Army puts the Stryker on a fast track: light armored vehicle to prove its value in urban, peacekeeping operations.

In anticipation of extended peacekeeping duties in Iraq and future contingencies in urban areas, the Army is stepping up efforts to field its first Stryker light-armored vehicle brigade.

Despite a string of controversies that plagued the program in its early going. Army officials strongly support the decision to move forward with the $4 billion program.

A critical test took place in April, when a Stryker Brigade Combat Team participated in a series of mid- to high-intensity exercises at the National Training Center in Fort Irwin, Calif. Following that, the brigade was transported by rail, sea and air to the Joint Readiness Training Center in Fort Polk, La., where, for two weeks in May, it conducted operations, primarily in urban terrain.

The first SBCT--the 3rd Brigade of the 2nd Infantry Division, based at Fort Lewis, Wash.--is now entering the Initial Operational Testing and Evaluation phase.

"The IOT&E Strykers are the configuration that we want to get to," said Steven Campbell, the Stryker systems coordinator for the Army.

The Stryker is a 19-ton, eight-wheeled armored vehicle with two variants--the Infantry Carrier Vehicle (which comes in eight configurations) and the Mobile Gun System. The configurations for the ICV are: mortar carrier, reconnaissance, commander's vehicle, fire support, medical evacuation, engineer squad, anti-tank guided missile (ATGM) and the NBC reconnaissance vehicle, which is going to go into low rate production this December. The other configurations will enter full-rate production, once the program achieves Milestone III, said Campbell. Milestone III is a go-ahead to enter full-rate production.

The SBCT has 3,614 soldiers. In addition to the headquarters, it has three infantry battalions--each with 65 Stryker vehicles; a cavalry battalion in charge of reconnaissance, surveillance and target acquisition--with 53 vehicles, and an artillery battalion equipped with M198 155mm howitzers and counter-fire radars. The brigade also has a support battalion, a military intelligence company, an engineer company, a signal company and an anti-tank company.

The Army is planning to write an Operational Evaluation report to Congress, which is due this fall. The service is looking at converting five more brigades into SBCTs. The Army budgeted for six brigades.

Urban Combat

The Stryker's high-tech sensors and communications systems would have proved invaluable in operations in Iraq, said Col. Robert McClure, chief of war plans at the Army Staff. "It would have been phenomenally useful in those populated areas," McClure said at a Pentagon news conference.

The vehicle also would have been useful, "wherever you wanted to bring in more capable forces than light infantry and airborne," said Col. William Grisoli, deputy director for Army transformation.

The Stryker brigades are designed to be "fast-entry" units. The vehicle can travel 300 miles at 60 miles an hour before needing refueling.

It is also transportable on a C-130 cargo aircraft. It was not clear earlier in the program whether the Stryker would be able to meet the 38,000-pound weight requirement.

After some modifications to the vehicle by contractor General Dynamics Land Systems, the Stryker is light enough to load inside the C-130 cargo bay, but it can't fly very far without air refueling. Campbell said the farthest the Stryker has flown in a C-130, without refuelling, was 200 miles. But during a recent congressional hearing, Stryker critics complained that the range is only 60 miles.

Several factors affect C-130 transportability, said Campbell. One of them is the armor protection that the Air Force added around the crew compartments, which ups the weight of the cargo plane itself.

"The Air Force will say, 'depending what the mission is, we'll give you the kind of aircraft to meet your mission requirement,"' Campbell said.

"Most people that I have talked to will say that they can't see a C-130 going that fir [1,000 miles] to drop off the Stryker. You fly it in a C-17," Campbell added.

How fir the Stryker can fly in a C-130 also is a function of air temperature, elevation and runway, said Brig. Gen. Jack Gardner, the Army's deputy commander for transformation.

"If it is a lot of weight, high elevation, short runway, it may be 100 miles. If it is different elevation, different runway and different temperature it may be 700 miles," he said.

It ultimately becomes an operational decision to figure out how far the Stryker could be flown versus how far it would have to drive. "It may go into a runway that has better protection," Campbell said.

Lt. Col. Mick Nicholson, a military assistant to the secretary of the Army, explained that the C-130 metric is a basic transportation requirement, "but it is not always the preferred way to go. ... The Stryker can also be deployed by ship to a certain point of entry and be driven for hundreds of miles to the objective."

Once they get to the battle, the Stryker brigades only can operate for a short time without additional logistics support. The General Accounting Office raised this issue in a letter to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

"The brigades by design do not have the level of supply and transportation support personnel or the necessary equipment to move and distribute the fuel, water and other materiel [they] would need for extended operations," William M. Soils, the GAO director for defense capabilities and management, wrote in the letter. "External logistics support personnel are needed to configure, transport and distribute these supplies to the brigade."

The brigades' support battalion, as currently designed, has about one third of the maintenance support capability of an Army heavy brigade, said GAO. The brigades also rely heavily on contractors to service and maintain the vehicles and their complex digital suites.

The letter was meant to bring to Rumsfeld's attention that the Army was not planning to formally assess external logistical support as part of the operational evaluation. Instead, the Army would conduct separate, informal assessments of support concepts, said Solis.

Army officials briefed GAO on its logistics support plans. "The officials assured us that the results of the assessment will be included in the Army's final report on the operational evaluation," said Solis. "If the Army executes its plan as now envisioned it will meet the intent of our recommendations."

The bottom line is that the Stryker will not be deployed this summer, as Chief of Staff Gen. Eric Shinseki has hoped. A more realistic goal is to have the Stryker fielded by fall, at the earliest.

Survivability Concerns

Soldiers who participated in tests at JRTC generally gave the Stryker favorable reviews.

"The reason they have designed [the Stryker] is for us to get closer to the fight quicker," said Sgt. John Noel, from the 520th Infantry Battalion of the 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division. "Once you get in the urban fight, the vehicles for the most part will stay on the outside until we get more or less cleared."

But he cautioned that even though the Stryker offers more protection than other armored vehicles, such as the M-l13, crews are still vulnerable. The Strykers now being evaluated have 14.5 mm armor protection. Starting with the third brigade, add-on armor plates will be provided to protect against rocket propelled grenades. The previously fielded brigades can be retrofitted.

The extra armor would add 8,000 pounds to the Stryker, but Army officials said the armor would be transported separately from the vehicle. The first 50 armor sets are scheduled to arrive in July 2004, said Campbell.

Maj. Nick Mullen, with the brigade coordination cell, noted there are more infantry soldiers in an SBCT than in a heavy brigade or a light brigade. "This increases the lethality of the SBCT," he said.

The companies are combined arms teams that consist of a mobile gun platoon, mortar platoon (120-mm, 81 mm and 60 mm mortars), forward observers, a sniper team and three infantry line platoons. Eventually, they will also have TOW anti-tank missile launchers, said Campbell.

For urban combat, the plan is to have a bunker buster weapon, said Campbell. This type of round would be able to go through double reinforced concrete walls.

Urban combat was one of the main focuses of the operational evaluation at JRTC's Gordon-Shughart training center, a site specifically designed to simulate operations in urban terrain.

The Army also is building a new urban warfare training facility at Fort Lewis.

Special Operations 

The Stryker brigades are intended to work closely with Special Operations Forces, who typically would be the first to arrive to a combat zone.

Col. Bob Brown, the commander of the 1st Brigade, 25th Infantry Division, said the SOF would give the Stryker brigades "situational understanding."

One of the problems that SOF teams encounter as a first entry force is limited maneuverability. "We would come in as an early entry, and we would be able to maneuver and expand the area with the Stryker," said Brown. The Strykers would bring more communications capability bring more fighting capability. ... There is a liaison with the SOF, and they are constantly sharing info back and forth," said Brown.

At the JRTC tests, SOF teams had to collect information and pass it on to the SBCT. The Stryker brigades also had to operate under SOF command, said Gardner. "We think that all the future fights will be very joint, and it will be a combination of conventional and unconventional SOF, and we wanted to make sure that the SBCTs, and the Army can work effectively in that environment," he said.

One of the most significant technical advances that Stryker brigades bring to the fight is the RSTA (Reconnaissance, Surveillance, Targeting Acquisition) unit.

"It is what every Stryker leader always wanted, the eyes and ears," Brown told National Defense. "You have 450 soldiers that are your eyes and ears gathering info all over the battlefield."

For the first time ever, he said, the Army used the Shadow 200 unmanned air vehicle for targeting, including indirect-fire calls. "We have had UAVs before, of course, but we have never had them in the brigade," Brown said. An organic UAV enhances the brigade commander's targeting options, he added. "Before, the UAV was flying for us, but 50 units have access to it, so I couldn't tell it where to go."

The Shadow worked better at night, he said, because it has infrared sights.

"When you are looking through the Predator it's like looking through a soda straw," Brown said. The Shadow offers better angles. "When I used a Predator in Bosnia, I had a lot of trouble figuring that out, I needed an expert to tell me what was going on the ground," he said.

Traditionally artillery has been called in by voice. "They would call in a coordinate by voice and then would start the chain," said Spc. Richard Munroe, who manned the Shadow ground station at JRTC. "Now we have the capability to detect the target, sending an e-mail" to the fire-control operators. "Then it comes back to me saying, 'Verify the variable, because we are going to shoot at the target,' and they would shoot at the target as I am watching it. ... I do nor have to worry about calculating," he said.

Soldiers still need to improve their ability to quickly write e-mails with the targeting information. "Speaking is a lot faster than typing, in my opinion," he said. "But you con get more pertinent data in those e-mails compared to what I would be able to say in the voice transmission."

The Shadow has remote-viewing terminals, so soldiers on the ground can "look at exactly what it sees," Brown said. "You have three remote viewing terminals, so if I want to send it to a company if I want to give it to a captain--say he was going to a attack a village--I can give him the remote viewing terminal."

The availability of multiple sensors, meanwhile, makes information processing a challenge, said Brown. "Just because you have the technology you get lots of info, [but what] you need is lots of useful information."

The abundance of information makes soldiers train differently. "In the past, ... nobody was going to second-guess you," said Brown. Now, the situation has changed, because the same lieutenant gets 100 pieces of information that he needs to analyze. "When he goes to attack the hill, everything from his company commander to a four-star general can second guess him and say wait a minute,'" Brown noted.

"Some folks will just be overwhelmed by the information," he said. Stryker brigade commanders want to train soldiers how to decide what is useful. "You have to teach folks priority of messages," Brown said. They also are taught how to take the initiative, and "know that your chain of command supports you and backs you." That way, he said, initiative improves.

Mobile Gun System

The MGS is the piece of the Stryker program that is furthest behind in development.

General Dynamics had to modify the original design of the MGS to make it C-130 transportable. Now, the company is dealing with other MGS problems, such as the ammo handling system for the 105mm gun, according to Campbell.

"The requirement is that we should be able to recycle 54 rounds ... broken up in three groups of 18" while the vehicle goes through a bumpy ride, Campbell explained. "Now we have got to a point where we are able to go through a complete 54 cycle of rounds, and it is starting to work."

The ammo handling system has a complex alignment, said Campbell. "So you transfer the rounds from one level to another level, and then you transfer it into the gun," he said.

Another problem was with the muzzle break, designed to soften the recoil of the gun, said Campbell. "Initially on the 105, you have openings on the edges of the barrel to let the blast go our," he said. "What was happening though is that the blast was going out and damaging a part of the vehicle."

The solution is a lightweight rube and the elimination of the muzzle break at the end. "Because the way the vehicle was built, it could still take the additional recoil," Campbell said. "Without the muzzle break, there is about a 3 percent increase in recoil but the system is able to handle that without additional problems."

Also, without the muzzle break, the Stryker is 200 pounds lighter, he added.

Another concern in the MGS is the space available for the crew. In the earlier design, "the areas were too small for the average soldier," said Campbell. "The intent is to have you want to get above the 90-percentile soldier to get into the vehicle. We are finding that out now, because we are in testing. We have taken several corrective actions to fix the problem."

The Army must have all these fixes completed before next year's user test, scheduled to begin in May. According to Campbell, in January, the Army will brief the Defense Acquisition Board and recommend limited procurement of the MGS. The Army is moving into full-rate production for the eight Stryker basic configurations and is going to ask for limited rate production on both the MGS and NBC version.

Some performance shortfalls in the Infantry Carrier Vehicles surfaced last year, during the Millennium Challenge exercise at the NTC. Campbell said several problems have been fixed, while some still need attention, such as the Remote Weapons Station. The RWS operates the .50 caliber weapon.

"We have got three improvements already on Remote Weapons System from different variations of software they have put in it," said Noel. He was a squad leader at the NTC exercise last year.

"We had a lot of problems last year. The heat would freeze up the RWS," he said. "When they revised it, they had another problem with it. It was freezing to the rear. [Now], with the third version, we had no problems at NTC this year."

He said that the RWS has been reinforced with extra beams, "so that it does not come down on its own," he said.

Despite the extra hold, "the RWS has not been stabilized enough," said Spc. Scott Borowski. "Every movement the vehicle makes, it makes as well, so you can't really effectively shoot on the run and the picture isn't that good."

He said that he was not impressed by the images from the thermal sight. And he complained the vehicle lacks a range finder. Several soldiers interviewed at the NTC last year had complained about the thermal sights in the RWS (National Defense July 2002). However, according to Noel, changes have not been made to the sight.

"Some of the changes come sooner, some are later," he said. "Thermal and stabilization are very expensive, so whether that ever happens I do not know."

The antennas on the MGS have been moved around for better placement, said Noel. "They have reinforced a lot of things down and it is a little bit better."

During the operational evaluation, both at the NTC and the JRTC, the tire damage is still very high, soldiers said. "The outer wall is still thin, there is not much they can do about it," said Noel.

Additionally, the squad leader's digital display needs a keyboard rather than have a touch screen, which "just isn't phenomenal," said Borowski.

Sometimes, there are communications problems, he said. "On a lot of these communications, we are on line of sight and they are very temperamental. If you do not have line of sight, then you do not get communications."

Among the novel devices on the Stryker is the Force XXI battle command computer for brigade and below, called the FBCB2. It displays the location of every vehicle in the brigade. "It runs pretty decent, but we have software problems. Overall, the small bugs need to be worked our. Nothing major," he said.

In hot-weather exercises, it is common to hear soldiers say they would like better air conditioning systems in the vehicle. "That is something that would be nice to have but nor necessarily readily available today," said Campbell. Modifications to the air conditioning would cause a change to the engine. "That is not programmed in the funding right now," he said.

Delivery Schedule

As the first SBCT gets closer to deployment, the second brigade is scheduled to be operational in 2004. That will be the 1st Brigade, 25th Infantry Division at Fort Lewis. The third SBCT is slated for the 172nd Infantry Brigade at Forts Wainwrighr and Richardson, in Alaska, to become operational in 2005.

The fourth SBCT, slated for 2006, will be the 2nd Cavalry Regiment, based at Fort Polk. The 2nd Cavalry regiment has helicopters and a huge reconnaissance organization, said Lr. Col. Kathy Jennings, a program officer on the Army Staff.

"We ate not going to take that away from them," she added. Tankers that were stationed at Fort Polk will have to change location, because none of the tank units will be converted to SBCTs, she said.

The fifth brigade is planned for the 2nd Brigade of the 25th Infantry Division at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, in 2007, while the sixth SBCT will be the 56th Brigade of the 28th Infantry Division of the Pennsylvania Army National Guard, in 2010.

"At any given time, we'll have two Stryker brigades in transition," said Jennings.

RELATED ARTICLE: Army Sets Up New Testing Center for Future Combat System

The Army opened a new facility designed specifically to test the capabilities of the Future Combat System.

Called the Combined Test Organization for Future Combat System, the site is located at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.

At the helm of the CTO will be C. David Brown, who previously served as director of the Developmental Test Command's Test Technology Division. He said the CTO will play a central role in the testing and fielding of Future Combat Systems.

The program is an unprecedented effort by the Army to integrate various families of ground vehicles and aircraft, as well as robotic systems.

The command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities will be linked in a digital network, to facilitate the exchange and flow of information.

Due to the complexity of the program, several agencies have responsibilities for testing the system. Among them are the Army's program manager for FCS, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Army Test and Evaluation Command (including the Developmental Test Command, Operational Test Command and Army Evaluation Center) and the lead system integrator-a partnership between Boeing and the Science Applications International Corporation.

Tests will take place in natural and man-made environments, designed to stress the technology and ensure it works in harsh weather, for example. Systems will be tested in conditions resembling real operations, according to Brown. The program will require simultaneous testing of ECS components at test centers in various locations throughout the United States.

This "distributed" testing will help Army evaluators determine how FCS components operate together as a "system of systems," Brown said.

Following the developmental phase of the FCS tests, the Army's Operational Test Command will evaluate the system in the field, with soldiers participating in realistic operational scenarios. This also will involve distributed testing at various locations.

The Army Evaluation Center will use the data from developmental and operational testing to complete formal system evaluation reports for the Army.

This information will help senior leaders make critical acquisition decisions at various milestones in the FCS program--Mike Cast, Developmental Test Command Public Affairs