Assembly 101.What's happening on the plant floor? We asked Rodney Rodney may refer to: Surnames
Dutch painter whose largely religious works are characterized by grotesque, fantastic creatures mingling with human figures. Noun 1. Rexroth Rex·roth , Kenneth 1905-1982. American writer and translator known especially for his poetry, collected in volumes such as The Phoenix and the Tortoise (1944) and In Defense of Earth (1956). (www.boschrexroth.com; Hoffman Estates Hoffman Estates A village of northeast Illinois, a suburb of Chicago. Population: 49,700. , IL) to take us through the issues facing OEMs as they weigh automation versus manpower, and determine the best way to share information from plant-floor equipment. AD & P: What happened to the drive toward assembly plant automation? Rusk: The automakers moved toward more automation in the hopes of producing vehicles faster, better, and cheaper by improving uptime and lessening the amount of manpower on their assembly lines. Unfortunately, in some cases, they locked themselves into only being able to do things a certain way because of the automation. They got the upfront savings they wanted, but any significant changes in what they were building resulted in reworking the machine or line. As a result, their long-term Long-term Three or more years. In the context of accounting, more than 1 year. long-term 1. Of or relating to a gain or loss in the value of a security that has been held over a specific length of time. Compare short-term. costs rose significantly. AD & P: Is this the reason for the move to more flexible assembly? Rusk: It's it's 1. Contraction of it is. 2. Contraction of it has. See Usage Note at its. it's it is or it has it's be ~have one of them. The shift we're seeing has manufacturers developing systems that--with the equipment they buy--gives enough flexibility to adapt to future changes with minor modifications to their assembly lines. In some cases, this means adding manpower because it is more adaptive than a machine built to certain specifications. For automakers, the biggest growth in manpower has been in powertrain production, where tweaks are made to a design almost every year. Automation flexibility, on the other hand, is critical in production of the vehicle structure where vehicle lifecycles run, on average, five years. However, after five years you don't want to throw away everything and start fresh, so you specify levels of flexibility in the machinery. AD & P: What has this done to the purchasing process Purchasing Purchasing is the formal process of buying goods and services. The Purchasing Process can vary from one organization to another but there are some key elements that are common throughout The process usually starts with a 'Demand' or requirements ? Rusk: It has become much more complicated for the OEMs because there are more variables to consider, including identifying vendors whose products are both forward and backward compatible Refers to hardware or software that is compatible with earlier versions of the product. Also called "downward compatible." Contrast with forward compatible. backward compatible - backward compatibility . Beyond this, the three things OEMs should look for are: (1) the total machine design, (2) the manpower cost equation, and (3) upfront versus lifecycle costs for the entire line. AD & P: What two topics are at the top of everyone's list these days? Rusk: One is how the plant-floor equipment interfaces to the enterprise system. There is a global fight over how to transfer data from the proprietary systems automakers have built up over the years. There are champions for both the Profi-bus and Ethernet Ethernet Telecommunications networking protocol introduced by Xerox Corp. in 1979. It was developed as an inexpensive way of sending information quickly between office machines connected together in a single room or building, but it rapidly became a standard computer IP configurations, though I think the Ethernet will win in the end. Nevertheless, we have to be ready for either one until there is a clear winner. Manufacturing has become much more reliable on a Windows-style software environment because it is more flexible and the programs are easier to use. However, it's also opened us up to virus exposure, software stability concerns, and trying to stay ahead of the curve to ensure that one thing they have done for one customer in the base program doesn't adversely affect us in future generations. The other area of concern is safety. The safety concern includes knowing when machines are in safe-stop positions, and being able to protect humans from harm if they go into machines to do work. There is no overall global safety standard, and each region has its own philosophy on the subject. North American North American named after North America. North American blastomycosis see North American blastomycosis. North American cattle tick see boophilusannulatus. and Europe, in my opinion, are far ahead in trying to integrate safety into their machine designs because of the liability issues. Asia, where personal responsibility is expected, is beginning to push toward an industry standard safety protocol because of their move into North American and Europe with manufacturing facilities. It's not that they haven't thought of safety on their own, just that they have not thought of it in the same way. We're all going to have to come to some kind of consensus because companies like DaimlerChrysler and Ford view this as a differentiator for their suppliers.--CAS |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion