Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,595,263 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Appellate Court Affirms Kubota's Win Over John Deere in Patent Case.


News Editors/Legal Writers

TORRANCE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 5, 2003

On July 17, 2003, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC CAFC Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
CAFC Canada Firearms Centre
CAFC US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
CAFC Charlton Athletic Football Club (UK)
CAFC Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs
) affirmed af·firm  
v. af·firmed, af·firm·ing, af·firms

v.tr.
1. To declare positively or firmly; maintain to be true.

2. To support or uphold the validity of; confirm.

v.intr.
 a jury verdict and judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois in favor of upon the side of; favorable to; for the advantage of.

See also: favor
 Kubota in a patent case brought by John Deere.

On March 31, 1999, Deere filed a lawsuit against Kubota Corporation and Kubota Tractor Corporation before the Federal District Court in Illinois claiming that the implement suspension mechanisms of Kubota's TG1860-series lawn and garden tractors and of other models (B-, BX-, and New G-series) infringe in·fringe  
v. in·fringed, in·fring·ing, in·fring·es

v.tr.
1. To transgress or exceed the limits of; violate: infringe a contract; infringe a patent.

2.
 a patent owned by Deere. Kubota mounted a vigorous defense to what it felt were groundless allegations.

On April 5, 2002, following a two-week trial, the jury rejected Deere's arguments and issued a verdict that Kubota's implement suspension mechanisms did not infringe Deere's patent. The District Court later affirmed the jury's verdict and issued a final judgment in favor of Kubota.

Deere initiated the lawsuit with a public statement accusing Kubota of copying Deere's technology. The jury's verdict of noninfringement, affirmed by the District Court, rejected Deere's claim and fully supported Kubota's position.

Dissatisfied dis·sat·is·fied  
adj.
Feeling or exhibiting a lack of contentment or satisfaction.



dis·satis·fied
 with the District Court's ruling, Deere filed an appeal with the CAFC on September 9, 2002.

After filing written briefs with the CAFC, both parties presented oral arguments to the CAFC in Washington, D.C. on July 8, 2003. The CAFC, in a swift and summary decision, affirmed the jury verdict and the District Court's judgment, rejecting Deere's appeal and confirming the validity of Kubota's position.

Kubota's developments of technology for its products are advanced and the jury and federal court clearly recognized the validity of Kubota's arguments based on this fact.

Kubota Tractor Corporation markets a complete line of tractors from 12.5 to 99.5 PTO PTO
abbr.
1. Parent Teacher Organization

2. or p.t.o. please turn over

3. power takeoff


PTO or pto please turn over

Noun 1.
 horsepower horsepower, unit of power in the English system of units. It is equal to 33,000 foot-pounds per minute or 550 foot-pounds per second or approximately 746 watts. , along with a line of performance matched implements, compact construction equipment, pumps and generators, consumer lawn and garden equipment and commercial turf products. For more information about Kubota products, contact Kubota Tractor Corporation, 3401 Del Amo Blvd., Torrance, California 90503, 1-888-4KUBOTA, ext. 900 or visit the website at www.kubota.com.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Aug 5, 2003
Words:353
Previous Article:U.S. Restaurant Properties, Inc. Announces 2nd Quarter Results.
Next Article:S&P Asgns Prlm Rtgs to PUMA's Latest RMBS Issue.
Topics:



Related Articles
CALIFORNIA SMOKER'S $25 MILLION VERDICT CUT BY MORE THAN HALF.
Suits blast sand suppliers for failing to warn of silica hazard.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles