Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,595,263 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Arguing: Exchanging Reasons Face to Face.


BF637

2004-056423

0-8058-4854-1

Arguing; exchanging reasons face to face.

Hample, Dale. (Lea's communication series)

Lawrence Erlbaum, [c]2005

369 p.

$99.95

The study of the process by which people come to agreement about mundane (jargon) mundane - Someone outside some group that is implicit from the context, such as the computer industry or science fiction fandom. The implication is that those in the group are special and those outside are just ordinary.  or cosmic cos·mic   also cos·mi·cal
adj.
1. Of or relating to the universe, especially as distinct from Earth.

2. Infinitely or inconceivably extended; vast:
 matters is as old as Aristotle Aristotle (ăr'ĭstŏt`əl), 384–322 B.C., Greek philosopher, b. Stagira. He is sometimes called the Stagirite. Life


Aristotle's father, Nicomachus, was a noted physician. Aristotle studied (367–347 B.C.
, says Hample (Western Illinois U.), but he is not concerned here with that history. Neither is he interested in the content or outcome of the argument. Rather he focuses on approaches developed late in the 20th century for analyzing the process of arguing in conversation. Drawing from such fields as personality psychology, conversation analysis, conflict management, persuasion PERSUASION. The act of influencing by expostulation or request. While the persuasion is confined within those limits which leave the mind free, it may be used to induce another to make his will, or even to make it in his own favor; but if such persuasion should so far operate on the mind , cognitive science cognitive science

Interdisciplinary study that attempts to explain the cognitive processes of humans and some higher animals in terms of the manipulation of symbols using computational rules.
, and rhetoric, he explores such aspects as what people think they are doing when they argue, editing arguments, the emotional experience of arguing, individual and situational differences in arguing, and impossible arguments.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Book News, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:PSYCHOLOGY
Publication:Reference & Research Book News
Article Type:Book Review
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:134
Previous Article:Love and Delusion: Real Love and Honest Lies.
Next Article:Becoming a Reflexive Researcher: Using Our Selves in Research.
Topics:



Related Articles
Minding the Close Relationship: A Theory of Relationship Enhancement.
Are we just really smart robots? Two books on the mind put the human back into human beings.
Moral vision; how everyday life shapes ethical thinking.
Experts in Court: Reconciling Law, Science, and Professional Knowledge.
Globalisation: Non-formal Education & Rural Development.
Annual review of psychology; v.57, 2006.
The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation Identity, Emotions and Foreign Policy.
A practical guide to appellate advocacy, 2d ed.
Twenty-eight Artists and Two Saints.
Albert R. Roberts and Kenneth R. Yeager, Foundations of Evidence Based Social Work Practice.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles