Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,724,716 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Armed guard found asleep at nuke plant


A federal inspector found an armed guard asleep at a gate inside the Indian Point nuclear power plants but officials said Monday there was no security breach.

The inspector spent two minutes trying to rouse the unnamed guard Sunday afternoon before the guard "stood up and opened his eyes," said Neil Sheehan, spokesman for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The five-year veteran was alone on the second of three security rings around the two plants in Buchanan, about 35 miles north of New York City, Sheehan said.

He said other security measures at the gate remained in operation during the guard's nap and tapes showed there was no breach, "but that doesn't make it any less serious."

Jim Steets, spokesman for Indian Point owner Entergy Nuclear, said the other measures included a palm-print reader and a badge scanner. The two would have had to match before the gate would open.

There was another security ring that would have had to be passed to reach critical areas, including the reactor and the spent-fuel pool, Sheehan said.

The guard was found sleeping during a "backshift" inspection _ focused on night and weekend operations.

Sheehan said Entergy "needs to get to the bottom of this and make sure the staff knows this is unacceptable."

Steets said the guard, an Entergy employee, was placed on administrative leave pending tests for drugs and alcohol and a review. He said the guard carried a sidearm.

He said security guards are rotated from post to post during their 12-hour shifts _ "in part to keep them attentive" _ and the guard had worked two previous posts on Sunday. His shift began at 6 a.m.

Indian Point, on the Hudson River 35 miles north of midtown Manhattan, has attracted widespread criticism, especially since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. The problems included siren failures and leaks of radioactive water.

Officials and activists say its safety and security are questionable. Federal regulators have turned away attempts to have it shut down, however.

Copyright 2007 AP News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright (c) Mochila, Inc.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:JIM FITZGERALD
Publication:AP News
Date:Aug 27, 2007
Words:332
Previous Article:CBS, Washington Post in online news deal
Next Article:Stocks end lower on drop in home sales



Related Articles
The Achilles' heel of nuclear power. (In Brief)
Feeding the "axis of evil". (Insider Report).
Don't blur nuclear line.(Editorials)(Ending low-yield weapons ban unwise)(Editorial)
Coal plant cancer clusters?(Advice & dissent: letters from our readers)(Letter to the Editor)
Dodging doomsday.(Editorials)(Congress wisely cuts funds to develop new nukes)(Editorial)
Nuclear hypocrisy.(Editorials)(Congress should cut funds for weapons research)(Editorial)
Many questions raised by loose nukes.(Inside Track)
Rockers renew 1970s anti-nuclear theme
NRC: Little danger in nuclear plant nap
Did Israel's Acquisition of Nuclear Weapons Lead to 1967 War?

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles