Weiss S. 1994. Low-level lead exposure and renal function in the Normative Aging Study. Am J Epidemiol 140:821-829.

Persu A, Stoenoiu MS, Messiaen T, Davila S, Robino C, EI-Khattabi O, et al. 2002. Modifier effect of ENOS in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Hum Mol Gen 11:229-241.

Schwartz BS, Lee BK, Lee GS, Stewart WF, Lee SS, Hwang KY, et al. 2001. Associations of blood lead, dimercaptosuccinic acid-chelatable lead, and tibia lead with neurobehavioral test scores in South Korean lead workers. Am J Epidemiol 153:493-464.

Schwartz BS, Lee B-K, Lee G-S, Stewart WF, Simon D, Kelsey K, et al. 2000a. Associations of blood lead, dirnercaptosuccinic acid-chelatable lead, and tibia lead with polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor and [delta]-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase genes. Environ Health Perspect 108:949-954.

Schwartz BS, Lee B-K, Stewart W, Ahn K-D, Springer K, Kelsey K. 1995. Associations of [delta]-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase genotype with plant, exposure duration, and blood lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels in Korean lead workers. Am J Epidemiol 142:738-745.

Schwartz BS, Lee B-K, Stewart W, Sithisarankul P, Strickland PT, Ahn K-D, et al. 1997.[delta]-Aminolevulinic acid dehydratase genotype modifies 4-hour urinary lead excretion after oral administration of dimercaptosuccinic acid. 0ccup Environ Med 54:241-246.

Schwartz BS, Stewart WF, Kelsey KT, Simon D, Park S, Links JM, et al. 2000b. Associations of tibial lead levels with Bsml polymorphisms in the vitamin O receptor in former organolead manufacturing workers. Environ Health Perspect 108:199-203.

Shadick NA, Kim R, Weiss S, Liang MH, Sparrow D, Hu H. 2000. Effect of low level lead exposure on hyperuricemia and gout among middle aged and elderly men: the Normative Aging Study. J Rheumatol 27:1708-1712.

Smith CM, Wang X, Hu H, Kelsey KT. 1995. A polymorphism in the [delta]-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase gene may modify the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of lead. Environ Health Perspect 103:248-253.

Sofowora G, Dishy V, Xie H-G, Imamura H, Nishimi Y, Morales CR, et al. 2001. In-vivo effects of Glu298Asp endothelial nitric oxide synthase polymorphism. Pharmacogenetics 11:809-814.

Staessen JA, Lauwerys RR, Buchet JP, Bulpitt C J, Rondia D, Vanrenterghem Y, et al. 1992. Impairment of renal function with increasing blood lead concentrations in the general population. N Engl J Med 327:151-156.

Theppeang K, Schwartz BS, Lee BK, Lustberg ME, Silbergeld EK, Kelsey KT, et al. 2004. Associations of patella lead with polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor, delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase and endothelial nitric oxide synthase genes. J Occup Environ Med 46:529-537.

Todd AC, Chettle DR. 1994. In vivo X-ray fluorescence of lead in bone: review and current issues. Environ Health Perspect 102:172-177.

Todd AC, McNeill FE. 1993. In vivo measurements of lead in bone using a (109)Cd "spot" source. In: Human Body Composition (Ellis K J, Eastman JD, eds). New York:Plenum Press, 299-302.

Topping MD, Forster HW, Dolman C, Luczynska CM, Bernard AM. 1986. Measurement of urinary retinol-binding protein by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and its application to detection of tubular proteinuria. Clin Chem 32:1863-1866.

Vaziri ND. 2002. Pathogenesis of lead-induced hypertension: role of oxidative stress. J Hypertens 20:S15-S20.

Weaver VM, Jaar BG, Schwartz BS, Todd AC, Ahn K-D, Lee S-S, et al. 2005. Associations among lead dose biomarkers, uric acid, and renal function in Korean lead workers. Environ Health Perspect 113:36-42; doi:10.1289/EHP.7317 [Online 30 September 2004].

Weaver VM, Lee B-K, Ahn K-D, Lee G-S, Todd AC, Stewart WF, et al. 2003a. Associations of lead biomarkers with renal function in Korean lead workers. 0ccup Environ Med 60:551-562.

Weaver VM, Schwartz BS, Ahn K-D, Stewart WF, Kelsey KT, Todd AC, et al. 2003b. Associations of renal function with polymorphisms in the [delta]-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase, vitamin D receptor, and nitric oxide synthase genes in Korean lead workers. Environ Health Perspect 111:1613-1619; doi:10.1289/ehp.6116 [Online 12 June 2003].

Weisberg S. 1985. Applied Linear Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Wetmur JG, Lehnert G, Desnick RJ. 1991. The [delta]-aminolevulinate dehydratase polyrnorphism: higher blood lead levels in lead workers and environmentally exposed children with the 1-2 and 2-2 isozymes. Environ Res 56:109-119.

Wu M-T, Kelsey K, Schwartz J, Sparrow D, Weiss S, Hu H. 2003. A [delta]-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD) polymorphism may modify the relationship of low-level lead exposure to uricemia and renal function: the Normative Aging Study. Environ Health Perspect 111:335-340.

Yu CC, Lin JL, Lin-Tan DT. 2004. Environmental exposure te lead and progression of chronic renal diseases: a four-year prospective longitudinal study. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:1016-1022.

Ziemsen B, Angerer J, Lehnert G, Benkmann HG, Goedde HW. 1986. Polymorphism of delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase in lead-exposed workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 58:245-247.

Virginia M. Weaver,(1,2) Brian S. Schwartz, (1,2,3) Bernard G. Jaar, (2,3) Kyu-Dong Ahn, (4) Andrew C. Todd, (5) Sung-Soo Lee, (4) Karl T. Kelsey, (6) Ellen K. Silbergeld, (7) Mark E. Lustberg, (8,* ) Patrick J. Parsons, (9) Jiayu Wen, (1) and Byung-Kook Lee (4)

(1) Division of Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; (2) Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; (3) Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; (4) Institute of Industrial Medicine, SoonChunHyang University, Asan, South Korea; (5) Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; (6) Department of Cancer Cell Biology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; (7) Division of Environmental Health Engineering, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; (8)Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; (9)Lead Poisoning/Trace Elements Laboratory, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA

Address correspondence to B.-K. Lee, Institute of Industrial Medicine, SoonChunHyang University, 646 Eupnae-Ri, Shinchang-Myun, Asan-Si, Choongnam, 336-745 South Korea. Telephone: [phone]. Fax: [phone]. E-mail: [e-mail]

* Current address: Department of Medicine, York Hospital, York, PA.

We thank Y.-B. Kim, B.-K. Jang, and G.-S. Lee for assistance with data collection in South Korea and J. Wetmur of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine for providing the nested primers for ALAD genotyping.

This research was supported by the following grants: ES07198 (B.S.S.), 2 ES07198 (V.M.W.), ES00002 (K.T.K.), and National Research Service Award F30-ES05922-02 (M.E.L.) from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; KRF2000-00545 (B.-K.L.) from the Korea Research Foundation; ATPM TS288-14/14 (E.K.S.) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and the Richard Ross Clinician Scientist Award (B.G.J.) from the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

The authors declare they have no competing financial interests.

Table 1. Selected demographic, exposure, and outcome variables by ALAD,
eNOS, and VDR genotype in 798 Korean lead workers. (a)
                                                ALAD

Characteristic                      1-1                    1-2

No. (%)                          716 (90.1)              79 (9.9)
Sex n (%)
  Male                           569 (79.5)             62 (78.5)
  Female                         147 (20.5)             17 (21.5)
Alcohol use, n(%)
  No previous alcohol            207 (29.0)             24 (30.4)
  Current use                    466 (65.2)             49 (62.0)
  Past use                        42 (5.9)               6 (7.6)
BMI (kg/[m.sup.2])           23.1 [+ or -] 3.0      22.3 [+ or -] 2.6
Age (years)                  40.5 [+ or -] 10.2     40.1 [+ or -] 9.7
Systolic blood pressure     123.4 [+ or -] 16.5    122.3 [+ or -] 14.5
  (mm Hg)
Blood lead ([micro]g/dL)     31.7 [+ or -] 14.9     34.2 [+ or -] 15.9
Tibia lead ([micro]g         37.5 [+ or -] 40.6     31.4 [+ or -] 29.5
  Pb/g bone mineral)
DMSA-chelatable lead         0.76 [+ or -] 0.82     0.84 [+ or -] 1.19
  ([micro]gPb/mg
  creatinine)
Uric acid (mg/dL)             4.8 [+ or -] 1.2       4.6 [+ or -] 1.1
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)     0.90 [+ or -] 0.15     0.86 [+ or -] 0.12

                                                eNOS

Characteristic                    Glu/Glu           Asp/Glu or Asp/Asp

No. (%)                          673 (84.9)             120 (15.1
Sex n (%)
  Male                           537 (79.8)             93 (77.5)
  Female                         136 (20.2)             27 (22.5)
Alcohol use, n(%)
  No previous alcohol            201 (30.0)             30 (25.0)
  Current use                    429 (63.8)             84 (70.0)
  Past use                        42 (6.3)               6 (5.0)
BMI (kg/[m.sup.2])           23.1 [+ or -] 3.0      22.7 [+ or -] 2.8
Age (years)                  40.3 [+ or -] 10.1     41.1 [+ or -] 10.1
Systolic blood pressure     123.4 [+ or -] 16.5    122.7 [+ or -] 15.5
  (mm Hg)
Blood lead ([micro]g/dL)     32.0 [+ or -] 15.1     31.2 [+ or -] 14.6
Tibia lead ([micro]g         37.5 [+ or -] 41.6     35.8 [+ or -] 34.0
  Pb/g bone mineral)
DMSA-chelatable lead         0.78 [+ or -] 0.90     0.72 [+ or -] 0.62
  ([micro]gPb/mg
  creatinine)
Uric acid (mg/dL)             4.9 [+ or -] 1.2       4.6 [+ or -] 1.1
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)     0.90 [+ or -] 0.16     0.89 [+ or -] 0.13

                                                VDR

Characteristic                       bb                  Bb or BB

No. (%)                          709 (88.8)              89 (11.2)
Sex n (%)
  Male                           572 (80.7)              62 (69.7)
  Female                         137 (19.3)              27 (30.3)
Alcohol use, n(%)
  No previous alcohol            208 (29.4)              23 (25.8)
  Current use                    456 (64.4)              62 (69.7)
  Past use                        44 (6.2)                4 (4.5)
BMI (kg/[m.sup.2])           22.9 [+ or -] 2.9      23.9 [+ or -] 3.4
Age (years)                  40.2 [+ or -] 10.1     42.7 [+ or -] 10.3
Systolic blood pressure     122.6 [+ or -] 15.6    129.1 [+ or -] 20.6
  (mm Hg)
Blood lead ([micro]g/dL)     31.6 [+ or -] 14.8     34,8 [+ or -] 16.1
Tibia lead ([micro]g         37.1 [+ or -] 41.2     38.1 [+ or -] 33.5
  Pb/g bone mineral)
DMSA-chelatable lead         0.75 [+ or -] 0.87     0.93 [+ or -] 0.76
  ([micro]gPb/mg
  creatinine)
Uric acid (mg/dL)             4.8 [+ or -] 1.2       4.7 [+ or -] 1.1
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)     0.90 [+ or -] 0.16     0.89 [+ or -] 0.13

ALAD, eNOS, and VDR genotyping were completed on 795, 793, and 798 lead
workers, respectively. Modified from Weaver et al. (2003b).

(a) Values are mean [+ or -] SD unless otherwise noted.

Table 2. Medians of selected demographic, exposure, and outcome
variables in Korean lead workers by ALAD and VDR genotype in two
groups dichotomized by median age (40.6 years).

                                          ALAD

                          Age < 40.6 years     Age [is greater than or
                                                equal to] 40.6 years

Characteristic           1-1          1-2          1-1        1-2

No. (a)                   355          42          361         37
Age (years)              32.8         33.3        48.6        49.4
Lead job duration         3.9          4.1         9.7         9.5
  (years)
Blood lead               28.8         31.9        30.4        34.3
  ([micro]g/dL)
Tibia lead               20.9         22.1        30.7        25.6
  ([micro]g Pb/g
  bone mineral)
DMSA-chelatable           0.39         0.54        0.64        0.64
  lead ([micro]g
  Pb/mg creatinine)
Uric acid (mg/dL)         5.1          4.9         4.4         4.1
BUN (mg/dL)              13.9         12.4        14.4        13.7
Serum creatinine          0.93         0.89        0.88        0.81
  (mg/dL)
Measured creatinine     121.8        119.0       101.4       108.9
  clearance (mL/min)
Calculated              102.9        102.0        83.4        85.4
  creatinine
  clearance (mL/min)

                                              VDR

                           Age < 40.6 years    Age [is greater than or
                                                equal to] 40.6 years

Characteristic            bb       Bb or BB      bb       Bb or BB

No. (a)                   360         38         349         51
Age (years)               32.7       33.7        48.3       49.7
Lead job duration          3.8        4.2         9.8        8.3
  (years)
Blood lead                29.5       29.4        30.4       35.5
  ([micro]g/dL)
Tibia lead                20.9       25.4        29.4       35.1
  ([micro]g Pb/g
  bone mineral)
DMSA-chelatable            0.39       0.6         0.62       0.82
  lead ([micro]g
  Pb/mg creatinine)
Uric acid (mg/dL)          5.1        5.2         4.4        4.2
BUN (mg/dL)               13.7       13.1        14.4       14.0
Serum creatinine           0.92       0.91        0.87       0.86
  (mg/dL)
Measured creatinine      121.5      118.1       103.3      100.6
  clearance (mL/min)
Calculated               102.8      101.6        83.6       83.1
  creatinine
  clearance (mL/min)

(a) Actual value, not median.

Table 3. Linear regression models of uric acid, evaluating effect
modification by ALAD genotype on associations of blood and tibia lead
in two groups of lead workers, dichotomized by median age (40.6 years).

                                  Panel 1: age < 40.6 years

Variable                     [beta]-        SE [beta]      p-Value
                             Coefficient

Blood lead models
  Intercept                     4.4070         0.1776        <0.01
  Age (years)                  -0.0348         0.0084        <0.01
  Systolic blood pressure         --             --             --
  (mm Hg)
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)        --             --             --
  ALAD1-2                      -0.2619         0.1591         0.10
  Blood lead ([micro]g/        -0.0043         0.0040         0.27
  dL) (a)
  Blood lead x ALAD1-2 (b)     -0.0161         0.0134         0.23
Tibia lead models
  Intercept                     4.3928         0.1746        <0.01
  Age (years)                  -0.0335         0.0083        <0.01
  Systolic blood pressure         --             --             --
  (mm Hg)
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)        --             --             --
  ALAD1-2                      -0.3553         0.2330         0.13
  Tibia lead ([micro]g         -0.0044         0.0020         0.03
  Pb/g bone mineral) (a)
  Tibia lead x ALAD1-2 (b)     -0.0047         0.0103         0.65
Truncated tibia lead
  models (c)
  Intercept
  Age (years)
  Systolic blood pressure
  (mm Hg)
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)
  ALAD1-2
  Tibia lead ([micro]g
  Pb/g bone mineral) (a)
  Tibia lead x ALAD1-2 (b)

                             Panel 2: age [greater than or equal to]
                                            40.6 years

Variable                     [beta]-        SE [beta]      p-Value
                             Coefficient

Blood lead models
  Intercept                     4.7507         0.1108        <0.01
  Age (years)                  -0.0123         0.0098         0.21
  Systolic blood pressure         --             --             --
  (mm Hg)
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)        --             --             --
  ALAD1-2                      -0.0292         0.1776         0.87
  Blood lead ([micro]g/         0.0127         0.0040        <0.01
  dL) (a)
  Blood lead x ALAD1-2 (b)     -0.0212         0.0102         0.04
Tibia lead models
  Intercept                     4.7280         0.1075        <0.01
  Age (years)                  -0.0062         0.0096         0.52
  Systolic blood pressure         --             --             --
  (mm Hg)
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)        --             --             --
  ALAD1-2                      -0.1993         0.2013         0.32
  Tibia lead ([micro]g          0.0009         0.0013         0.48
  Pb/g bone mineral) (a)
  Tibia lead x ALAD1-2 (b)     -0.0151         0.0079         0.06
Truncated tibia lead
  models (c)
  Intercept                     4.8218         0.1159        <0.01
  Age (years)                  -0.0074         0.0103         0.48
  Systolic blood pressure         --             --             --
  (mm Hg)
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)        --             --             --
  ALAD1-2                      -0.2763         0.2110         0.19
  Tibia lead ([micro]g          0.0079         0.0027        <0.01
  Pb/g bone mineral) (a)
  Tibia lead x ALAD1-2 (b)     -0.0214         0.0084         0.01

                             Panel 3: age [greater than or equal to]
                                            40.6 years

Variable                     [beta]-        SE [beta]      p-Value
                             Coefficient

Blood lead models
  Intercept                     4.5906         0.1078        <0.01
  Age (years)                  -0.0188         0.0098         0.06
  Systolic blood pressure       0.0046         0.0027         0.09
  (mm Hg)
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)      2.4921         0.3799        <0.01
  ALAD1-2                       0.0870         0.1693         0.61
  Blood lead ([micro]g/         0.0089         0.0038         0.02
  dL) (a)
  Blood lead x ALAD1-2 (b)     -0.0143         0.0098         0.14
Tibia lead models
  Intercept                     4.6027         0.1074        <0.01
  Age (years)                  -0.0157         0.0098         0.11
  Systolic blood pressure       0.0059         0.0027         0.03
  (mm Hg)
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)      2.0767         0.4380        <0.01
  ALAD1-2                      -0.1180         0.1955         0.55
  Tibia lead ([micro]g          0.0002         0.0013         0.89
  Pb/g bone mineral) (a)
  Tibia lead x ALAD1-2 (b)     -0.0138         0.0077         0.07
Truncated tibia lead
  models (c)
  Intercept                     4.6499         0.1159        <0.01
  Age (years)                  -0.0160         0.0103         0.12
  Systolic blood pressure       0.0058         0.0028         0.04
  (mm Hg)
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)      2.3661         0.4620        <0.01
  ALAD1-2                      -0.1737         0.2033         0.39
  Tibia lead ([micro]g          0.0063         0.0026         0.02
  Pb/g bone mineral) (a)
  Tibia lead x ALAD1-2 (b)     -0.0193         0.0080         0.02

--, model shown was not adjusted forth at covariate. Panels 1 and 2
display results in the younger and older groups, respectively. Panel 3
shows results in the older group after additional control for systolic
blood pressure and serum creatinine. Models were also adjusted for sex,
BMI, and alcohol use.

(a) Reference category of homozygotes for the common gene allele
(ALADI-1).

(b) p-Values for the cross-product terms reflect the
statistical significance of the difference between the slopes of
the regression line for the variant gene group and the regression line
for the reference gene group; slopes in the variant gene group are
obtained by adding the [beta]-coefficient of the cross-product term to
the [beta]-coefficient for the reference category [i.e., the slope of
the relation between blood lead and uric acid in those with ALAD1-2
genotype is-0.0085 in panel 2(0.0127 +-0.0212]].

(c) Tibia lead levels
> 89 [micro]g Pb/g bone mineral were removed from models.

Table 4. Linear regression models of uric acid, evaluating effect
modification by VDR genotype on associations of blood and tibia
lead in two groups of lead workers, dichotomized by median age
(40.6 years).

                                          Panel 1: age < 40.6 years

                                      [beta]-
                                    Coefficient   SE [beta]   p-Value

Blood lead models
  Intercept                              4.3906      0.1754     <0.01
  Age (years)                           -0.0341      0.0083     <0.01
  Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)           --          --        --
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)                  --          --        --
  VDR Bb or BB                           0.0073      0.1654      0.97
  Blood lead ([micro]g/dL) (a)          -0.0056      0.0040      0.17
  Blood lead x VDR Bb or BB (b)          0.0018      0.0109      0.87

Tibia lead models
  Intercept                              4.3660      0.1756     <0.01
  Age (years)                           -0.0338      0.0083     <0.01
  Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)           --          --        --
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)                  --          --        --
  VDR Bb or BB                          -0.0599      0.2093      0.78
  Blood lead ([micro]g/dL) (a)          -0.0038      0.0021      0.07
  Blood lead x VDR Bb or BB (b)         -0.0033      0.0083      0.69

Truncated tibia lead models (c)
  Intercept
  Age (years)
  Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)
  VDR Bb or BB
  Blood lead ([micro]g/dL) (a)
  Blood lead x VDR Bb or BB (b)

                                        Panel 2: age [greater than
                                         or equal to] 40.6 years

                                      [beta]-
                                    Coefficient   SE [beta]   p-Value

Blood lead models
  Intercept                              4.7529      0.1104     <0.01
  Age (years)                           -0.0118      0.0099      0.23
  Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)           --          --        --
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)                  --          --        --
  VDR Bb or BB                          -0.0447      0.1565      0.78
  Blood lead ([micro]g/dL) (a)           0.0111      0.0040     <0.01
  Blood lead x VDR Bb or BB (b)         -0.0041      0.0093      0.66

Tibia lead models
  Intercept                              4.7474      0.1070     <0.01
  Age (years)                           -0.0027      0.0097      0.78
  Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)           --          --        --
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)                  --          --        --
  VDR Bb or BB                           0.0842      0.1515      0.58
  Blood lead ([micro]g/dL) (a)          -0.0008      0.0014      0.57
  Blood lead x VDR Bb or BB (b)          0.0138      0.0062      0.03

Truncated tibia lead models (c)
  Intercept                              4.7765      0.1110     <0.01
  Age (years)                           -0.0057      0.0101      0.57
  Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)           --          --        --
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)                  --          --        --
  VDR Bb or BB                           0.0502      0.1555      0.75
  Blood lead ([micro]g/dL) (a)           0.0036      0.0023      0.12
  Blood lead x VDR Bb or BB (b)          0.0100      0.0064      0.12

                                        Panel 3: age [greater than
                                          or equal to] 40.6 years

                                      [beta]-
                                    Coefficient   SE [beta]   p-Value

Blood lead models
  Intercept                              4.6087      0.1074     <0.01
  Age (years)                           -0.0190      0.0099      0.06
  Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)        0.0056      0.0027      0.04
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)               2.1009      0.3302     <0.01
  VDR Bb or BB                          -0.1201      0.1502      0.42
  Blood lead ([micro]g/dL) (a)           0.0087      0.0038      0.02
  Blood lead x VDR Bb or BB (b)         -0.0026      0.0089      0.77

Tibia lead models
  Intercept                              4.6267      0.1064     <0.01
  Age (years)                           -0.0122      0.0098      0.22
  Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)        0.0061      0.0027      0.02
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)               2.1603      0.4382     <0.01
  VDR Bb or BB                          -0.0140      0.1484      0.93
  Blood lead ([micro]g/dL) (a)           0.0015      0.0014      0.27
  Blood lead x VDR Bb or BB (b)          0.0142      0.0060      0.02

Truncated tibia lead models (c)
  Intercept                              4.6361      0.1108     <0.01
  Age (years)                           -0.0142      0.0101      0.16
  Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)        0.0061      0.0028      0.03
  Serum creatinine (mg/dL)               2.2604      0.4534     <0.01
  VDR Bb or BB                          -0.0608      0.1522      0.69
  Blood lead ([micro]g/dL) (a)           0.0026      0.0022      0.26
  Blood lead x VDR Bb or BB (b)          0.0106      0.0062      0.09

--, model shown was not adjusted for that covariate. Panels 1 and
2 display results in the younger and older groups, respectively.
Panel 3 shows results in the older group after additional control
for systolic blood pressure and serum creatinine. Models were also
adjusted for sex, BMI, and alcohol use.

(a) Reference category of homozygotes for the common gene allele
(VDR bb).

(b) p-Values for the cross-product terms reflect the statistical
significance of the difference between the slopes of the regression
line for the variant gene group and the regression line for the
reference gene group; slopes in the variant gene group are obtained
by adding the [beta]-coefficient of the cross-product term to the
R-coefficient for the reference category [i.e., the slope of the
relation between tibia lead and uric acid in those with VDR Bb or
BB genotypes is 0.0130 in panel 2 (-0.0008 + 0.0138)].

(c) Tibia lead levels > 103 [micro]g Pb/g bone mineral were removed
from models.

Table 5. Linear regression model evaluating effect modification by
combined ALAD and VDR genotypes on the association between tibia lead
and uric acid, in lead workers [greater than or equal to] 40.6 years
of age (median).

                                       [beta]-
Blood lead models                    Coefficient   SE [beta]   p-Value

Intercept                               4.6078      0.1086     <0.01
Age (years)                            -0.0133      0.0099      0.18
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)         0.0058      0.0027      0.03
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)                2.1352      0.4420     <0.01
ALAD1-2and VDR bb                      -0.1086      0.2067      0.60
ALAD1-1 and VDR Bb or BB                0.0111      0.1533      0.94
Tibia lead ([micro]g Pb/g
  bone mineral) (a)                    -0.0008      0.0014      0.59
Tibia lead x ALAD1-2 and VDR bb (b)    -0.0122      0.0079      0.12
Tibia lead x ALAD1-1
  and VDR Bb or BB (b)                  0.0140      0.0061      0.02

Models were also adjusted for sex, BMI, and alcohol use.

(a) Reference category for homozygotes for both common
gene alleles (ALAD1-1 and VDR bb).

(b) p-Values for the cross-product terms reflect the statistical
significance of the difference between the slopes of the regression
line for the variant gene groups and the regression line for the
reference gene group. Slopes in the variant gene groups are obtained
by adding the [beta]-coefficient of the cross-product term to the
[beta]-coefficient for the reference category [i.e., the slope of
the relation between tibia lead and uric acid in those with both
the ALAD1-1 and VDR Bb or BB genotypes is 0.0132 (-0.0008 + 0.0140)].