Printer Friendly
The Free Library
6,672,335 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Appeals court rules racial bias lawsuit at LAX can proceed.


An Appellate District court ruling has revived a lawsuit by a former employee of Mercury Air Group Inc. who alleges that the company discriminated against blacks at its Los Angeles International Airport “LAX” redirects here. For other uses, see LAX (disambiguation).

“KLAX” redirects here. For other uses, see KLAX (disambiguation).

Los Angeles International Airport (IATA: LAX, ICAO: KLAX, FAA LID: LAX
 facility.

"He gets a second shot at the case," said Pamela Teren, a partner at Abrolat & Teren LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol  representing the plaintiff, Michael Marigny. "He gets to pursue his claims that he was discriminated against and harassed and that Mercury negligently failed to stop it once it was occurring."

According to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 court documents, Marigny claims several co-workers and low-level managers consistently made racially derogatory remarks when referring to black employees.

On May 18, 1999, Marigny met with his manager, a duty manager and three trainees to determine the cause of a refueling mistake that caused a plane to be delayed.

One trainee, Robert Willard, a white man in his 20s, referred to Marigny, who is in his 40s, as a "boy," a "gangster" and used a racial slur, according to court documents.

Marigny made a formal complaint with the company but received no response. Steve Antonoff, human resources The fancy word for "people." The human resources department within an organization, years ago known as the "personnel department," manages the administrative aspects of the employees.  director at Mercury, denied that any employee heard the racially offensive remarks and added that "everyone has a right to express themselves," according to court papers.

Marigny, who was fired on Dec. 30, 1999, sued Mercury Air for discrimination and retaliation, negligence, wrongful termination wrongful termination n. a right of an employee to sue his/her employer for damages (loss of wage and "fringe" benefits, and, if against "public policy," for punitive damages).  and emotional distress emotional distress n. an increasingly popular basis for a claim of damages in lawsuits for injury due to the negligence or intentional acts of another. Originally damages for emotional distress were only awardable in conjunction with damages for actual physical harm. . An L.A. Superior Court judge threw out all but one of his claims, which was turned down by a jury. The jury, however, awarded Marigny $115,000 for emotional distress.

The recent appellate ruling by a three-judge panel in 2nd Appellate District reversed the lower court ruling on all the claims, including requests for punitive damages Monetary compensation awarded to an injured party that goes beyond that which is necessary to compensate the individual for losses and that is intended to punish the wrongdoer. , and sent back the $115,000 emotional distress award, which the panel suggested should have been higher.

Ken Markowitz, a partner at Kenney & Markowitz LLP representing Mercury Air, said the company refutes Marigny's allegations. "Our position and Mercury's have not changed," he said. "His allegations are not meritorious."

He called Antonoff's alleged statement "an uncorroborated allegation." Further, Markowitz said, Marigny was fired because he failed to give employment information needed for a new security badge issued to all employees at LAX as part of Year 2000 preparations.
COPYRIGHT 2003 CBJ, L.P.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Los Angeles International Airport discrimination case filed; Up Front
Author:Bronstad, Amanda
Publication:Los Angeles Business Journal
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Sep 1, 2003
Words:370
Previous Article:Apartment owners latest target of Prop 65 class-action suits.(Law)(lawsuits over carcinogens and toxic materials)
Next Article:New 'do for Jerry's: rebuilt Studio City spot set to open, chain getting a makeover.(Up Front)(Jerry's Famous Dell in Studio City will reopen)
Topics:



Related Articles
Judge overturns $45 million verdict against Lockheed.
High Court dismisses appeal over private lawsuits in environmental racism case.
Federalism and the Supreme Court.
L.A. DROPS SUIT AGAINST AIRPORT AUTHORITY.(News)
AIRPORT SUIT CAN PROCEED.(News)
Increased use of 1866 law seen in race bias cases.(Civil Rights Act of 1866)
BRIEFLY SECESSION FORUM SET FOR THURSDAY.(News)
Jury bias matters.(Editorials)(Court ruling affects death penalty cases)(Editorial)
JUDGE REFUSES TO REINSTATE DISCRIMINATION CASE.(News)
Corrections.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles