Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,595,263 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Appeals panel reverses fraud finding.


After nearly a decade of fighting charges of scientific misconduct scientific misconduct,
n the fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism of research data, or other violations of ethical standards of the scientific community.
, immunologist Thereza Imanishi-Kari has been cleared of wrongdoing wrong·do·er  
n.
One who does wrong, especially morally or ethically.



wrongdo
 by a federal appeals panel.

The Department of Health and Human Services Noun 1. Department of Health and Human Services - the United States federal department that administers all federal programs dealing with health and welfare; created in 1979
Health and Human Services, HHS
 panel concluded that the Office of Research Integrity (ORI), the division of HHS HHS Department of Health and Human Services.  charged with investigating misconduct cases, had not proved its case against Imanishi-Kari. ORI had concluded that she intentionally fabricated experimental data that went into a 1986 paper published in Cell.

The panel rejected all 19 of the scientific misconduct charges brought against Imanishi-Kari. The ruling means that she no longer faces ORI's proposed 10-year ban on federal funding of her research.

The victory for Imanishi-Kari also affects Cell coauthor David Baltimore, a Nobel prize-winning molecular biologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Massachusetts Institute of Technology, at Cambridge; coeducational; chartered 1861, opened 1865 in Boston, moved 1916. It has long been recognized as an outstanding technological institute and its Sloan School of Management has notable programs in business, . Although Baltimore's scientific work in the Cell paper had never been in question, the long-running investigation had negative consequences for him. In 1991, he resigned as president of Rockefeller University in New York City New York City: see New York, city.
New York City

City (pop., 2000: 8,008,278), southeastern New York, at the mouth of the Hudson River. The largest city in the U.S.
 (SN: 12/14/91, p. 399).

In explaining its decision, the appeals panel noted that some previous scientific reviewers who examined the Imanishi-Kari case had found "no evidence that scientific misconduct had occurred."

The panel also rejected the forensic analysis of Imanishi-Kari's laboratory notebooks, saying that it "provided no independent or convincing evidence that the data or documents were not authentic." ORI had cited that analysis, conducted by the Secret Service, as strong evidence that Imanishi-Kari had fabricated data underpinning the Cell paper (SN: 3/30/91, p. 196). The appeals panel also panned a statistical analysis by ORI that suggested Imanishi-Kari had committed fraud.

The 183-page HHS decision criticized ORI's probe of the Imanishi-Kari case. "Much of what ORI presented was irrelevant . . . was not credible or not corroborated cor·rob·o·rate  
tr.v. cor·rob·o·rat·ed, cor·rob·o·rat·ing, cor·rob·o·rates
To strengthen or support with other evidence; make more certain. See Synonyms at confirm.
, or was based on unwarranted assumptions," the panel concluded.
COPYRIGHT 1996 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1996, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:immunologist Thereza Imanishi-Karl cleared of scientific misconduct
Author:Fackelmann, K.
Publication:Science News
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Jul 6, 1996
Words:297
Previous Article:The moon's tug stretches out the day.
Next Article:Combined forces create Southwest draught.
Topics:



Related Articles
Baltimore case reopened.
Fraud debate aired on Capitol Hill.
White coats, black deeds; the new scientific method: lie, cheat, and get good PR.
NIH says paper contained bogus data.
Regrets, countercharges mark fraud dispute.
AIDS codiscoverer censured for misconduct.
NIH fraud busters get new assignment.
AIDS researcher cleared of charges.
Fraud panel finds researcher guilty.
Fishy findings sustain, then snuff, stellar career. (Flame Out).

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles