Art Under Control in North Korea.ART UNDER CONTROL IN NORTH KOREA BY JANE PORTAL LONDON: REAKTION BOOKS. 224 PAGES, $35. Now that old-school totalitarian North Korea has entered contemporary cultural discourse--not only has the country been recognized as an integral member of the "Axis of Evil," but its dictator, Kim Jong Il, has been lampooned on Saturday Night Live--an examination of its art suddenly seems timely. Jane Portal, a curator in the Oriental Antiquities Department at London's British Museum British Museum, the national repository in London for treasures in science and art. Located in the Bloomsbury section of the city, it has departments of antiquities, prints and drawings, coins and medals, and ethnography. The museum was established by act of Parliament in 1753 when the collection of Sir Hans Sloane, begun in the previous century and called the Cabinet of Curiosities, was purchased by the government and was joined with the Cotton collection (see, has seized the moment with Art Under Control in North Korea, a curious hybrid of international-affairs primer and illustrated art-historical study. As the former, the volume succeeds; as the latter, it is slightly lacking, despite its intriguing albeit obvious thesis: State-sponsored North Korean art borrows heavily from both Soviet and Chinese traditions of propagandistic socialist realism socialist realism, Soviet artistic and literary doctrine. The role of literature and art in Soviet society was redefined in 1932 when the newly created Union of Soviet Writers proclaimed socialist realism as compulsory literary practice. As conceived by Stalin, Zhdanov, and Gorky, socialist realism prescribed a generally optimistic picture of socialist reality and of the development of the Communist revolution. Its purpose was education in the spirit of socialism.. Indeed, Portal's early chapters offer a concise summary of international Communist art and its didactic di·dac·tic (d -d k t k)adj. intent, and thanks to her generous sampling of dramatic graphic posters portraying square-jawed workers in dynamic poses, this basic function of North Korean art is roundly established. While one wonders why she doesn't juxtapose them with examples from the former Soviet Union and China to enforce her assertion, Portal makes other, often surprising connections between Communist (and fascist) art and art intended to convey the ideals of democracy and freedom. For example, she argues that many large-scale, heroic statues of Kim Il Sung Kim Jong Il (kĭm jông ĭl), 1942–, was groomed as his successor. Active in the Korean Workers' party leadership since 1964, Kim Jong Il became secretary of its central committee in 1973. In 1991 he was appointed supreme commander of the armed forces. Upon his father's death, Kim Jong Il took over leadership of the country. (Kim Jong Il's father and the first official leader of North Korea's Communist regime) are similar to dramatic monuments in democratic countries, including the United States, for example Mount Rushmore and the Statue of Liberty. Portal's point--ostensibly simplistic but possibly subversive, given her choice of comparisons--seems to be that art is a powerful political tool, whether commissioned in a dictatorship or in a democracy. Given Portal's background as an art historian, it's surprising that five chapters out of six are devoted to an overview of North Korea's history and politics, with art as illustration rather than focus. Throughout the book, she presents a time line for Kim Il Sung's rise and his promotion of juche, or "self-reliance," a concept cribbed directly from both Soviet and Chinese Communist dogma, and constructs a portrait of Kim Jong Il as an insecure man (his "predilection for platform heels," notes Portal, "is thought to be a result of his feeling of inferiority at being shorter than his father") who even went so far as to kidnap a filmmaker whose movies he admires. Within a topical chronology of the country's art, Portal scatters a spectrum of images, ranging from a Mao-like portrait of Kim Il Sung (complete with slicked-back hair and shirt stiflingly buttoned up to his neck) to rarely seen original forms of North Korean art, such as unusually colorful figurative ink paintings on paper (a mix of Asian and Western aesthetics unique to the region). If only all political histories were accompanied by such engaging visual material. One hopes, however, that future studies of North Korean art will engage more directly with images and objects--although one can imagine the bureaucratic challenges of gaining access to material and sources. In the meantime, Portal's offering serves as an accessible introduction. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

-d
k
t
k)
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion