Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,787,488 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Ashker v. California Dept. of Corrections.


U.S. District Court

PACKAGES

REGULATIONS

Ashker v. California Dept. of Corrections, 224 F.Supp.2d 1253 (N.D.Cal. 2002). State prisoners brought a [section] 1983 action challenging a prison requirement that books received from vendors have a special shipping label attached, alleging violation of their First Amendment rights. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the prisoners and held that injunctive relief injunctive relief n. a court-ordered act or prohibition against an act or condition which has been requested, and sometimes granted, in a petition to the court for an injunction.  was warranted. The court held that the policy unduly burdened the prisoners' First Amendment rights, noting that the policy was not applied to non-book packages. The court also noted that the goal of reducing opportunities for contraband contraband, in international law, goods necessary or useful in the prosecution of war that a belligerent may lawfully seize from a neutral who is attempting to deliver them to the enemy.  smuggling smuggling, illegal transport across state or national boundaries of goods or persons liable to customs or to prohibition. Smuggling has been carried on in nearly all nations and has occasionally been adopted as an instrument of national policy, as by Great Britain  could be met by comparing a generic package label with an invoice inside a package, and that the prison was already searching all mail for contraband. (Security Housing Unit, Pelican Bay State Prison Pelican Bay State Prison is a California State Prison that houses some of California's most dangerous inmates.

The prison is a "supermax" facility located in the northwestern part of the state near Crescent City, Del Norte County, on 275 acres (1.1 km²).
, California)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:freedom of the press
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U9CA
Date:Feb 1, 2003
Words:138
Previous Article:Smith v. Board of County Com'rs. of County of Lyon.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Clement v. California Dept. of Corrections.(MAIL)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Invisible Censorship.(Brief Article)
My Two Cents.(Italian media mogul wants to be prime minister)(Brief Article)(Column)
A mind of their own: it's vital in democracies that the media be independent from government; it is the watchdog of the people. Isn't it also...
World press freedom day.(Brief Article)(Statistical Data Included)
Americans United, allies oppose `faith-based' funding in Wisconsin case. (People & Events).(Brief Article)
Ashker v. California Dept. of Corrections.(FREE SPEECH, EXPRESSION, ASSOC.)(Brief Article)
Clement v. California Dept. of Corrections.(MEDICAL CARE)(Brief Article)
Ashker v. California Dept. of Corrections.(prison security rules, reducing opportunities for contraband smuggling)(Brief Article)
Ashker v. California Dept. of Corrections.(violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)
Ashker v. California Dept. of Corrections.(violation of United States Constitution. 1st Amendment)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles