Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,716,402 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

As part of its efforts to prevent abusive business transactions, the IRS provides guidance on and reaffirms a determination it made in 1999: A taxpayer may not deduct rent or interest paid or incurred in connection with a lease-in/lease-out (Lilo) transaction. (Tax Matters).


As part of its efforts to prevent abusive business transactions, the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  provides guidance on and reaffirms a determination it made in 1999: A taxpayer may not deduct rent or interest paid or incurred in connection with a lease-in/lease-out (Lilo 1. (operating system) lilo - Linux Loader.
2. lilo - first-in first-out.
) transaction. In revenue ruling 2002-69, contained in IRB IRB

See: Industrial Revenue Bond
 2002-44 (www.irs.gov/pub/irs-irbs/irb02-44.pdf), the IRS says its position does not rely on the failure of such transactions to have a pretax pre·tax  
adj.
Existing before tax deductions: pretax income.

pretax adj [profit] → vor (Abzug der) Steuern 
 profit potential or a business purpose. But the service nevertheless may challenge the tax treatment of transactions that do have such characteristics. The IRS says that Lilos confer only a future interest in property, not a current leasehold interest. IRB 1999-13 (www.irs.gov/pub/irs-irbs/irb99-13.pdf) contains the earlier ruling.
COPYRIGHT 2003 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Date:Jan 1, 2003
Words:127
Previous Article:The Treasury Department and the IRS select 102 people to serve in a new group--the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel--which will identify taxpayers' concerns,...
Next Article:The IRS proposes regulations (www.irs.gov/pub/irs-regs/10377702.pdf) that would charge a $150 user fee to many taxpayers seeking an agreement, known...



Related Articles
Deductible? Maybe not. (taxation of professional fees)
IRS Examines Effects of LILO Transactions.
Deductibility of expenditures.
The carrot and the stick: IRS's new disclosure initiative and guidelines for imposing the section 6662 accuracy-related penalty.
Proposed guidance on capitalization.(Treasury Department advance notice of proposed rulemaking)
Comments on ANPR on capitalization: April 24, 2002.
Capitalization of intangibles.(intangible assets)
Rev. Rul. disallows LILO transaction deductions.(lease-in/lease-out transactions)
Acquiring contingent liabilities.
The final INDOPCO regulations: a primer.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles