Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,504,174 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Asia Web Holdings Inc. Files Complaint Against PT. Jaring Data Interaktif and Related Parties.


Business Editors/Legal Writers

CARLSBAD, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 17, 2000

Asia Web Holdings Inc. (OTCBB OTCBB

See OTC Bulletin Board (OTCBB).
:AWHI AWHI Agricultural Worker Health Initiative (California) ) (the "company") announced today that on Nov. 13, 2000, the company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware The United States District Court for the District of Delaware is the Federal district court having jurisdiction over the entire state of Delaware. The Court sits in Wilmington. Currently, three judges and two magistrate judges preside over the court.  naming as defendants PT. Jaring Data Interaktif ("JDI JDI Just Do It
JDI Job Description Index
JDI Journal Descriptor Indexing
JDI Java Driver Interface
JDI Jetdirect Internal
JDI Joint Declaration of Intent
JDI Jouyssance des Instruments (Manhattan Beach, California period music ensemble) 
"), an Indonesian corporation, Peter F. Gontha, Francois Gontha, Dewi Allice Lydia Gontha, Adisatrya Suryo Sulisto, Ahmad Sidik Mauladi ("Dicky") Iskandar Di Nata, Alanberg Pte.Ltd. ("Alanberg"), Marlon Buno, Lincoln Stone, and Bosko Djordjevic (collectively, the "defendants").

Asia Web Holdings Inc. v. PT. Jaring Data Interaktif, et al., Case No. 00-949, United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in a conspiracy to defraud the company of approximately 80% ownership in the company and approximately $900,000 invested with defendants in connection with the Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement"), dated March 24, 2000, as amended, by and between the company, Acubid Acquisition Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary Wholly Owned Subsidiary

A subsidiary whose parent company owns 100% of its common stock.

Notes:
In other words, the parent company owns the company outright and there are no minority owners.
 of the company, JDI and Adisatrya Suryo Sulisto, a 90% shareholder of JDI (who subsequently assigned his rights and obligations under the Purchase Agreement to Alanberg, who purchased the 90% ownership of JDI from Sulisto).

The company asserts claims against the defendants based on violations of the Federal securities laws, fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent inducement and concealment, civil conspiracy, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, conversion, impossibility and impracticability of performance and frustration of purpose frustration of purpose n. sometimes called commercial frustration, when unexpected events arise which make a contract impossible to be performed, entitling the frustrated party to rescind the contract without paying damages.  of the Purchase Agreement and transactions described therein. Among other relief, the company is seeking a declaration that the transactions governed by the Purchase Agreement (including, but not limited to, the issuance of 44,000,000 shares of common stock of the company (approximately 80% of the issued and outstanding shares of the company)) are void, compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys' fees and costs and such other preliminary or permanent equitable relief as may be necessary to secure the voiding of the transactions which are more fully described in the complaint.

On or about Nov. 8, 2000, the defendants attempted to take control of the company based upon Alanberg's purported ownership of approximately 80% of the common stock of the company. The company has taken the position that such shares were illegally obtained by Alanberg and, therefore, are void and cancelled.

In a related matter, as previously reported, the company is a defendant in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California The United States District Court for the Southern District of California is the federal district court whose jurisdiction comprises the following counties in California: Imperial and San Diego.  (Selim K. Zilkha Trust, et al., v. Asia Web Holdings Inc., Case No. 00 CV 2025 J). Plaintiffs filed an Application for a Temporary Restraining Order temporary restraining order: see injunction.  and Preliminary Injunction which was denied by the trial court on Oct. 20, 2000. On that same date, Plaintiffs filed an emergency appeal with the United States Court of Appeals The United States courts of appeals (or circuit courts) are the intermediate appellate courts of the United States federal court system. A court of appeals decides appeals from the district courts within its federal judicial circuit, and in some instances from other  for the Ninth Circuit (the "Ninth Circuit"). On Nov. 3, 2000, the Ninth Circuit remanded the matter to the trial court for reconsideration and granted a temporary injunction which will be lifted or enforced through a trial on the merits on the merits adj. referring to a judgment, decision or ruling of a court based upon the facts presented in evidence and the law applied to that evidence. A judge decides a case "on the merits" when he/she bases the decision on the fundamental issues and considers  when the trial court rules on the reconsideration. The company has filed a motion to dismiss the case which is scheduled for hearing before the trial court on Dec. 4, 2000.

Note: Certain statements in this press release constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) implemented several significant substantive changes affecting certain cases brought under the federal securities laws, including changes related to pleading, discovery, liability, class representation and awards fees and  of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the combined companies to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
COPYRIGHT 2000 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Nov 17, 2000
Words:606
Previous Article:Vari-Lite International, Inc. Completes Sale of Showco, Inc.
Next Article:S&P Assigns Keystone State Life Insurance `BBpi' FSR.



Related Articles
Retailer sued for allegedly hindering subway. (suits relating to the Los Angeles County Metro Rail system project)
PENDING CASES INVOLVING THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS.
Texas Religious Right Allies Accused Of Campaign Violations.
Telekom Malaysia Eyes Purchase Of Rival ISP.
CARNEY SUES COURT-TRIAL WITNESSES 2 HOSPITALS, STAFFERS NAMED.(News)
WATER DISTRICT DEFENDS ITSELF IN HOME SUIT.(News)
DEVELOPER FILES FOR BANKRUPTCY; RITTER RANCH PROJECT AGAIN ON HOLD; NO HOMES BUILT YET.(News)
COUNTY TO PAY NEWHALL PROPERTY OWNER $100,000 IN CLEANUP CLAIM.(News)(Statistical Data Included)
BUSINESS NOTES\Developments.(NEWS)
Tae-Bo creator Blanks hit with setback in suit against agent. (Law).(Billy Blanks )(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles