As part of its efforts to prevent abusive business transactions, the IRS provides guidance on and reaffirms a determination it made in 1999: A taxpayer may not deduct rent or interest paid or incurred in connection with a lease-in/lease-out (Lilo) transaction. (Tax Matters).As part of its efforts to prevent abusive business transactions, the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws. provides guidance on and reaffirms a determination it made in 1999: A taxpayer may not deduct rent or interest paid or incurred in connection with a lease-in/lease-out (Lilo 1. (operating system) lilo - Linux Loader. 2. lilo - first-in first-out. ) transaction. In revenue ruling 2002-69, contained in IRB IRB See: Industrial Revenue Bond 2002-44 (www.irs.gov/pub/irs-irbs/irb02-44.pdf), the IRS says its position does not rely on the failure of such transactions to have a pretax pre·tax adj. Existing before tax deductions: pretax income. pretax adj [profit] → vor (Abzug der) Steuern profit potential or a business purpose. But the service nevertheless may challenge the tax treatment of transactions that do have such characteristics. The IRS says that Lilos confer only a future interest in property, not a current leasehold interest. IRB 1999-13 (www.irs.gov/pub/irs-irbs/irb99-13.pdf) contains the earlier ruling. |
|

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion