Appellate Expert Who Argued Similar Out-Of-State Non-Compete Case Available to Comment on Microsoft v. Lee & Google.LOS ANGELES Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. -- The issues in Microsoft v. Lee & Google are similar to those faced by Robin Meadow, a partner in the leading appellate Relating to appeals; reviews by superior courts of decisions of inferior courts or administrative agencies and other proceedings. boutique Greines Martin Stein & Richland LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol , when he represented Advanced Bionics Corporation before the California Supreme Court in a lawsuit involving multi-jurisdiction litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute. When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation. over the enforcement of a non-compete agreement -- Advanced Bionics Corporation v. Medtronic, Inc. Meadow is available to comment on the jurisdictional, strategic and other issues associated with the Microsoft case as both sides wait for the judge's ruling on extending the TRO TRO - tail recursion optimisation until the trial, which is set for January. The TRO hearing is set for September 6. "Time is on Microsoft's side," notes Meadow. "Even with an expedited trial, getting an injunction can mean winning the case. Search technology is such a fast-moving area that even a several-month delay could seriously compromise Google's ability to take advantage of Dr. Lee's expertise." "Google is trying to litigate the issues in California, where the law is very much more favorable fa·vor·a·ble adj. 1. Advantageous; helpful: favorable winds. 2. Encouraging; propitious: a favorable diagnosis. 3. to it," Meadow adds. "But with Microsoft on a fast track to judgment in Washington, Google is up against a serious problem because of a key difference in the two states' laws. A Washington judgment will be immediately binding on California courts, but the opposite isn't true: Even if Google were to get a judgment today in California, it would have to be affirmed on appeal in order to be binding in Washington." Many companies seek to bind their employees to broad non-compete agreements for a variety of reasons often having to do with protecting trade secrets. While many states will enforce these agreements, including Washington, California For the town formerly called Washington, in Yolo County, California, see . Washington is an unincorporated community located in Nevada County, California. Washington is located on the banks of the South Fork of The Yuba River and has a population of approximately two hundred law is highly restrictive. California courts will generally not enforce non-competes unless they are narrowly drawn and specifically tailored to legally permissible goals. Litigation outcomes in this area are therefore highly dependent on the choice of forum. You can reach Robin Meadow directly at (310) 859-7811, or call Anne Sage at (310) 396-2400 to arrange an interview. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion